俄罗斯首次儿童扁平足诊断与治疗德尔菲调查结果

A. Dimitrieva, V. Kenis, Irina Yu. Klychkova, Andrey V. Sapogovskiy, Vadim V. Kozhevnikov
{"title":"俄罗斯首次儿童扁平足诊断与治疗德尔菲调查结果","authors":"A. Dimitrieva, V. Kenis, Irina Yu. Klychkova, Andrey V. Sapogovskiy, Vadim V. Kozhevnikov","doi":"10.17816/ptors112465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: To date, there is no consensus regarding the diagnostics of flatfoot in children and approaches to its classification and treatment. \nAIM: This study aimed to demonstrate the results of the first Russian consensus, performed according to the Delphi method, for the diagnostics and treatment of flatfoot in children. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Delphi survey and the RAND/UCLA and participated by 22 experts in their field. The questionnaire consisted of four main sections, namely, general clinical assessment, flatfoot diagnosis, classification approach, and treatment, including 179 close-ended and 11 open-ended statements in both rounds. A 5-point Likert scale was used to rank responses. The level of agreement was determined as follows: 70% of the experts agrees, the statement is accepted; 55%, rejected; 55%69%, reassessment by experts in subsequent rounds. To assess agreement among experts, parameters such as general agreement, agreement without doubt by experts, and percentage of doubting experts were calculated. Mean (M), standard deviation (SD), and Cronbachs alpha were calculated. \nRESULTS: The statement was accepted with an agreement without doubt by experts 70%, with Cronbachs alpha of 0.8. According to the survey data, in the two rounds using 179 close-ended statements, 96 statements were accepted, 63 were rejected, and no consensus was reached on 20. \nCONCLUSIONS: This scientific work presents the results of the first Russian Delphi survey on the diagnosis and treatment of flatfoot in children with a unique number of experts (n = 22). The lack of agreement on some of the statements, even among experts, showed that consensus was a necessary first step toward standardizing the diagnosis and treatment of flatfoot in children.","PeriodicalId":37631,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of the first Russian Delphi survey on the diagnosis and treatment of flatfoot in children\",\"authors\":\"A. Dimitrieva, V. Kenis, Irina Yu. Klychkova, Andrey V. Sapogovskiy, Vadim V. Kozhevnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/ptors112465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: To date, there is no consensus regarding the diagnostics of flatfoot in children and approaches to its classification and treatment. \\nAIM: This study aimed to demonstrate the results of the first Russian consensus, performed according to the Delphi method, for the diagnostics and treatment of flatfoot in children. \\nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Delphi survey and the RAND/UCLA and participated by 22 experts in their field. The questionnaire consisted of four main sections, namely, general clinical assessment, flatfoot diagnosis, classification approach, and treatment, including 179 close-ended and 11 open-ended statements in both rounds. A 5-point Likert scale was used to rank responses. The level of agreement was determined as follows: 70% of the experts agrees, the statement is accepted; 55%, rejected; 55%69%, reassessment by experts in subsequent rounds. To assess agreement among experts, parameters such as general agreement, agreement without doubt by experts, and percentage of doubting experts were calculated. Mean (M), standard deviation (SD), and Cronbachs alpha were calculated. \\nRESULTS: The statement was accepted with an agreement without doubt by experts 70%, with Cronbachs alpha of 0.8. According to the survey data, in the two rounds using 179 close-ended statements, 96 statements were accepted, 63 were rejected, and no consensus was reached on 20. \\nCONCLUSIONS: This scientific work presents the results of the first Russian Delphi survey on the diagnosis and treatment of flatfoot in children with a unique number of experts (n = 22). The lack of agreement on some of the statements, even among experts, showed that consensus was a necessary first step toward standardizing the diagnosis and treatment of flatfoot in children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/ptors112465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/ptors112465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:迄今为止,关于儿童扁平足的诊断及其分类和治疗方法尚无共识。目的:本研究旨在证明根据德尔菲法进行的俄罗斯第一共识的结果,用于诊断和治疗儿童扁平足。材料和方法:本研究按照德尔菲调查和兰德/加州大学洛杉矶分校的原则进行,共有22名各自领域的专家参与。问卷包括一般临床评估、扁平足诊断、分类方法和治疗四个主要部分,两轮问卷均包括179个封闭式陈述和11个开放式陈述。采用5分李克特量表对回答进行排名。同意程度确定为:70%的专家同意,声明被接受;55%,拒绝;55%, 69%,在随后的几轮中由专家重新评估。为了评估专家之间的协议,计算了一般协议、专家毫无疑问的协议和怀疑专家的百分比等参数。计算均值(M)、标准差(SD)和cronbach alpha。结果:专家对该观点的认同率为70%,cronbach alpha值为0.8。根据调查数据,在两轮使用179个封闭式语句中,96个语句被接受,63个被拒绝,20个未达成共识。结论:这项科学工作展示了俄罗斯首次德尔菲调查的结果,该调查涉及儿童扁平足的诊断和治疗,专家人数独特(n = 22)。即使在专家之间,对一些声明也缺乏共识,这表明共识是标准化儿童扁平足诊断和治疗的必要的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Results of the first Russian Delphi survey on the diagnosis and treatment of flatfoot in children
BACKGROUND: To date, there is no consensus regarding the diagnostics of flatfoot in children and approaches to its classification and treatment. AIM: This study aimed to demonstrate the results of the first Russian consensus, performed according to the Delphi method, for the diagnostics and treatment of flatfoot in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Delphi survey and the RAND/UCLA and participated by 22 experts in their field. The questionnaire consisted of four main sections, namely, general clinical assessment, flatfoot diagnosis, classification approach, and treatment, including 179 close-ended and 11 open-ended statements in both rounds. A 5-point Likert scale was used to rank responses. The level of agreement was determined as follows: 70% of the experts agrees, the statement is accepted; 55%, rejected; 55%69%, reassessment by experts in subsequent rounds. To assess agreement among experts, parameters such as general agreement, agreement without doubt by experts, and percentage of doubting experts were calculated. Mean (M), standard deviation (SD), and Cronbachs alpha were calculated. RESULTS: The statement was accepted with an agreement without doubt by experts 70%, with Cronbachs alpha of 0.8. According to the survey data, in the two rounds using 179 close-ended statements, 96 statements were accepted, 63 were rejected, and no consensus was reached on 20. CONCLUSIONS: This scientific work presents the results of the first Russian Delphi survey on the diagnosis and treatment of flatfoot in children with a unique number of experts (n = 22). The lack of agreement on some of the statements, even among experts, showed that consensus was a necessary first step toward standardizing the diagnosis and treatment of flatfoot in children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery
Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The target audience of the journal is researches, physicians, orthopedic trauma, burn, and pediatric surgeons, anesthesiologists, pediatricians, neurologists, oral surgeons, and all specialists in related fields of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Pitfalls and complications in the treatment of clubfoot by the Ponseti method: A literature review Dynamics of feet dorsiflexion after percutaneous Achilles lengthening for correction of flat feet in children Musculoskeletal injuries and pain in children involved in sports: A literature review Risk factors for the development of congenital giant nevi in children Comparative analysis of the detection of diseases of the muscular system in minors of Saint Petersburg
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1