克服障碍:包容性社会教育实践的地方和创新维度

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REMIE-Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research Pub Date : 2019-06-16 DOI:10.17583/REMIE.2019.4200
Fátima Antunes, J. Lúcio
{"title":"克服障碍:包容性社会教育实践的地方和创新维度","authors":"Fátima Antunes, J. Lúcio","doi":"10.17583/REMIE.2019.4200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses some results of a broader research, focusing on a set of eleven socio-educational practices aiming to overcome school failure and dropout, developed in Portugal, giving particular attention to the local and innovative dimensions. This research aims to understand the point of view of the several actors involved, about which factors, processes and relationships contribute the most to building such practices. Data was gathered through documental analysis and semi-structured interviews with those (institutionally) responsible for each practice under study, and was analysed using two instruments. From the point of view of the people responsible, the practices that contribute the most to overcoming school failure and dropout fall into one of four categories: Study Support (4 Practices), Student Grouping (3), Mediation (3) and Pedagogical Differentiation (1). Some practices mobilise resources; others interfere with learning and life contexts, in order to confront institutional, situational and dispositional barriers to participation and learning. Those practices seem to have an impact on school-family communication. Formal schooling, as well as the socio-cultural inclusion of youth from disadvantaged backgrounds, are seen as relevant; yet, we can observe a somewhat fragile involvement of families and communities in practices aimed at promoting their youth’s educational success.","PeriodicalId":42901,"journal":{"name":"REMIE-Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming Barriers: The Local and the Innovative Dimensions of Inclusive Socio-Educational Practices\",\"authors\":\"Fátima Antunes, J. Lúcio\",\"doi\":\"10.17583/REMIE.2019.4200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses some results of a broader research, focusing on a set of eleven socio-educational practices aiming to overcome school failure and dropout, developed in Portugal, giving particular attention to the local and innovative dimensions. This research aims to understand the point of view of the several actors involved, about which factors, processes and relationships contribute the most to building such practices. Data was gathered through documental analysis and semi-structured interviews with those (institutionally) responsible for each practice under study, and was analysed using two instruments. From the point of view of the people responsible, the practices that contribute the most to overcoming school failure and dropout fall into one of four categories: Study Support (4 Practices), Student Grouping (3), Mediation (3) and Pedagogical Differentiation (1). Some practices mobilise resources; others interfere with learning and life contexts, in order to confront institutional, situational and dispositional barriers to participation and learning. Those practices seem to have an impact on school-family communication. Formal schooling, as well as the socio-cultural inclusion of youth from disadvantaged backgrounds, are seen as relevant; yet, we can observe a somewhat fragile involvement of families and communities in practices aimed at promoting their youth’s educational success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REMIE-Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REMIE-Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17583/REMIE.2019.4200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REMIE-Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/REMIE.2019.4200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文讨论了一项更广泛的研究的一些结果,重点是在葡萄牙开发的一套旨在克服学业失败和辍学的11个社会教育实践,特别关注当地和创新方面。这项研究的目的是了解几个参与者的观点,关于哪些因素、过程和关系对建立这样的实践贡献最大。通过文献分析和与负责研究中的每个实践的(机构)人员的半结构化访谈收集数据,并使用两种工具进行分析。从负责人的角度来看,对克服学业失败和辍学贡献最大的做法可分为四类:学习支持(4种做法)、学生分组(3种做法)、调解(3种做法)和教学差异化(1种做法)。另一些人干预学习和生活环境,以面对参与和学习的制度、情境和性格障碍。这些做法似乎对学校与家庭的沟通产生了影响。正规学校教育以及弱势背景青年的社会文化融入被认为是相关的;然而,我们可以观察到,家庭和社区在促进青少年教育成功的实践中多少有些脆弱的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Overcoming Barriers: The Local and the Innovative Dimensions of Inclusive Socio-Educational Practices
This paper discusses some results of a broader research, focusing on a set of eleven socio-educational practices aiming to overcome school failure and dropout, developed in Portugal, giving particular attention to the local and innovative dimensions. This research aims to understand the point of view of the several actors involved, about which factors, processes and relationships contribute the most to building such practices. Data was gathered through documental analysis and semi-structured interviews with those (institutionally) responsible for each practice under study, and was analysed using two instruments. From the point of view of the people responsible, the practices that contribute the most to overcoming school failure and dropout fall into one of four categories: Study Support (4 Practices), Student Grouping (3), Mediation (3) and Pedagogical Differentiation (1). Some practices mobilise resources; others interfere with learning and life contexts, in order to confront institutional, situational and dispositional barriers to participation and learning. Those practices seem to have an impact on school-family communication. Formal schooling, as well as the socio-cultural inclusion of youth from disadvantaged backgrounds, are seen as relevant; yet, we can observe a somewhat fragile involvement of families and communities in practices aimed at promoting their youth’s educational success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
5
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
School Principal Leadership, Teachers’ Commitment and Morale in Remote Elementary Schools of Indonesia ABP y Competencias Investigativas en un Entorno Virtual: Resultados y Percepción del Estudiante Resources mobilisation challenges in rural schools of South Africa: What can we learn? Dialogic teaching beyond words Desigualdad social y territorial de la educación en España
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1