可再生能源的未来:对上网电价和可再生能源投资组合标准的评估

Ipshita Chaturvedi
{"title":"可再生能源的未来:对上网电价和可再生能源投资组合标准的评估","authors":"Ipshita Chaturvedi","doi":"10.3233/RED-120112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, a strong interest in renewable energy and supporting policies have burgeoned. The most popular of these are Renewable Portfolio Standards and Feed-in-Tariff systems. A policy of choice may be implemented by an entire country such as Feed-in-Tariffs in Germany and Japan and/or could be state-specific within a country. This article studies the existing literature to understand the theoretical and normative workings of both policies and argues that while both policies together and/or separately have proven pros and cons, the future of renewables must depend on case-specific factors. One size usually does not fit all, certainly not when determining a renewables future. While a basic policy may be determined, the nuances have to be localized depending on a country and state's tax structure, renewable energy availability and other such factors.","PeriodicalId":17166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Resources, Energy, and Development","volume":"4 1","pages":"55-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Future of Renewables: an Appraisal of Feed-in-Tariffs and Renewable Portfolio Standards\",\"authors\":\"Ipshita Chaturvedi\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/RED-120112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, a strong interest in renewable energy and supporting policies have burgeoned. The most popular of these are Renewable Portfolio Standards and Feed-in-Tariff systems. A policy of choice may be implemented by an entire country such as Feed-in-Tariffs in Germany and Japan and/or could be state-specific within a country. This article studies the existing literature to understand the theoretical and normative workings of both policies and argues that while both policies together and/or separately have proven pros and cons, the future of renewables must depend on case-specific factors. One size usually does not fit all, certainly not when determining a renewables future. While a basic policy may be determined, the nuances have to be localized depending on a country and state's tax structure, renewable energy availability and other such factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Resources, Energy, and Development\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"55-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Resources, Energy, and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/RED-120112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Resources, Energy, and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/RED-120112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,人们对可再生能源产生了浓厚的兴趣,并出台了相应的扶持政策。其中最受欢迎的是可再生能源投资组合标准和上网电价制度。所选择的政策可以在整个国家实施,如德国和日本的上网电价,也可以在一个国家内具体到州。本文研究了现有文献,以了解这两项政策的理论和规范运作,并认为尽管这两项政策共同或单独证明了利弊,但可再生能源的未来必须取决于具体情况。一个标准通常不适合所有人,在决定可再生能源的未来时当然不适合。虽然可以确定基本政策,但细微差别必须根据国家和州的税收结构、可再生能源的可用性和其他诸如此类的因素进行本地化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Future of Renewables: an Appraisal of Feed-in-Tariffs and Renewable Portfolio Standards
In recent years, a strong interest in renewable energy and supporting policies have burgeoned. The most popular of these are Renewable Portfolio Standards and Feed-in-Tariff systems. A policy of choice may be implemented by an entire country such as Feed-in-Tariffs in Germany and Japan and/or could be state-specific within a country. This article studies the existing literature to understand the theoretical and normative workings of both policies and argues that while both policies together and/or separately have proven pros and cons, the future of renewables must depend on case-specific factors. One size usually does not fit all, certainly not when determining a renewables future. While a basic policy may be determined, the nuances have to be localized depending on a country and state's tax structure, renewable energy availability and other such factors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Enterprises, Mission Drift, and Mitigation Strategies The Impact of Coastal Regulation Zone Legislation on City Development: A Study with Reference to Mumbai Importance of Data in Plastic Waste Management in India Anthropological Study of a Typical Drought-Prone Village in India: Strategies for Sustainable Rural Habitat Insights from Big Spatial Data through Machine Learning Techniques for Prudent Management of Natural Resources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1