英国就业服务:了解动态战略行动领域的供应商战略

IF 4.3 2区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Policy and Politics Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI:10.1332/030557314X14079275800414
Rebecca Taylor, J. Rees, C. Damm
{"title":"英国就业服务:了解动态战略行动领域的供应商战略","authors":"Rebecca Taylor, J. Rees, C. Damm","doi":"10.1332/030557314X14079275800414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"UK employment services are increasingly delivered by public, private and third sector organisations \nin quasi-markets that can be viewed as fields with actors (providers) competing for resources and \nposition. The commissioning of the Work Programme produced an ‘episode of contention’ as fewer \nresources, shifting policy priorities and new contractual arrangements restructured relationships \nwithin the field. Drawing on empirical research the paper demonstrates how providers with different \nresources have navigated this period, employing strategies to manage challenger and incumbent \nroles and maintain their position in the field. The findings contribute to both field theory and our \ntheoretical understanding of employment services. \nkey words employment services • Work Programme commissioning • sector • field theory","PeriodicalId":47631,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Politics","volume":"30 1","pages":"253-267"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UK employment services: understanding provider strategies in a dynamic strategic action field\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Taylor, J. Rees, C. Damm\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/030557314X14079275800414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"UK employment services are increasingly delivered by public, private and third sector organisations \\nin quasi-markets that can be viewed as fields with actors (providers) competing for resources and \\nposition. The commissioning of the Work Programme produced an ‘episode of contention’ as fewer \\nresources, shifting policy priorities and new contractual arrangements restructured relationships \\nwithin the field. Drawing on empirical research the paper demonstrates how providers with different \\nresources have navigated this period, employing strategies to manage challenger and incumbent \\nroles and maintain their position in the field. The findings contribute to both field theory and our \\ntheoretical understanding of employment services. \\nkey words employment services • Work Programme commissioning • sector • field theory\",\"PeriodicalId\":47631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy and Politics\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"253-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/030557314X14079275800414\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/030557314X14079275800414","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

英国的就业服务越来越多地由准市场中的公共、私营和第三部门组织提供,准市场可以被视为参与者(提供者)争夺资源和地位的领域。由于资源减少、政策优先次序改变和新的合同安排重新调整了外地内的关系,工作方案的委托产生了“争论事件”。根据实证研究,本文展示了拥有不同资源的供应商如何度过这一时期,采用策略来管理挑战者和现任者的角色,并保持其在该领域的地位。研究结果有助于实地理论和我们对就业服务的理论理解。关键词就业服务•工作方案调试•部门•现场理论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
UK employment services: understanding provider strategies in a dynamic strategic action field
UK employment services are increasingly delivered by public, private and third sector organisations in quasi-markets that can be viewed as fields with actors (providers) competing for resources and position. The commissioning of the Work Programme produced an ‘episode of contention’ as fewer resources, shifting policy priorities and new contractual arrangements restructured relationships within the field. Drawing on empirical research the paper demonstrates how providers with different resources have navigated this period, employing strategies to manage challenger and incumbent roles and maintain their position in the field. The findings contribute to both field theory and our theoretical understanding of employment services. key words employment services • Work Programme commissioning • sector • field theory
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
The racialisation of sexism: how race frames shape anti-street harassment policies in Britain and France Concluding discussion: key themes in the (possible) move to co-production and co-creation in public management A theoretical framework for studying the co-creation of innovative solutions and public value Collaborative governance and innovation in public services settings Digital platforms for the co-creation of public value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1