R. Hamerly, T. Inagaki, P. McMahon, D. Venturelli, A. Marandi, Tatsuhiro Onodera, Edwin Ng, E. Rieffel, M. Fejer, S. Utsunomiya, H. Takesue, Y. Yamamoto
{"title":"量子与光学退火:OPO Ising Machine和D-Wave的基准测试","authors":"R. Hamerly, T. Inagaki, P. McMahon, D. Venturelli, A. Marandi, Tatsuhiro Onodera, Edwin Ng, E. Rieffel, M. Fejer, S. Utsunomiya, H. Takesue, Y. Yamamoto","doi":"10.1364/CLEO_QELS.2018.FTU4A.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We benchmark the OPO-based Coherent Ising Machine (CIM) against the D-Wave quantum annealer for Ising problems up to size N = 200. The CIM exhibits exponential speedup relative to D-Wave for Ising problems with dense connectivity.","PeriodicalId":6498,"journal":{"name":"2018 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO)","volume":"23 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantum vs. Optical Annealing: Benchmarking the OPO Ising Machine and D-Wave\",\"authors\":\"R. Hamerly, T. Inagaki, P. McMahon, D. Venturelli, A. Marandi, Tatsuhiro Onodera, Edwin Ng, E. Rieffel, M. Fejer, S. Utsunomiya, H. Takesue, Y. Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1364/CLEO_QELS.2018.FTU4A.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We benchmark the OPO-based Coherent Ising Machine (CIM) against the D-Wave quantum annealer for Ising problems up to size N = 200. The CIM exhibits exponential speedup relative to D-Wave for Ising problems with dense connectivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"1-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1364/CLEO_QELS.2018.FTU4A.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/CLEO_QELS.2018.FTU4A.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantum vs. Optical Annealing: Benchmarking the OPO Ising Machine and D-Wave
We benchmark the OPO-based Coherent Ising Machine (CIM) against the D-Wave quantum annealer for Ising problems up to size N = 200. The CIM exhibits exponential speedup relative to D-Wave for Ising problems with dense connectivity.