冠状病毒时期的银行危机管理和国家援助

Concetta Brescia Morra
{"title":"冠状病毒时期的银行危机管理和国家援助","authors":"Concetta Brescia Morra","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3775539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The directives and regulations on banking crisis management approved in the years 2013-2014 established inflexible limits on the use of public financial resources. This political choice of the European legislature could cause administrative authorities to find themselves with their hands tied in case the COVID-19 pandemic will give rise to failures of banking intermediaries, jeopardizing the overall stability of the financial system. Such a stance is not consistent with the Treaty approach on State aid that confers large discretion to the European Commission to adapt the rules to different economic scenarios. The criticism does not dispute the principle that public financial support must be the last resort to be activated and that its use must be limited to the minimum. The paper suggests that wide discretion on the part of the administrative authorities is necessary especially in the case of a pandemic-derived crisis, which is very difficult to predict and which dramatically changes the economic scenarios. Moreover, a pandemic causing negative consequences on all economic systems, even if it could have different effects in each Member State, requires collective action. Therefore, the choices on how to react to the crisis, including the case of a banking crisis, must be decided at the European level.","PeriodicalId":20373,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy - Development: Health eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Banking Crises and State Aid in Times of Coronavirus\",\"authors\":\"Concetta Brescia Morra\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3775539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The directives and regulations on banking crisis management approved in the years 2013-2014 established inflexible limits on the use of public financial resources. This political choice of the European legislature could cause administrative authorities to find themselves with their hands tied in case the COVID-19 pandemic will give rise to failures of banking intermediaries, jeopardizing the overall stability of the financial system. Such a stance is not consistent with the Treaty approach on State aid that confers large discretion to the European Commission to adapt the rules to different economic scenarios. The criticism does not dispute the principle that public financial support must be the last resort to be activated and that its use must be limited to the minimum. The paper suggests that wide discretion on the part of the administrative authorities is necessary especially in the case of a pandemic-derived crisis, which is very difficult to predict and which dramatically changes the economic scenarios. Moreover, a pandemic causing negative consequences on all economic systems, even if it could have different effects in each Member State, requires collective action. Therefore, the choices on how to react to the crisis, including the case of a banking crisis, must be decided at the European level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Economy - Development: Health eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Economy - Development: Health eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3775539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy - Development: Health eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3775539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2013-2014年批准的银行危机管理指令和法规对公共金融资源的使用设置了不灵活的限制。欧洲议会的这种政治选择,可能会导致行政当局束手无策,以防新冠疫情导致银行中介机构倒闭,危及金融体系的整体稳定。这种立场不符合《条约》关于国家援助的做法,因为《条约》给予欧洲委员会很大的自由裁量权,使其能够使规则适应不同的经济情况。批评并没有质疑公共财政支持必须是最后的手段,其使用必须限制在最低限度的原则。该文件表明,行政当局有必要保持广泛的自由裁量权,特别是在发生由流行病引起的危机的情况下,这种危机很难预测,而且会极大地改变经济情景。此外,对所有经济制度造成负面影响的流行病,即使对每个会员国的影响不同,也需要采取集体行动。因此,关于如何应对危机(包括银行业危机)的选择,必须在欧洲层面上做出决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management of Banking Crises and State Aid in Times of Coronavirus
The directives and regulations on banking crisis management approved in the years 2013-2014 established inflexible limits on the use of public financial resources. This political choice of the European legislature could cause administrative authorities to find themselves with their hands tied in case the COVID-19 pandemic will give rise to failures of banking intermediaries, jeopardizing the overall stability of the financial system. Such a stance is not consistent with the Treaty approach on State aid that confers large discretion to the European Commission to adapt the rules to different economic scenarios. The criticism does not dispute the principle that public financial support must be the last resort to be activated and that its use must be limited to the minimum. The paper suggests that wide discretion on the part of the administrative authorities is necessary especially in the case of a pandemic-derived crisis, which is very difficult to predict and which dramatically changes the economic scenarios. Moreover, a pandemic causing negative consequences on all economic systems, even if it could have different effects in each Member State, requires collective action. Therefore, the choices on how to react to the crisis, including the case of a banking crisis, must be decided at the European level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Legacy of COVID-19 in Education The Gender Effects of COVID-19 on Equity Analysts Impacts of the COVID Lockdown on Consumption: Household Data from India Status Externalities in Education and Low Birth Rates in Korea Did Precious Metals Serve as Hedge and Safe-Haven Alternatives to Equity during the COVID-19 Pandemic: New Insights Using a Copula-Based Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1