中世纪反教权主义:条款和条件

IF 0.3 2区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY HISTORY OF RELIGIONS Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.1086/714917
R. Swanson
{"title":"中世纪反教权主义:条款和条件","authors":"R. Swanson","doi":"10.1086/714917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article grapples with the problem of applying a nineteenth-century neologism to the relationships between clergy and laity within pre-Reformation Catholicism, essentially between circa 1100 and circa 1530. Broad approaches to the history of “anticlericalism” identify a major shift in its character at the Reformation, without being specific about its nature. Historians employ “anticlericalism” as an analytical concept, but somewhat insecurely, referring sometimes to criticism of the behavior of individual clerics, sometimes to a more fundamental critique of church institutions and practices. While accepting that the vocabulary of “anticlericalism” is now too embedded in medievalist scholarship to be eliminated, the article argues for greater care and precision among medievalists in its use, especially if it is to be transposed from its Western origins to serve as an analytical concept for the “global middle ages.”","PeriodicalId":45784,"journal":{"name":"HISTORY OF RELIGIONS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medieval Anticlericalism: Terms and Conditions\",\"authors\":\"R. Swanson\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/714917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article grapples with the problem of applying a nineteenth-century neologism to the relationships between clergy and laity within pre-Reformation Catholicism, essentially between circa 1100 and circa 1530. Broad approaches to the history of “anticlericalism” identify a major shift in its character at the Reformation, without being specific about its nature. Historians employ “anticlericalism” as an analytical concept, but somewhat insecurely, referring sometimes to criticism of the behavior of individual clerics, sometimes to a more fundamental critique of church institutions and practices. While accepting that the vocabulary of “anticlericalism” is now too embedded in medievalist scholarship to be eliminated, the article argues for greater care and precision among medievalists in its use, especially if it is to be transposed from its Western origins to serve as an analytical concept for the “global middle ages.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":45784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HISTORY OF RELIGIONS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HISTORY OF RELIGIONS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/714917\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORY OF RELIGIONS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/714917","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章讨论的是如何将一个19世纪的新词应用到宗教改革前的天主教中神职人员和俗人之间的关系中,也就是1100年到1530年之间。对“反教权主义”历史的广泛研究表明,在宗教改革时期,“反教权主义”的特征发生了重大转变,但没有具体说明其本质。历史学家将“反教权主义”作为一个分析概念,但有些不可靠,有时指的是对神职人员个人行为的批评,有时指的是对教会制度和实践的更基本的批评。虽然承认“反教权主义”这一词汇在中世纪学术研究中已经根深蒂固,难以消除,但文章认为,中世纪学者在使用这一词汇时应更加谨慎和精确,特别是如果要将其从西方起源转变为“全球中世纪”的分析概念时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medieval Anticlericalism: Terms and Conditions
This article grapples with the problem of applying a nineteenth-century neologism to the relationships between clergy and laity within pre-Reformation Catholicism, essentially between circa 1100 and circa 1530. Broad approaches to the history of “anticlericalism” identify a major shift in its character at the Reformation, without being specific about its nature. Historians employ “anticlericalism” as an analytical concept, but somewhat insecurely, referring sometimes to criticism of the behavior of individual clerics, sometimes to a more fundamental critique of church institutions and practices. While accepting that the vocabulary of “anticlericalism” is now too embedded in medievalist scholarship to be eliminated, the article argues for greater care and precision among medievalists in its use, especially if it is to be transposed from its Western origins to serve as an analytical concept for the “global middle ages.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: For nearly fifty years, History of Religions has set the standard for the study of religious phenomena from prehistory to modern times. History of Religions strives to publish scholarship that reflects engagement with particular traditions, places, and times and yet also speaks to broader methodological and/or theoretical issues in the study of religion. Toward encouraging critical conversations in the field, HR also publishes review articles and comprehensive book reviews by distinguished authors.
期刊最新文献
:Kindred Spirits: Friendship and Resistance at the Edges of Modern Catholicism Comparing Faiths: The Making of Religious Dialogue between the Ottoman Empire and Early Modern Europe The Incas and the Enlightenment: Andean Idols and European Discourses on Religion, 1550–1900 :Buddhist Historiography in China Water, Identity, and Baptism in K’iche’an Maya Narratives from Colonial Highland Guatemala
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1