秋果树莓行间距和支撑系统的评价

F. Tabley, P. Rhodes, R. Haynes
{"title":"秋果树莓行间距和支撑系统的评价","authors":"F. Tabley, P. Rhodes, R. Haynes","doi":"10.1080/03015521.1988.10425629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The effects of three inter-row spacings (3 m, 1.5 m, and 0.75 m), and two support systems (training vertically or on a V-shaped trellis) on total yield, yield components, and ease of hand picking of autumn rasperries (Rubus idaeus L. ‘Heritage’) was investigated in a 3-year field trial in Canterbury. In the first year, number of fruiting canes/m2 and yields/ha were both increased as row spacings were reduced from 3 to 0.75 m. However, in the second and third seasons, although these parameters were increased as spacings were reduced from 3 to 1.5 m, a further reduction in spacing to 0.75 m had no effect. Neither the number of berries per fruiting cane nor yield per fruiting cane were significantly affected by row spacings, although there was a tendency for mean berry weight to increase as row spacing was reduced. Reducing row spacing from 1.5 to 0.75 m made access to rows difficult and reduced picking rate. Training canes on a V trellis had no significant effect on any of the measured parameters a...","PeriodicalId":19285,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture","volume":"50 1","pages":"137-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of row spacings and support systems for autumn-fruiting raspberries\",\"authors\":\"F. Tabley, P. Rhodes, R. Haynes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03015521.1988.10425629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The effects of three inter-row spacings (3 m, 1.5 m, and 0.75 m), and two support systems (training vertically or on a V-shaped trellis) on total yield, yield components, and ease of hand picking of autumn rasperries (Rubus idaeus L. ‘Heritage’) was investigated in a 3-year field trial in Canterbury. In the first year, number of fruiting canes/m2 and yields/ha were both increased as row spacings were reduced from 3 to 0.75 m. However, in the second and third seasons, although these parameters were increased as spacings were reduced from 3 to 1.5 m, a further reduction in spacing to 0.75 m had no effect. Neither the number of berries per fruiting cane nor yield per fruiting cane were significantly affected by row spacings, although there was a tendency for mean berry weight to increase as row spacing was reduced. Reducing row spacing from 1.5 to 0.75 m made access to rows difficult and reduced picking rate. Training canes on a V trellis had no significant effect on any of the measured parameters a...\",\"PeriodicalId\":19285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"137-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03015521.1988.10425629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03015521.1988.10425629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在坎特伯雷进行了为期3年的田间试验,研究了3种行距(3 m、1.5 m和0.75 m)和2种支撑系统(垂直或v型棚架)对秋莓(Rubus idaeus L. ' Heritage ')总产量、产量组成部分和手采便利性的影响。第1年,行距由3 ~ 0.75 m减少到3 ~ 0.75 m,亩产量均有提高。然而,在第二和第三季,虽然这些参数随着间距从3减小到1.5 m而增加,但间距进一步减小到0.75 m没有影响。行距对单株果实数和单株果实产量均无显著影响,但平均果实重有随行距减小而增加的趋势。将行距从1.5 m减少到0.75 m使获取行变得困难,并降低了采摘率。在V型网格上训练手杖对任何测量参数都没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of row spacings and support systems for autumn-fruiting raspberries
Abstract The effects of three inter-row spacings (3 m, 1.5 m, and 0.75 m), and two support systems (training vertically or on a V-shaped trellis) on total yield, yield components, and ease of hand picking of autumn rasperries (Rubus idaeus L. ‘Heritage’) was investigated in a 3-year field trial in Canterbury. In the first year, number of fruiting canes/m2 and yields/ha were both increased as row spacings were reduced from 3 to 0.75 m. However, in the second and third seasons, although these parameters were increased as spacings were reduced from 3 to 1.5 m, a further reduction in spacing to 0.75 m had no effect. Neither the number of berries per fruiting cane nor yield per fruiting cane were significantly affected by row spacings, although there was a tendency for mean berry weight to increase as row spacing was reduced. Reducing row spacing from 1.5 to 0.75 m made access to rows difficult and reduced picking rate. Training canes on a V trellis had no significant effect on any of the measured parameters a...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
‘Grasslands Tekapo’ cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) Sally Diane Newton M.Ag. Sci (Hons), Ph.D (Cant) 1952–1988 Changes in quality of ‘Red Delicious’ and ‘Golden Delicious’ apples following delayed cooling versus delayed establishment of controlled atmosphere storage Temperature studies on kiwifruit vines using relocatable greenhouses Preliminary investigation of a small fruit problem in kiwifruit, Actinidia deliciosa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1