Luiz Felipe Tavares, Inae Caroline Gadotti, Bruna Guimaraes Carvalho, Ana Paula Mendonça Fernandes, Jade Padilha Silva, Gustavo Augusto Seabra Barbosa, Erika Oliveira Almeida, Karyna Figueiredo Ribeiro
{"title":"不同类型的颞下颌关节紊乱症的颈部疼痛、残疾和颈深屈肌表现是否相同？","authors":"Luiz Felipe Tavares, Inae Caroline Gadotti, Bruna Guimaraes Carvalho, Ana Paula Mendonça Fernandes, Jade Padilha Silva, Gustavo Augusto Seabra Barbosa, Erika Oliveira Almeida, Karyna Figueiredo Ribeiro","doi":"10.1080/08869634.2022.2052582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate neck pain, disability, and deep neck flexor (DNF) performance of individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty individuals were divided into the following: arthrogenic TMD (n = 40), myogenic TMD (n = 12), and mixed TMD (n = 28). Neck pain intensity, neck disability, and DNF performance were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with arthrogenic TMD reported lower intensity of neck pain when compared to mixed TMD (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Individuals with arthrogenic TMD had less neck disability than individuals with myogenic TMD (<i>p</i> = 0.037) and mixed TMD (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was found between neck pain and neck disability (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No differences were found for DNF performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neck pain and disability differs according to subtype of TMD, but performance of the deep neck flexors does not. Neck pain intensity and neck disability were correlated in patients with TMD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49313,"journal":{"name":"Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications","volume":"14 1","pages":"770-778"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are neck pain, disability, and deep neck flexor performance the same for the different types of temporomandibular disorders?\",\"authors\":\"Luiz Felipe Tavares, Inae Caroline Gadotti, Bruna Guimaraes Carvalho, Ana Paula Mendonça Fernandes, Jade Padilha Silva, Gustavo Augusto Seabra Barbosa, Erika Oliveira Almeida, Karyna Figueiredo Ribeiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08869634.2022.2052582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate neck pain, disability, and deep neck flexor (DNF) performance of individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighty individuals were divided into the following: arthrogenic TMD (n = 40), myogenic TMD (n = 12), and mixed TMD (n = 28). Neck pain intensity, neck disability, and DNF performance were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with arthrogenic TMD reported lower intensity of neck pain when compared to mixed TMD (<i>p</i> = 0.01). Individuals with arthrogenic TMD had less neck disability than individuals with myogenic TMD (<i>p</i> = 0.037) and mixed TMD (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was found between neck pain and neck disability (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No differences were found for DNF performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neck pain and disability differs according to subtype of TMD, but performance of the deep neck flexors does not. Neck pain intensity and neck disability were correlated in patients with TMD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"770-778\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2022.2052582\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peer-To-Peer Networking and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.2022.2052582","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are neck pain, disability, and deep neck flexor performance the same for the different types of temporomandibular disorders?
Objective: To evaluate neck pain, disability, and deep neck flexor (DNF) performance of individuals with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).
Methods: Eighty individuals were divided into the following: arthrogenic TMD (n = 40), myogenic TMD (n = 12), and mixed TMD (n = 28). Neck pain intensity, neck disability, and DNF performance were evaluated.
Results: Individuals with arthrogenic TMD reported lower intensity of neck pain when compared to mixed TMD (p = 0.01). Individuals with arthrogenic TMD had less neck disability than individuals with myogenic TMD (p = 0.037) and mixed TMD (p < 0.001). A moderate positive correlation was found between neck pain and neck disability (p < 0.001). No differences were found for DNF performance.
Conclusion: Neck pain and disability differs according to subtype of TMD, but performance of the deep neck flexors does not. Neck pain intensity and neck disability were correlated in patients with TMD.
期刊介绍：
The aim of the Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications journal is to disseminate state-of-the-art research and development results in this rapidly growing research area, to facilitate the deployment of P2P networking and applications, and to bring together the academic and industry communities, with the goal of fostering interaction to promote further research interests and activities, thus enabling new P2P applications and services. The journal not only addresses research topics related to networking and communications theory, but also considers the standardization, economic, and engineering aspects of P2P technologies, and their impacts on software engineering, computer engineering, networked communication, and security.
The journal serves as a forum for tackling the technical problems arising from both file sharing and media streaming applications. It also includes state-of-the-art technologies in the P2P security domain.
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications publishes regular papers, tutorials and review papers, case studies, and correspondence from the research, development, and standardization communities. Papers addressing system, application, and service issues are encouraged.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
