生物识别认证系统中机器学习安全性的几何分析

Koosha Sadeghi, Ayan Banerjee, Javad Sohankar, S. Gupta
{"title":"生物识别认证系统中机器学习安全性的几何分析","authors":"Koosha Sadeghi, Ayan Banerjee, Javad Sohankar, S. Gupta","doi":"10.1109/ICMLA.2017.0-142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feature extraction and Machine Learning (ML) techniques are required to reduce high variability of biometric data in Biometric Authentication Systems (BAS) toward improving system utilization (acceptance of legitimate subjects). However, reduction in data variability, also decreases the adversary’s effort in manufacturing legitimate biometric data to break the system (security strength). Typically for BAS design, security strength is evaluated through variability analysis on data, regardless of feature extraction and ML, which are essential for accurate evaluation. In this research, we provide a geometrical method to measure the security strength in BAS, which analyzes the effects of feature extraction and ML on the biometric data. Using the proposed method, we evaluate the security strength of five state-of-the-art electroencephalogram-based authentication systems, on data from 106 subjects, and the maximum achievable security strength is 83 bits.","PeriodicalId":6636,"journal":{"name":"2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)","volume":"46 1","pages":"309-314"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geometrical Analysis of Machine Learning Security in Biometric Authentication Systems\",\"authors\":\"Koosha Sadeghi, Ayan Banerjee, Javad Sohankar, S. Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICMLA.2017.0-142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Feature extraction and Machine Learning (ML) techniques are required to reduce high variability of biometric data in Biometric Authentication Systems (BAS) toward improving system utilization (acceptance of legitimate subjects). However, reduction in data variability, also decreases the adversary’s effort in manufacturing legitimate biometric data to break the system (security strength). Typically for BAS design, security strength is evaluated through variability analysis on data, regardless of feature extraction and ML, which are essential for accurate evaluation. In this research, we provide a geometrical method to measure the security strength in BAS, which analyzes the effects of feature extraction and ML on the biometric data. Using the proposed method, we evaluate the security strength of five state-of-the-art electroencephalogram-based authentication systems, on data from 106 subjects, and the maximum achievable security strength is 83 bits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"309-314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2017.0-142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 16th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2017.0-142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

特征提取和机器学习(ML)技术需要减少生物识别认证系统(BAS)中生物识别数据的高度可变性,以提高系统利用率(接受合法主体)。然而,数据可变性的减少也减少了攻击者制造合法生物识别数据来破坏系统的努力(安全强度)。通常在BAS设计中,安全强度是通过对数据的可变性分析来评估的,而不考虑特征提取和ML,这对准确评估至关重要。在本研究中,我们提供了一种几何方法来测量BAS的安全强度,分析了特征提取和ML对生物特征数据的影响。使用所提出的方法,我们评估了五种最先进的基于脑电图的认证系统的安全强度,来自106个受试者的数据,最大可实现的安全强度为83位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geometrical Analysis of Machine Learning Security in Biometric Authentication Systems
Feature extraction and Machine Learning (ML) techniques are required to reduce high variability of biometric data in Biometric Authentication Systems (BAS) toward improving system utilization (acceptance of legitimate subjects). However, reduction in data variability, also decreases the adversary’s effort in manufacturing legitimate biometric data to break the system (security strength). Typically for BAS design, security strength is evaluated through variability analysis on data, regardless of feature extraction and ML, which are essential for accurate evaluation. In this research, we provide a geometrical method to measure the security strength in BAS, which analyzes the effects of feature extraction and ML on the biometric data. Using the proposed method, we evaluate the security strength of five state-of-the-art electroencephalogram-based authentication systems, on data from 106 subjects, and the maximum achievable security strength is 83 bits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tree-Structured Curriculum Learning Based on Semantic Similarity of Text Direct Multiclass Boosting Using Base Classifiers' Posterior Probabilities Estimates Predicting Psychosis Using the Experience Sampling Method with Mobile Apps Human Action Recognition from Body-Part Directional Velocity Using Hidden Markov Models Realistic Traffic Generation for Web Robots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1