评价使用上下文分类系统开发交叉口安全性能函数的效益

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Journal of Transportation Safety & Security Pub Date : 2021-06-02 DOI:10.1080/19439962.2021.1933285
Ghalia Gamaleldin, H. Al-Deek, Adrian Sandt, John McCombs
{"title":"评价使用上下文分类系统开发交叉口安全性能函数的效益","authors":"Ghalia Gamaleldin, H. Al-Deek, Adrian Sandt, John McCombs","doi":"10.1080/19439962.2021.1933285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Safety performance functions (SPFs) are used to predict intersection crashes. Unlike previous studies, which only used the three categories outlined in the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) to develop SPFs, this research developed SPFs based on a new context classification system developed by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) which categorizes intersections into eight context categories. Two types of comparisons were used to evaluate the benefits of context-specific SPFs for the C3R-Suburban Residential and C4-Urban General context categories. First, individual intersection group SPFs were developed for unsignalized and signalized 3-leg and 4-leg intersection groups within each category. These individual SPFs were then compared to full category SPFs using data from all four intersection groups. The individual SPFs typically had lower performance measure values and more accurate crash predictions than the full SPFs while containing additional variables. For example, FDOT District 7 and major median were significant in several individual C3R SPFs but not in the full SPF. Next, comparisons were made between context-specific SPFs and HSM SPFs for two intersection groups (C3R signalized 4-leg and C4 unsignalized 3-leg). The context-specific SPFs outperformed the HSM SPFs in predicting multi-vehicle crashes, demonstrating the improved benefits that agencies can gain by developing context-specific SPFs.","PeriodicalId":46672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security","volume":"18 1","pages":"1490 - 1509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the benefits of using a context classification system to develop intersection safety performance functions\",\"authors\":\"Ghalia Gamaleldin, H. Al-Deek, Adrian Sandt, John McCombs\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19439962.2021.1933285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Safety performance functions (SPFs) are used to predict intersection crashes. Unlike previous studies, which only used the three categories outlined in the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) to develop SPFs, this research developed SPFs based on a new context classification system developed by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) which categorizes intersections into eight context categories. Two types of comparisons were used to evaluate the benefits of context-specific SPFs for the C3R-Suburban Residential and C4-Urban General context categories. First, individual intersection group SPFs were developed for unsignalized and signalized 3-leg and 4-leg intersection groups within each category. These individual SPFs were then compared to full category SPFs using data from all four intersection groups. The individual SPFs typically had lower performance measure values and more accurate crash predictions than the full SPFs while containing additional variables. For example, FDOT District 7 and major median were significant in several individual C3R SPFs but not in the full SPF. Next, comparisons were made between context-specific SPFs and HSM SPFs for two intersection groups (C3R signalized 4-leg and C4 unsignalized 3-leg). The context-specific SPFs outperformed the HSM SPFs in predicting multi-vehicle crashes, demonstrating the improved benefits that agencies can gain by developing context-specific SPFs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"1490 - 1509\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2021.1933285\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transportation Safety & Security","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2021.1933285","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要安全性能函数(SPFs)用于交叉口碰撞预测。与以往的研究不同,以往的研究只使用公路安全手册(HSM)中概述的三个类别来开发spf,本研究基于佛罗里达州交通部(FDOT)开发的一种新的情境分类系统来开发spf,该系统将十字路口分为八个情境类别。采用两种类型的比较来评估c3r -郊区住宅和c4 -城市一般环境类别的特定环境spf的效益。首先,对每个类别中无信号和有信号的3腿和4腿交叉口组分别建立了单独的交叉口组spf。然后使用所有四个交叉组的数据将这些个体spf与完整类别spf进行比较。与包含额外变量的完整spf相比,单个spf通常具有较低的性能度量值和更准确的崩溃预测。例如,FDOT第7区和主要中位数在几个单独的C3R SPF中显着,但在整个SPF中不显着。接下来,比较了两个交叉组(C3R信号4-leg和C4无信号3-leg)的上下文特异性spf和HSM spf。在预测多车碰撞事故方面,特定环境的SPFs优于HSM SPFs,这表明机构可以通过开发特定环境的SPFs获得更好的收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the benefits of using a context classification system to develop intersection safety performance functions
Abstract Safety performance functions (SPFs) are used to predict intersection crashes. Unlike previous studies, which only used the three categories outlined in the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) to develop SPFs, this research developed SPFs based on a new context classification system developed by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) which categorizes intersections into eight context categories. Two types of comparisons were used to evaluate the benefits of context-specific SPFs for the C3R-Suburban Residential and C4-Urban General context categories. First, individual intersection group SPFs were developed for unsignalized and signalized 3-leg and 4-leg intersection groups within each category. These individual SPFs were then compared to full category SPFs using data from all four intersection groups. The individual SPFs typically had lower performance measure values and more accurate crash predictions than the full SPFs while containing additional variables. For example, FDOT District 7 and major median were significant in several individual C3R SPFs but not in the full SPF. Next, comparisons were made between context-specific SPFs and HSM SPFs for two intersection groups (C3R signalized 4-leg and C4 unsignalized 3-leg). The context-specific SPFs outperformed the HSM SPFs in predicting multi-vehicle crashes, demonstrating the improved benefits that agencies can gain by developing context-specific SPFs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Examining the crash risk factors associated with cycling by considering spatial and temporal disaggregation of exposure: Findings from four Dutch cities Traffic safety performance evaluation in a connected vehicle environment with queue warning and speed harmonization applications Enhancing bicyclist survival time in fatal crashes: Investigating the impact of faster crash notification time through explainable machine learning Factors affecting pedestrian injury severity in pedestrian-vehicle crashes: Insights from a data mining and mixed logit model approach Prediction of high-risk bus drivers characterized by aggressive driving behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1