荷兰的文化话语:谈论内城的少数民族

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power Pub Date : 1997-08-01 DOI:10.1080/1070289X.1997.9962584
M. Verkuyten
{"title":"荷兰的文化话语:谈论内城的少数民族","authors":"M. Verkuyten","doi":"10.1080/1070289X.1997.9962584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines how ethnic Dutch residents of two old neighborhoods in the city of Rotterdam use the notion of “culture” when they talk and argue among themselves about the multi‐ethnic area they live in. Some of the ways in which culture as a discourse is used are outlined and some of the possible effects such a discourse may have are discussed. It is shown that the term culture is used in a self‐evident and self‐sufficient way as a commonplace. In addition, most of the inhabitants use a reified and essentialistic notion of culture for constructing “us” and “them” distinctions. Cultural differences are evaluated in favor of one's own group and used for arguing for the incompatibility of cultural groups. Three conceptualizations of culture can be distinguished. All three have the effect of “blaming the victim,” but each attributes a different degree of blame to immigrant groups: culture as heritage, culture as doctrine, and culture as mentality. The notion of culture is used flexibly and in a self‐ser...","PeriodicalId":47227,"journal":{"name":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1997-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural discourses in the Netherlands: Talking about ethnic minorities in the inner‐city\",\"authors\":\"M. Verkuyten\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1070289X.1997.9962584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines how ethnic Dutch residents of two old neighborhoods in the city of Rotterdam use the notion of “culture” when they talk and argue among themselves about the multi‐ethnic area they live in. Some of the ways in which culture as a discourse is used are outlined and some of the possible effects such a discourse may have are discussed. It is shown that the term culture is used in a self‐evident and self‐sufficient way as a commonplace. In addition, most of the inhabitants use a reified and essentialistic notion of culture for constructing “us” and “them” distinctions. Cultural differences are evaluated in favor of one's own group and used for arguing for the incompatibility of cultural groups. Three conceptualizations of culture can be distinguished. All three have the effect of “blaming the victim,” but each attributes a different degree of blame to immigrant groups: culture as heritage, culture as doctrine, and culture as mentality. The notion of culture is used flexibly and in a self‐ser...\",\"PeriodicalId\":47227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1997.9962584\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1997.9962584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

本文研究了鹿特丹市两个老社区的荷兰裔居民在谈论和争论他们所居住的多民族地区时如何使用“文化”的概念。概述了文化作为一种话语被使用的一些方式,并讨论了这种话语可能产生的一些影响。研究表明,文化一词作为一种老生常谈,其使用方式是不言而喻的。此外,大多数居民使用一种物化的、本质主义的文化观念来构建“我们”和“他们”的区别。文化差异被评价为有利于自己的群体,并被用来争论文化群体的不兼容性。文化有三种不同的概念。这三种观点都有“指责受害者”的效果,但每一种都将不同程度的指责归咎于移民群体:文化作为遗产,文化作为教义,文化作为心态。“文化”的概念被灵活地运用于自我服务中……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cultural discourses in the Netherlands: Talking about ethnic minorities in the inner‐city
This paper examines how ethnic Dutch residents of two old neighborhoods in the city of Rotterdam use the notion of “culture” when they talk and argue among themselves about the multi‐ethnic area they live in. Some of the ways in which culture as a discourse is used are outlined and some of the possible effects such a discourse may have are discussed. It is shown that the term culture is used in a self‐evident and self‐sufficient way as a commonplace. In addition, most of the inhabitants use a reified and essentialistic notion of culture for constructing “us” and “them” distinctions. Cultural differences are evaluated in favor of one's own group and used for arguing for the incompatibility of cultural groups. Three conceptualizations of culture can be distinguished. All three have the effect of “blaming the victim,” but each attributes a different degree of blame to immigrant groups: culture as heritage, culture as doctrine, and culture as mentality. The notion of culture is used flexibly and in a self‐ser...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Identities explores the relationship of racial, ethnic and national identities and power hierarchies within national and global arenas. It examines the collective representations of social, political, economic and cultural boundaries as aspects of processes of domination, struggle and resistance, and it probes the unidentified and unarticulated class structures and gender relations that remain integral to both maintaining and challenging subordination. Identities responds to the paradox of our time: the growth of a global economy and transnational movements of populations produce or perpetuate distinctive cultural practices and differentiated identities.
期刊最新文献
Essentialism and intersectionality in the selection and recruitment of staff: the devaluation of migrant women’s skills in France and Italy Caring for political memory: a response to my critics Contribution to symposium on Political Memory and the Aesthetics of Care: The Art of Complicity and Resistance Contribution to symposium on Political Memory and the Aesthetics of Care: The Art of Complicity and Resistance , By Mihaela Mihai, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 2022, 295pp, £25.95, paperback. Remembering is caring (or: what is complicitous memory?) Book review of political memory and the aesthetics of care: the art of complicity and resistance , by Mihaela Mihai, Reviewed by Sakiru Adebayo, Stanford University Press, 2022, pp., 312. “We are here, but our hearts are in Haiti”: temporal and racialized emotive existences of ethnically identified Haitian Americans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1