F.B. EYES: j·埃德加·胡佛的“鬼读者”如何框定了非裔美国文学

Jared Leighton
{"title":"F.B. EYES: j·埃德加·胡佛的“鬼读者”如何框定了非裔美国文学","authors":"Jared Leighton","doi":"10.1093/JAHIST/JAW289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"F.B. EYES: How J. Edgar Hoover's Ghostreaders Framed African American Literature. By William J. Maxwell. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2015.In F.B. Eyes, William J. Maxwell sets out to analyze the relationship between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and African American writers over the span of more than five decades. Maxwell does an excellent job in thoroughly exploring FBI investigations of black writers and this unique writer-critic interplay.Maxwell has organized his book into five chapters, each of which sets out to prove a thesis. Thesis 1 argues that the birth of the bureau and Hoover ensured the FBI's attention to African American literature. Maxwell looks to Hoover's racial background, with speculation on his black lineage, as well as his formative years in a racially exclusive environment. He then examines the coincident birth of the Harlem Renaissance and the creation of the FBI and Hoover's efforts to compile and index writing by New Negroes, searching their publications for evidence of radicalism and sedition. Thesis 2 builds on this point by arguing that the FBI's collection and analysis of black literature was important to the bureau's evolution under Hoover's leadership. Maxwell discusses the height of the investigation of black writers during World War II and how FBI agents imitated black radical writing-engaging in a form of minstrelsy-during the Counter Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) era (1956-1971).Thesis 3 contends that the bureau is the most important forgotten critic of African American literature and examines the life and work of two FBI critic-spies, Robert Adger Bowen and William C. Sullivan. Maxwell shows how the bureau adopted New Critical reading, searching for multiple meanings and hidden assumptions in black literature, believing that it was meant to teach and convert its audience to radical activism. Thesis 4 turns its attention to FBI investigations of black writers in exile, translations of foreignlanguage material, and attempts to direct and restrict travel, arguing that Hoover's agents were important in defining the Black Atlantic in the twentieth century. Finally, Thesis 5 looks at how black writers responded and asserts that their consciousness of bureau ghostreading created an important vein in African American literature. Maxwell discusses a number of authors, including Richard Wright and Ralph Ellison, analyzing how the bureau and state surveillance were treated in their works. …","PeriodicalId":30064,"journal":{"name":"American Studies Journal","volume":"215 1","pages":"179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"F.B. EYES: How J. Edgar Hoover's Ghostreaders Framed African American Literature\",\"authors\":\"Jared Leighton\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/JAHIST/JAW289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"F.B. EYES: How J. Edgar Hoover's Ghostreaders Framed African American Literature. By William J. Maxwell. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2015.In F.B. Eyes, William J. Maxwell sets out to analyze the relationship between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and African American writers over the span of more than five decades. Maxwell does an excellent job in thoroughly exploring FBI investigations of black writers and this unique writer-critic interplay.Maxwell has organized his book into five chapters, each of which sets out to prove a thesis. Thesis 1 argues that the birth of the bureau and Hoover ensured the FBI's attention to African American literature. Maxwell looks to Hoover's racial background, with speculation on his black lineage, as well as his formative years in a racially exclusive environment. He then examines the coincident birth of the Harlem Renaissance and the creation of the FBI and Hoover's efforts to compile and index writing by New Negroes, searching their publications for evidence of radicalism and sedition. Thesis 2 builds on this point by arguing that the FBI's collection and analysis of black literature was important to the bureau's evolution under Hoover's leadership. Maxwell discusses the height of the investigation of black writers during World War II and how FBI agents imitated black radical writing-engaging in a form of minstrelsy-during the Counter Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) era (1956-1971).Thesis 3 contends that the bureau is the most important forgotten critic of African American literature and examines the life and work of two FBI critic-spies, Robert Adger Bowen and William C. Sullivan. Maxwell shows how the bureau adopted New Critical reading, searching for multiple meanings and hidden assumptions in black literature, believing that it was meant to teach and convert its audience to radical activism. Thesis 4 turns its attention to FBI investigations of black writers in exile, translations of foreignlanguage material, and attempts to direct and restrict travel, arguing that Hoover's agents were important in defining the Black Atlantic in the twentieth century. Finally, Thesis 5 looks at how black writers responded and asserts that their consciousness of bureau ghostreading created an important vein in African American literature. Maxwell discusses a number of authors, including Richard Wright and Ralph Ellison, analyzing how the bureau and state surveillance were treated in their works. