感知风险视角下公众环境风险反应行为的影响因素与途径研究——以上海JS工业区为例

Ke Xu, Lan Lan, Peng Xu, Cun-kuan Bao
{"title":"感知风险视角下公众环境风险反应行为的影响因素与途径研究——以上海JS工业区为例","authors":"Ke Xu, Lan Lan, Peng Xu, Cun-kuan Bao","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2022.2075314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As the environmental risk awareness increases, the public is highly concerned about the possible environmental risks in industrial zones. When the public’s risk response behaviors are different, the social operation cost and governance effectiveness will also vary greatly. This article divides the public risk response behavior into two forms: collaborative and antagonistic. It conducts research in the JS industrial zone, using the structural equation model to study the influencing factors and action paths of the public risk response behaviors. The results show that the enhancement of system trust and self-efficacy will promote the public to adopt collaborative behavior, while lacking of system trust, public participation efficacy and perceived benefit will lead to antagonistic behavior, and system trust is the decisive factor. In addition, the mediating effect of risk perception is significant in the transformation from lacking of system trust and public participation efficacy to antagonistic behavior, especially in the influence mechanism of public participation efficacy, which is fully mediated. Finally, this article proposes to implement the rights and responsibilities, improve interest compensation, break the decision-making mode, strengthen knowledge cultivation and deepen risk communication, so as to guide the public’s collaborative behavior, avoid the occurrence of confrontation events and realize the sustainable development of risk society.","PeriodicalId":13141,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal","volume":"161 1","pages":"521 - 540"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the factors and pathways influencing the public’s environmental risk response behavior from the perspective of perceived risk – A case study of JS industrial zone in Shanghai, China\",\"authors\":\"Ke Xu, Lan Lan, Peng Xu, Cun-kuan Bao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10807039.2022.2075314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract As the environmental risk awareness increases, the public is highly concerned about the possible environmental risks in industrial zones. When the public’s risk response behaviors are different, the social operation cost and governance effectiveness will also vary greatly. This article divides the public risk response behavior into two forms: collaborative and antagonistic. It conducts research in the JS industrial zone, using the structural equation model to study the influencing factors and action paths of the public risk response behaviors. The results show that the enhancement of system trust and self-efficacy will promote the public to adopt collaborative behavior, while lacking of system trust, public participation efficacy and perceived benefit will lead to antagonistic behavior, and system trust is the decisive factor. In addition, the mediating effect of risk perception is significant in the transformation from lacking of system trust and public participation efficacy to antagonistic behavior, especially in the influence mechanism of public participation efficacy, which is fully mediated. Finally, this article proposes to implement the rights and responsibilities, improve interest compensation, break the decision-making mode, strengthen knowledge cultivation and deepen risk communication, so as to guide the public’s collaborative behavior, avoid the occurrence of confrontation events and realize the sustainable development of risk society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"161 1\",\"pages\":\"521 - 540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2022.2075314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2022.2075314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着环境风险意识的增强,公众对工业园区可能存在的环境风险高度关注。当公众的风险应对行为不同时,社会运行成本和治理效果也会有很大差异。本文将公众风险应对行为分为协作和对抗两种形式。以JS工业区为研究对象,运用结构方程模型研究公众风险应对行为的影响因素和作用路径。结果表明,制度信任和自我效能的增强会促进公众采取合作行为,而缺乏制度信任、公众参与效能和感知利益会导致对抗行为,制度信任是决定性因素。此外,风险感知在制度信任缺失和公众参与效能向对抗行为转变过程中的中介作用显著,特别是在公众参与效能的影响机制中,风险感知的中介作用是完全中介的。最后,本文提出了落实权责、完善利益补偿、打破决策模式、加强知识培养、深化风险沟通等措施,以引导公众的协同行为,避免对抗事件的发生,实现风险社会的可持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Study on the factors and pathways influencing the public’s environmental risk response behavior from the perspective of perceived risk – A case study of JS industrial zone in Shanghai, China
Abstract As the environmental risk awareness increases, the public is highly concerned about the possible environmental risks in industrial zones. When the public’s risk response behaviors are different, the social operation cost and governance effectiveness will also vary greatly. This article divides the public risk response behavior into two forms: collaborative and antagonistic. It conducts research in the JS industrial zone, using the structural equation model to study the influencing factors and action paths of the public risk response behaviors. The results show that the enhancement of system trust and self-efficacy will promote the public to adopt collaborative behavior, while lacking of system trust, public participation efficacy and perceived benefit will lead to antagonistic behavior, and system trust is the decisive factor. In addition, the mediating effect of risk perception is significant in the transformation from lacking of system trust and public participation efficacy to antagonistic behavior, especially in the influence mechanism of public participation efficacy, which is fully mediated. Finally, this article proposes to implement the rights and responsibilities, improve interest compensation, break the decision-making mode, strengthen knowledge cultivation and deepen risk communication, so as to guide the public’s collaborative behavior, avoid the occurrence of confrontation events and realize the sustainable development of risk society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Environmental implication identification on water quality variation and human health risk assessment in the middle and lower reaches of the Hanjiang River, China Estimation of glyphosate biological half-life among farmers and residents in Thailand Integrating ecosystem service value in the disclosure of landscape ecological risk changes: a case study in Yangtze River Economic Belt, China Exposure level and risk assessment of atrazine in Chinese adults based on the systematic review data and the Monte Carlo simulation method A novel biomonitoring method to detect pyrethroid metabolites in saliva of occupationally exposed workers as a tool for risk assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1