通过自然培养再生产教育精英。教育育儿实践作为文化差异策略的定性分析

Tim Sawert
{"title":"通过自然培养再生产教育精英。教育育儿实践作为文化差异策略的定性分析","authors":"Tim Sawert","doi":"10.5771/0038-6073-2021-1-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the last decades, the socially inclusive educational expansion diluted the previous exclusiveness of upper secondary degrees. Unlike the UK, the USA, or France, no explicit “elite” institutions do exist in the German educational system. Nevertheless, educational inequality is no less pronounced. Hence, what child-rearing practices do educationally privileged families in Germany apply to intergenerationally transfer their social privilege in times of educational expansion? The article focusses on one such practice: the acquisition of humanist knowledge by learning Latin and Ancient Greek as a strategy of cultural distinction. To analyse educational strategies and whether people draw lines of distinction along knowledge in Latin and Ancient Greek, I conducted semi-structured interviews with parents of adolescents who had chosen different foreign language profiles. I show how the acquisition of this specific symbolic capital is embedded in a child-rearing practice aimed at obtaining horizontal educational distinction for a privileged academic class. Additionally, I show that the highly privileged status of particularly established academic families results in a child-rearing practice that I call natural cultivation, a more invisible strategy of distinctive child-rearing that appears almost passive compared to those already discussed more widely (e.g. Lareau 2003).","PeriodicalId":45144,"journal":{"name":"Soziale Welt-Zeitschrift Fur Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis","volume":"37 1","pages":"55-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The reproduction of educational elites through natural cultivation. A qualitative analysis of educational child-rearing practices as strategies of cultural distinction\",\"authors\":\"Tim Sawert\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/0038-6073-2021-1-55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the last decades, the socially inclusive educational expansion diluted the previous exclusiveness of upper secondary degrees. Unlike the UK, the USA, or France, no explicit “elite” institutions do exist in the German educational system. Nevertheless, educational inequality is no less pronounced. Hence, what child-rearing practices do educationally privileged families in Germany apply to intergenerationally transfer their social privilege in times of educational expansion? The article focusses on one such practice: the acquisition of humanist knowledge by learning Latin and Ancient Greek as a strategy of cultural distinction. To analyse educational strategies and whether people draw lines of distinction along knowledge in Latin and Ancient Greek, I conducted semi-structured interviews with parents of adolescents who had chosen different foreign language profiles. I show how the acquisition of this specific symbolic capital is embedded in a child-rearing practice aimed at obtaining horizontal educational distinction for a privileged academic class. Additionally, I show that the highly privileged status of particularly established academic families results in a child-rearing practice that I call natural cultivation, a more invisible strategy of distinctive child-rearing that appears almost passive compared to those already discussed more widely (e.g. Lareau 2003).\",\"PeriodicalId\":45144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soziale Welt-Zeitschrift Fur Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"55-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soziale Welt-Zeitschrift Fur Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2021-1-55\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soziale Welt-Zeitschrift Fur Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2021-1-55","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在过去的几十年里,社会包容性的教育扩张冲淡了以前高中学位的排他性。与英国、美国或法国不同,德国的教育体系中不存在明确的“精英”机构。然而,教育不平等也同样明显。那么,在教育扩张的时代,德国的教育特权家庭在代际间传递社会特权时采用了什么样的育儿方式呢?本文的重点是这样一种实践:通过学习拉丁语和古希腊语来获取人文主义知识,作为一种文化差异策略。为了分析教育策略,以及人们是否会根据拉丁语和古希腊语的知识划分界限,我对选择不同外语背景的青少年的父母进行了半结构化访谈。我展示了这种特殊的象征性资本的获得是如何嵌入到旨在为特权学术阶层获得横向教育区别的育儿实践中的。此外,我还表明,学术家庭的高度特权地位导致了一种我称之为自然培养的育儿实践,这是一种更无形的独特育儿策略,与那些已经被广泛讨论的策略相比,它几乎是被动的(例如Lareau 2003)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The reproduction of educational elites through natural cultivation. A qualitative analysis of educational child-rearing practices as strategies of cultural distinction
During the last decades, the socially inclusive educational expansion diluted the previous exclusiveness of upper secondary degrees. Unlike the UK, the USA, or France, no explicit “elite” institutions do exist in the German educational system. Nevertheless, educational inequality is no less pronounced. Hence, what child-rearing practices do educationally privileged families in Germany apply to intergenerationally transfer their social privilege in times of educational expansion? The article focusses on one such practice: the acquisition of humanist knowledge by learning Latin and Ancient Greek as a strategy of cultural distinction. To analyse educational strategies and whether people draw lines of distinction along knowledge in Latin and Ancient Greek, I conducted semi-structured interviews with parents of adolescents who had chosen different foreign language profiles. I show how the acquisition of this specific symbolic capital is embedded in a child-rearing practice aimed at obtaining horizontal educational distinction for a privileged academic class. Additionally, I show that the highly privileged status of particularly established academic families results in a child-rearing practice that I call natural cultivation, a more invisible strategy of distinctive child-rearing that appears almost passive compared to those already discussed more widely (e.g. Lareau 2003).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Soziale Welt is one of the important journals within German sociology and is even read in foreign countries. It includes empirical and theoretical contributions from all areas of the subject and tries to portray the development of sociology and to give a new impetus. In addition to the quarterly published issues, there are special issues with a unified theme. The journal "Soziale Welt" is aimed at sociologists, social scientists, and at generally interested readers
期刊最新文献
Social Origin and Students’ Trajectory Patterns at German Universities. A Sequence-Analytical Approach (K)ein Platz für die Kunst und Kultur ethnischer Minderheiten? Zur Unterstützung der öffentlichen Förderung der Kunst und Kultur ethnischer Minderheiten in der deutschen Bevölkerung Zwischen Kontingenz und Curricula. Bewertungsprozesse in der universitären Lehre Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis Homeoffice und suchthaftes Arbeiten in Deutschland. Sind Homeofficeintensität und betriebliche Regulierung von Bedeutung?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1