{"title":"为不可辩护辩护:乔安娜·霍伊特和法官的忏悔","authors":"Serge Frolov, Mikhail S. Stetckevich","doi":"10.1353/hbr.2021.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Responding to JoAnna Hoyt's article in the 2020 volume of Hebrew Studies, as well as to her earlier publication, we discuss her insistence that Israel's repentance plays no role in the book of Judges as an example of theologically driven eisegesis, sustainable only by cherry-picking of evidence and faulty philology and leading to absurdity and self-contradiction on multiple counts.","PeriodicalId":35110,"journal":{"name":"Hebrew Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"73 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defending the Indefensible: Joanna Hoyt and Repentance in Judges\",\"authors\":\"Serge Frolov, Mikhail S. Stetckevich\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hbr.2021.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Responding to JoAnna Hoyt's article in the 2020 volume of Hebrew Studies, as well as to her earlier publication, we discuss her insistence that Israel's repentance plays no role in the book of Judges as an example of theologically driven eisegesis, sustainable only by cherry-picking of evidence and faulty philology and leading to absurdity and self-contradiction on multiple counts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hebrew Studies\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"73 - 93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hebrew Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2021.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hebrew Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2021.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Defending the Indefensible: Joanna Hoyt and Repentance in Judges
Abstract:Responding to JoAnna Hoyt's article in the 2020 volume of Hebrew Studies, as well as to her earlier publication, we discuss her insistence that Israel's repentance plays no role in the book of Judges as an example of theologically driven eisegesis, sustainable only by cherry-picking of evidence and faulty philology and leading to absurdity and self-contradiction on multiple counts.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