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":30064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"215 1\",\"pages\":\"179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/JAHIST/JAW289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/JAHIST/JAW289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

F.B. EYES: j·埃德加·胡佛的“鬼读者”如何框定了非裔美国文学。威廉·j·麦克斯韦著。普林斯顿,新泽西州:普林斯顿大学出版社,2015。在《fbi之眼》一书中,威廉·j·麦克斯韦(William J. Maxwell)着手分析了50多年来联邦调查局与非裔美国作家之间的关系。麦克斯韦在深入探讨联邦调查局对黑人作家的调查以及这种独特的作家与评论家之间的相互作用方面做得非常出色。麦克斯韦把他的书分成五章,每章都是为了证明一个论点。论文一认为FBI和胡佛的诞生确保了FBI对非裔美国人文学的关注。麦克斯韦尔着眼于胡佛的种族背景,推测他的黑人血统,以及他在一个种族排外的环境中成长的岁月。然后,他研究了哈莱姆文艺复兴运动的诞生与联邦调查局的成立,以及胡佛为新黑人的作品编纂和索引所做的努力,他在新黑人的出版物中寻找激进主义和煽动叛乱的证据。论文二以这一点为基础,论证联邦调查局对黑人文学的收集和分析对胡佛领导下联邦调查局的发展至关重要。麦克斯韦尔讨论了二战期间对黑人作家调查的高度,以及在反情报计划(1956-1971)时期,联邦调查局特工如何模仿黑人激进写作——以一种诗歌的形式参与其中。论文3认为FBI是最重要的被遗忘的非裔美国文学批评家,并考察了两位FBI批评家间谍Robert Adger Bowen和William C. Sullivan的生活和工作。麦克斯韦展示了该局如何采用新批评阅读,在黑人文学中寻找多重意义和隐藏的假设,相信它的目的是教导和转变读者的激进主义。论文4将注意力转向联邦调查局对流亡黑人作家的调查、外文材料的翻译,以及指导和限制旅行的企图,认为胡佛的特工在定义20世纪的黑人大西洋方面发挥了重要作用。最后,论文5着眼于黑人作家是如何回应的,并断言他们对办公室幽灵阅读的意识在非裔美国文学中创造了一个重要的脉络。麦克斯韦尔讨论了包括理查德·赖特(Richard Wright)和拉尔夫·埃里森(Ralph Ellison)在内的许多作家,分析了他们的作品中如何对待联邦调查局和国家监控。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
F.B. EYES: How J. Edgar Hoover's Ghostreaders Framed African American Literature
F.B. EYES: How J. Edgar Hoover's Ghostreaders Framed African American Literature. By William J. Maxwell. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2015.In F.B. Eyes, William J. Maxwell sets out to analyze the relationship between the Federal Bureau of Investigation and African American writers over the span of more than five decades. Maxwell does an excellent job in thoroughly exploring FBI investigations of black writers and this unique writer-critic interplay.Maxwell has organized his book into five chapters, each of which sets out to prove a thesis. Thesis 1 argues that the birth of the bureau and Hoover ensured the FBI's attention to African American literature. Maxwell looks to Hoover's racial background, with speculation on his black lineage, as well as his formative years in a racially exclusive environment. He then examines the coincident birth of the Harlem Renaissance and the creation of the FBI and Hoover's efforts to compile and index writing by New Negroes, searching their publications for evidence of radicalism and sedition. Thesis 2 builds on this point by arguing that the FBI's collection and analysis of black literature was important to the bureau's evolution under Hoover's leadership. Maxwell discusses the height of the investigation of black writers during World War II and how FBI agents imitated black radical writing-engaging in a form of minstrelsy-during the Counter Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO) era (1956-1971).Thesis 3 contends that the bureau is the most important forgotten critic of African American literature and examines the life and work of two FBI critic-spies, Robert Adger Bowen and William C. Sullivan. Maxwell shows how the bureau adopted New Critical reading, searching for multiple meanings and hidden assumptions in black literature, believing that it was meant to teach and convert its audience to radical activism. Thesis 4 turns its attention to FBI investigations of black writers in exile, translations of foreignlanguage material, and attempts to direct and restrict travel, arguing that Hoover's agents were important in defining the Black Atlantic in the twentieth century. Finally, Thesis 5 looks at how black writers responded and asserts that their consciousness of bureau ghostreading created an important vein in African American literature. Maxwell discusses a number of authors, including Richard Wright and Ralph Ellison, analyzing how the bureau and state surveillance were treated in their works. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Spending Time in the Nineteenth Century Melville’s Majestic Missive:“Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street” Ishmael’s Night of Rest and Relaxation Data, Maps, Networks – Digital Approaches to Reading (in) Nineteenth-Century Literature Making Love Public: The Paradoxes of Intimacy in Henry James’s The Wings of the Dove
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1