从线性模型到非线性模型的建筑物预测控制

Matej Pčolka , Eva Žáčeková , Rush Robinett , Sergej Čelikovský , Michael Sebek
{"title":"从线性模型到非线性模型的建筑物预测控制","authors":"Matej Pčolka ,&nbsp;Eva Žáčeková ,&nbsp;Rush Robinett ,&nbsp;Sergej Čelikovský ,&nbsp;Michael Sebek","doi":"10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.02783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the building climate control area, the linear model predictive control (LMPC)—nowadays considered a mature technique—benefits from the fact that the resulting optimization task is convex (thus easily and quickly solvable). On the other hand, while nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) using a more detailed nonlinear model of a building takes advantage of its more accurate predictions and the fact that it attacks the optimization task more directly, it requires more involved ways of solving the non-convex optimization problem. In this paper, the gap between LMPC and NMPC is bridged by introducing several variants of linear time-varying model predictive controller (LTVMPC). Making use of linear time-varying model of the controlled building, LTVMPC obtains predictions which are closer to reality than those of linear time invariant model while still keeping the optimization task convex and less computationally demanding than in the case of NMPC. The concept of LTVMPC is verified on a set of numerical experiments performed using a high fidelity model created in a building simulation environment and compared to the previously mentioned alternatives (LMPC and NMPC) looking at both the control performance and the computational requirements.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13260,"journal":{"name":"IFAC Proceedings Volumes","volume":"47 3","pages":"Pages 587-592"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.02783","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Linear to Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of a Building\",\"authors\":\"Matej Pčolka ,&nbsp;Eva Žáčeková ,&nbsp;Rush Robinett ,&nbsp;Sergej Čelikovský ,&nbsp;Michael Sebek\",\"doi\":\"10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.02783\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the building climate control area, the linear model predictive control (LMPC)—nowadays considered a mature technique—benefits from the fact that the resulting optimization task is convex (thus easily and quickly solvable). On the other hand, while nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) using a more detailed nonlinear model of a building takes advantage of its more accurate predictions and the fact that it attacks the optimization task more directly, it requires more involved ways of solving the non-convex optimization problem. In this paper, the gap between LMPC and NMPC is bridged by introducing several variants of linear time-varying model predictive controller (LTVMPC). Making use of linear time-varying model of the controlled building, LTVMPC obtains predictions which are closer to reality than those of linear time invariant model while still keeping the optimization task convex and less computationally demanding than in the case of NMPC. The concept of LTVMPC is verified on a set of numerical experiments performed using a high fidelity model created in a building simulation environment and compared to the previously mentioned alternatives (LMPC and NMPC) looking at both the control performance and the computational requirements.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IFAC Proceedings Volumes\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 587-592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3182/20140824-6-ZA-1003.02783\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IFAC Proceedings Volumes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474667016416782\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IFAC Proceedings Volumes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474667016416782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要:在建筑气候控制领域,线性模型预测控制(LMPC)是一种成熟的技术,其优化任务是凸的(因此易于快速求解)。另一方面,虽然非线性模型预测控制(NMPC)使用更详细的建筑物非线性模型,利用其更准确的预测和更直接地攻击优化任务的事实,但它需要更复杂的方法来解决非凸优化问题。本文通过引入线性时变模型预测控制器(LTVMPC)的几个变体,弥补了LMPC和NMPC之间的差距。LTVMPC利用被控建筑的线性时变模型,在保证优化任务的凸性和减少计算量的前提下,获得了比线性时不变模型更接近实际的预测结果。LTVMPC的概念通过在建筑仿真环境中创建的高保真模型进行的一组数值实验进行了验证,并与前面提到的替代方案(LMPC和NMPC)进行了比较,同时考虑了控制性能和计算需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Linear to Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of a Building

In the building climate control area, the linear model predictive control (LMPC)—nowadays considered a mature technique—benefits from the fact that the resulting optimization task is convex (thus easily and quickly solvable). On the other hand, while nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) using a more detailed nonlinear model of a building takes advantage of its more accurate predictions and the fact that it attacks the optimization task more directly, it requires more involved ways of solving the non-convex optimization problem. In this paper, the gap between LMPC and NMPC is bridged by introducing several variants of linear time-varying model predictive controller (LTVMPC). Making use of linear time-varying model of the controlled building, LTVMPC obtains predictions which are closer to reality than those of linear time invariant model while still keeping the optimization task convex and less computationally demanding than in the case of NMPC. The concept of LTVMPC is verified on a set of numerical experiments performed using a high fidelity model created in a building simulation environment and compared to the previously mentioned alternatives (LMPC and NMPC) looking at both the control performance and the computational requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Control of a Vibrating Axisymmetric Membrane using Piezoelectric Transducers An expert system for freshwater fish-farming industry Platelet count control in immune thrombocytopenic purpura patient: optimum romiplostim dose profile A Hybrid Model of the Akamai Adaptive Streaming Control System Control of an Industrial Scale Bioreactor using a PAT Analyser
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1