从汇率升值的证据看加价和错配

Ariel Weinberger
{"title":"从汇率升值的证据看加价和错配","authors":"Ariel Weinberger","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2644604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With non-homothetic preferences, a monopolistic competition equilibrium is inefficient. In a setting with heterogeneous firms that charge variable markups, this paper finds a sufficient statistic for changes in allocative efficiency that can be directly measured with data. The model also predicts differential effects of competition and cost shocks on the reallocation across domestic firms, which I test empirically with firm and industry-level data in Chile, a country that has experienced large exchange rate shocks. I find important changes in misallocation over time due to the way firms pass-through productivity gains into markups. From industry-year variation, there is evidence that industries that import a larger share of their inputs become more misallocated as a result of exchange rate appreciations compared to “open” sectors whose output competition becomes fiercer. The observations of markup responses at the firm level are consistent with the aggregate measure of allocative efficiency.","PeriodicalId":18190,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Economics eJournal","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Markups and Misallocation with Evidence from an Exchange Rate Appreciation\",\"authors\":\"Ariel Weinberger\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2644604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With non-homothetic preferences, a monopolistic competition equilibrium is inefficient. In a setting with heterogeneous firms that charge variable markups, this paper finds a sufficient statistic for changes in allocative efficiency that can be directly measured with data. The model also predicts differential effects of competition and cost shocks on the reallocation across domestic firms, which I test empirically with firm and industry-level data in Chile, a country that has experienced large exchange rate shocks. I find important changes in misallocation over time due to the way firms pass-through productivity gains into markups. From industry-year variation, there is evidence that industries that import a larger share of their inputs become more misallocated as a result of exchange rate appreciations compared to “open” sectors whose output competition becomes fiercer. The observations of markup responses at the firm level are consistent with the aggregate measure of allocative efficiency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2644604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2644604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

对于非同质偏好,垄断竞争均衡是低效的。在异质性企业收取可变加成的情况下,本文找到了一个可以直接用数据衡量的配置效率变化的充分统计量。该模型还预测了竞争和成本冲击对国内企业再配置的不同影响,我用智利的企业和行业层面的数据进行了实证检验,智利经历了巨大的汇率冲击。我发现,随着时间的推移,由于企业将生产率提高转化为加价的方式,错配会发生重要变化。从行业-年度变化来看,有证据表明,与产出竞争更加激烈的“开放”部门相比,进口投入份额较大的行业由于汇率升值而更容易配置不当。对企业加价反应的观察结果与对配置效率的总体衡量是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Markups and Misallocation with Evidence from an Exchange Rate Appreciation
With non-homothetic preferences, a monopolistic competition equilibrium is inefficient. In a setting with heterogeneous firms that charge variable markups, this paper finds a sufficient statistic for changes in allocative efficiency that can be directly measured with data. The model also predicts differential effects of competition and cost shocks on the reallocation across domestic firms, which I test empirically with firm and industry-level data in Chile, a country that has experienced large exchange rate shocks. I find important changes in misallocation over time due to the way firms pass-through productivity gains into markups. From industry-year variation, there is evidence that industries that import a larger share of their inputs become more misallocated as a result of exchange rate appreciations compared to “open” sectors whose output competition becomes fiercer. The observations of markup responses at the firm level are consistent with the aggregate measure of allocative efficiency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Esbozo de un análisis socioeconómico del sector agrícola en Colombia, 2000-2020 (Outline of a Socio-Economic Analysis of the Agricultural Sector in Colombia, 2000-2020) Sectoral Real Exchange Rates and Manufacturing Exports: A Case Study of Latin America Social Networks and (Political) Assimilation in the Age of Mass Migration Greater Female Employment Participation as a Catalyst to Reducing Income Inequality in Developing Countries – The Case of Latin American and Sub-Saharan African Countries What Makes a Tax Evader?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1