{"title":"芬太尼与非诺酚在选择性剖宫产蛛网膜下腔麻醉中的镇静效果比较","authors":"Md Enayet Karim, Mohammad Saleh Akram, RAM Mustafijur Rashid, Reza Ershad, Md Muzibur Rahman","doi":"10.3329/kyamcj.v13i4.40949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Regional anaesthesia has become an important anaesthetic technique now a days. Pharmacologically induced tranquility improves acceptance of regional technique. Objective: To compare Fentanyl and Fenofol (Fentanyl+Propofol) in terms of onset and recovery of sedation, haemodynamic effects, respiratory effects and adverse effects of both the drugs during elective Caesarian section under spinal(subarachnoid) anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 60 ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) grade I or II patients between age 20-40 years undergoing elective Caesarean sections under Subarachnoid anaesthesia during the period January 2022 to June 2022. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups: Fentanyl group (Group F, n=30), who received Fentanyl in a single dose of 0.5mcg/kg and Fenofol group (Group FP, n=30), who received Fenofol in a single dose of Fentanyl-0.5mcg/kg+Propofol-0.5mg/kg. Spinal anaesthesia was conducted by injecting a hyperbaric solution of 0.5% bupivacaine 3ml through a 25G spinal needle at L3-4 level. All parameters were documented at 5 min intervals until arousal of the patient. The onset of sedation i.e. time from iv (intravenous) injection of Fentanyl or Fenofol to closure of eye lids (OAA/S score of 3) and the arousal time from sedation i.e. time from closing of the eye lids to OAA/S score of 5 ( patient is awake clinically) were noted. Any complication during operation was documented. The patient’s satisfaction with the sedation was assessed by the 5 point ‘Likert verbal rating scale.’ Results: There was no significant difference of mean blood pressure and mean heart rate between the two groups in different time intervals (P>0.05). Time of onset of sedation and the arousal time i.e. duration of sedation was comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). Significant percentage of patients required O2 supplementation in Fenofol group due to hypoventilation (66.66% vs 10%, P<0.001). Pain in arm during drug administration was significantly more with Fenofol (46.66% vs 6.66%, P<0.001). Conclusion: As a significantly higher percentage of patients required O2 supplementation during sedation with Fenofol and pain in arm during drug administration was significantly more in Fenofol group, it is recommended that Fentanyl is a better choice than Fenofol for sedation in single dose technique during subarachnoid block for Caesarean section.\nKYAMC Journal Vol. 13, No. 04, January 2023: 234-239","PeriodicalId":17948,"journal":{"name":"KYAMC Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Effects of Fentanyl and Fenofol as Sedative in Elective Caesarean Section under Subarachnoid Anaesthesia\",\"authors\":\"Md Enayet Karim, Mohammad Saleh Akram, RAM Mustafijur Rashid, Reza Ershad, Md Muzibur Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/kyamcj.v13i4.40949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Regional anaesthesia has become an important anaesthetic technique now a days. Pharmacologically induced tranquility improves acceptance of regional technique. Objective: To compare Fentanyl and Fenofol (Fentanyl+Propofol) in terms of onset and recovery of sedation, haemodynamic effects, respiratory effects and adverse effects of both the drugs during elective Caesarian section under spinal(subarachnoid) anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 60 ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) grade I or II patients between age 20-40 years undergoing elective Caesarean sections under Subarachnoid anaesthesia during the period January 2022 to June 2022. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups: Fentanyl group (Group F, n=30), who received Fentanyl in a single dose of 0.5mcg/kg and Fenofol group (Group FP, n=30), who received Fenofol in a single dose of Fentanyl-0.5mcg/kg+Propofol-0.5mg/kg. Spinal anaesthesia was conducted by injecting a hyperbaric solution of 0.5% bupivacaine 3ml through a 25G spinal needle at L3-4 level. All parameters were documented at 5 min intervals until arousal of the patient. The onset of sedation i.e. time from iv (intravenous) injection of Fentanyl or Fenofol to closure of eye lids (OAA/S score of 3) and the arousal time from sedation i.e. time from closing of the eye lids to OAA/S score of 5 ( patient is awake clinically) were noted. Any complication during operation was documented. The patient’s satisfaction with the sedation was assessed by the 5 point ‘Likert verbal rating scale.’ Results: There was no significant difference of mean blood pressure and mean heart rate between the two groups in different time intervals (P>0.05). Time of onset of sedation and the arousal time i.e. duration of sedation was comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). Significant percentage of patients required O2 supplementation in Fenofol group due to hypoventilation (66.66% vs 10%, P<0.001). Pain in arm during drug administration was significantly more with Fenofol (46.66% vs 6.66%, P<0.001). Conclusion: As a significantly higher percentage of patients required O2 supplementation during sedation with Fenofol and pain in arm during drug administration was significantly more in Fenofol group, it is recommended that Fentanyl is a better choice than Fenofol for sedation in single dose technique during subarachnoid block for Caesarean section.\\nKYAMC Journal Vol. 13, No. 04, January 2023: 234-239\",\"PeriodicalId\":17948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KYAMC Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KYAMC Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/kyamcj.v13i4.40949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KYAMC Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/kyamcj.v13i4.40949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:区域麻醉已成为一种重要的麻醉技术。药理学诱导的平静提高了局部技术的接受度。目的:比较芬太尼与非诺酚(芬太尼+异丙酚)在脊髓(蛛网膜下腔)麻醉下择期剖宫产时镇静起效、恢复、血流动力学作用、呼吸作用及不良反应。材料和方法:该随机临床试验包括60例年龄在20-40岁之间的ASA(美国麻醉师学会)I级或II级患者,于2022年1月至2022年6月期间在蛛网膜下腔麻醉下进行选择性剖腹产。患者随机分为两组:芬太尼组(F组,n=30),芬太尼单次剂量0.5mcg/kg;非诺酚组(FP组,n=30),非诺酚单次剂量芬太尼-0.5mcg/kg+异丙酚-0.5mg/kg。脊髓麻醉通过25G脊髓针在L3-4水平注射0.5%布比卡因3ml高压溶液。每隔5分钟记录一次所有参数,直到患者醒来。记录镇静的起效时间,即从静脉注射芬太尼或非诺酚到闭上眼睑(OAA/S评分为3)的时间,以及镇静的唤醒时间,即从闭上眼睑到OAA/S评分为5(患者临床清醒)的时间。记录手术过程中任何并发症。采用李克特5分口头评定量表评估患者对镇静的满意度。结果:两组患者在不同时间间隔的平均血压、平均心率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者镇静起效时间和唤醒时间(即镇静持续时间)具有可比性(P < 0.05)。非诺福尔组患者因低通气需要补充氧气的比例显著(66.66% vs 10%, P<0.001)。非诺酚组给药期间手臂疼痛明显加重(46.66% vs 6.66%, P<0.001)。结论:剖宫产术中蛛网膜下腔阻滞单剂量镇静时,芬太尼比非诺酚更适合于芬太尼,且非诺酚组在镇静过程中需要补充氧气的比例明显高于非诺酚组,给药过程中手臂疼痛明显高于非诺酚组。KYAMC学报,Vol. 13, No. 04, 2023年1月:234-239
Comparison between Effects of Fentanyl and Fenofol as Sedative in Elective Caesarean Section under Subarachnoid Anaesthesia
Background: Regional anaesthesia has become an important anaesthetic technique now a days. Pharmacologically induced tranquility improves acceptance of regional technique. Objective: To compare Fentanyl and Fenofol (Fentanyl+Propofol) in terms of onset and recovery of sedation, haemodynamic effects, respiratory effects and adverse effects of both the drugs during elective Caesarian section under spinal(subarachnoid) anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: This randomized clinical trial included 60 ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) grade I or II patients between age 20-40 years undergoing elective Caesarean sections under Subarachnoid anaesthesia during the period January 2022 to June 2022. Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups: Fentanyl group (Group F, n=30), who received Fentanyl in a single dose of 0.5mcg/kg and Fenofol group (Group FP, n=30), who received Fenofol in a single dose of Fentanyl-0.5mcg/kg+Propofol-0.5mg/kg. Spinal anaesthesia was conducted by injecting a hyperbaric solution of 0.5% bupivacaine 3ml through a 25G spinal needle at L3-4 level. All parameters were documented at 5 min intervals until arousal of the patient. The onset of sedation i.e. time from iv (intravenous) injection of Fentanyl or Fenofol to closure of eye lids (OAA/S score of 3) and the arousal time from sedation i.e. time from closing of the eye lids to OAA/S score of 5 ( patient is awake clinically) were noted. Any complication during operation was documented. The patient’s satisfaction with the sedation was assessed by the 5 point ‘Likert verbal rating scale.’ Results: There was no significant difference of mean blood pressure and mean heart rate between the two groups in different time intervals (P>0.05). Time of onset of sedation and the arousal time i.e. duration of sedation was comparable between the two groups (P>0.05). Significant percentage of patients required O2 supplementation in Fenofol group due to hypoventilation (66.66% vs 10%, P<0.001). Pain in arm during drug administration was significantly more with Fenofol (46.66% vs 6.66%, P<0.001). Conclusion: As a significantly higher percentage of patients required O2 supplementation during sedation with Fenofol and pain in arm during drug administration was significantly more in Fenofol group, it is recommended that Fentanyl is a better choice than Fenofol for sedation in single dose technique during subarachnoid block for Caesarean section.
KYAMC Journal Vol. 13, No. 04, January 2023: 234-239