{"title":"1968年——叛逆一年的共鸣记忆","authors":"Donatella della Porta","doi":"10.3167/cont.2018.060202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The year 1968 has been considered a historical moment\nin the study of protest. What is celebrated on its fiftieth anniversary,\nas for any historical event, is a particularly specific vision\nof that year. This article bridges social movement studies with\nmemory studies, arguing that social movement studies should give\nmore attention to how movement events are remembered by subsequent\nmovements. I argue that the memory of 1968 has proven to\nbe selective, contested, and changeable over time. I suggest that, as\nmemories of democratic transitions intertwined with anti-austerity\nprotests, the memories of 1968’s rebellious year acquire a central\nrelevance in times of quick transformation, in which old identities\nand relations are unsettled and new ones emerge. I explore\nthis through a discussion of current debates on memory distortion,\ncontestation, and fluidity.","PeriodicalId":36466,"journal":{"name":"Contention","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1968 – The Resonant Memory of a Rebellious Year\",\"authors\":\"Donatella della Porta\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/cont.2018.060202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The year 1968 has been considered a historical moment\\nin the study of protest. What is celebrated on its fiftieth anniversary,\\nas for any historical event, is a particularly specific vision\\nof that year. This article bridges social movement studies with\\nmemory studies, arguing that social movement studies should give\\nmore attention to how movement events are remembered by subsequent\\nmovements. I argue that the memory of 1968 has proven to\\nbe selective, contested, and changeable over time. I suggest that, as\\nmemories of democratic transitions intertwined with anti-austerity\\nprotests, the memories of 1968’s rebellious year acquire a central\\nrelevance in times of quick transformation, in which old identities\\nand relations are unsettled and new ones emerge. I explore\\nthis through a discussion of current debates on memory distortion,\\ncontestation, and fluidity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contention\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/cont.2018.060202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/cont.2018.060202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
The year 1968 has been considered a historical moment
in the study of protest. What is celebrated on its fiftieth anniversary,
as for any historical event, is a particularly specific vision
of that year. This article bridges social movement studies with
memory studies, arguing that social movement studies should give
more attention to how movement events are remembered by subsequent
movements. I argue that the memory of 1968 has proven to
be selective, contested, and changeable over time. I suggest that, as
memories of democratic transitions intertwined with anti-austerity
protests, the memories of 1968’s rebellious year acquire a central
relevance in times of quick transformation, in which old identities
and relations are unsettled and new ones emerge. I explore
this through a discussion of current debates on memory distortion,
contestation, and fluidity.