巴基斯坦建筑法定裁决的可能性:从联合王国的制度中得出结论

Nouman Qadir, Tara Brooks, Edward Quigg
{"title":"巴基斯坦建筑法定裁决的可能性:从联合王国的制度中得出结论","authors":"Nouman Qadir, Tara Brooks, Edward Quigg","doi":"10.1680/jmapl.23.00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examines the United Kingdom’s statutory adjudication process to identify possible benefits of the introduction of a similar system in Pakistan with the assumption of having full support of all three wings of the Pakistani government for the resulting legislative reforms. The study of potential hurdles in detail was outside the scope of this study. A literature review, summarised within the paper, was undertaken to identify factors contributing to conflicts in Pakistan’s construction sector, and the reasons behind inefficiency of the present dispute resolution methods. Data was collected using nine semi-structured interviews of industry professionals from (both) Pakistan and the United Kingdom. Each interview was analysed through cognitive Mapping, central and domain analysis using Banxia Decision Explorer software. Later, a questionnaire asked professionals working with contractors/subcontractors in Pakistan regarding the potential success of introduction of statutory adjudication in Pakistan. The preamble of the questionnaire defined the basics of statutory adjudication for the participants. The 70 valid responses received were then analysed through Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) software. This research has shown that payment issues are the biggest source of disputes in Pakistan’s construction sector. The financially weaker party is often subjugated to be deprived of its rights mostly due to the absence of an accessible justice system. The introduction of statutory adjudication could be beneficial for Pakistan’s construction sector as it will provide an accessible, cost efficient, and swift method of dispute resolution.","PeriodicalId":44163,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management Procurement and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The potential for construction statutory adjudication in Pakistan: drawing conclusions from the United Kingdom’s system\",\"authors\":\"Nouman Qadir, Tara Brooks, Edward Quigg\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jmapl.23.00008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study examines the United Kingdom’s statutory adjudication process to identify possible benefits of the introduction of a similar system in Pakistan with the assumption of having full support of all three wings of the Pakistani government for the resulting legislative reforms. The study of potential hurdles in detail was outside the scope of this study. A literature review, summarised within the paper, was undertaken to identify factors contributing to conflicts in Pakistan’s construction sector, and the reasons behind inefficiency of the present dispute resolution methods. Data was collected using nine semi-structured interviews of industry professionals from (both) Pakistan and the United Kingdom. Each interview was analysed through cognitive Mapping, central and domain analysis using Banxia Decision Explorer software. Later, a questionnaire asked professionals working with contractors/subcontractors in Pakistan regarding the potential success of introduction of statutory adjudication in Pakistan. The preamble of the questionnaire defined the basics of statutory adjudication for the participants. The 70 valid responses received were then analysed through Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) software. This research has shown that payment issues are the biggest source of disputes in Pakistan’s construction sector. The financially weaker party is often subjugated to be deprived of its rights mostly due to the absence of an accessible justice system. The introduction of statutory adjudication could be beneficial for Pakistan’s construction sector as it will provide an accessible, cost efficient, and swift method of dispute resolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management Procurement and Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management Procurement and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.23.00008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Management Procurement and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jmapl.23.00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究审查了联合王国的法定裁决程序,以确定在巴基斯坦采用类似制度可能带来的好处,假设巴基斯坦政府的所有三个派别都对由此产生的立法改革给予全力支持。对潜在障碍的详细研究超出了本研究的范围。本文对文献进行了综述,以确定导致巴基斯坦建筑部门冲突的因素,以及目前解决争端方法效率低下背后的原因。数据是通过对来自巴基斯坦和英国的行业专业人士的九次半结构化访谈收集的。利用半夏决策探索者软件对每次访谈进行认知映射、中心分析和领域分析。后来,一份调查问卷询问了在巴基斯坦与承包商/分包商合作的专业人员关于在巴基斯坦引入法定裁决的潜在成功。问卷的序言部分为参与者界定了法定裁决的基本原则。然后通过社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)软件对收到的70份有效答复进行分析。这项研究表明,付款问题是巴基斯坦建筑业纠纷的最大来源。经济实力较弱的一方往往屈服于被剥夺其权利,这主要是由于缺乏可访问的司法系统。引入法定裁决可能有利于巴基斯坦的建筑部门,因为它将提供一种易于获取、具有成本效益和迅速解决争端的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The potential for construction statutory adjudication in Pakistan: drawing conclusions from the United Kingdom’s system
The study examines the United Kingdom’s statutory adjudication process to identify possible benefits of the introduction of a similar system in Pakistan with the assumption of having full support of all three wings of the Pakistani government for the resulting legislative reforms. The study of potential hurdles in detail was outside the scope of this study. A literature review, summarised within the paper, was undertaken to identify factors contributing to conflicts in Pakistan’s construction sector, and the reasons behind inefficiency of the present dispute resolution methods. Data was collected using nine semi-structured interviews of industry professionals from (both) Pakistan and the United Kingdom. Each interview was analysed through cognitive Mapping, central and domain analysis using Banxia Decision Explorer software. Later, a questionnaire asked professionals working with contractors/subcontractors in Pakistan regarding the potential success of introduction of statutory adjudication in Pakistan. The preamble of the questionnaire defined the basics of statutory adjudication for the participants. The 70 valid responses received were then analysed through Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) software. This research has shown that payment issues are the biggest source of disputes in Pakistan’s construction sector. The financially weaker party is often subjugated to be deprived of its rights mostly due to the absence of an accessible justice system. The introduction of statutory adjudication could be beneficial for Pakistan’s construction sector as it will provide an accessible, cost efficient, and swift method of dispute resolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Construction Industry, An Evaluation of UK Research and Practice – by Andrew Agapiou Construction Law Quarterly The potential for construction statutory adjudication in Pakistan: drawing conclusions from the United Kingdom’s system Application of multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods for construction safety research Construction Law Quarterly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1