干针刺对上斜方肌肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者疼痛和肌肉厚度的影响

J. Sarrafzadeh, Saemeh Khani, K. Ezzati, I. Takamjani
{"title":"干针刺对上斜方肌肌筋膜疼痛综合征患者疼痛和肌肉厚度的影响","authors":"J. Sarrafzadeh, Saemeh Khani, K. Ezzati, I. Takamjani","doi":"10.4172/2167-0846.1000322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Dry needling is one of the main therapeutic approaches in patients with Myofascial pain syndrome. Few studies have been compared the superficial and deep dry needling methods in these patients. Objective: To evaluate the effects of superficial and deep dry needling on pain and muscle thickness in subjects with upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome. Design: A randomized quasi-experimental double-blinded trial. Methods: 50 subjects with upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome (age=26/08 ± 4/62, weight=63/88 ± 8/71 kg, height=167/7 ± 4/82 cm, pain duration=9/75 ± 7/05 m) randomly assigned to the superficial (n=25) and deep (n=25) dry needling groups. The pain and maximum thickness of upper trapezius muscle in rest, fair and normal contractions were measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) and an ultrasound device respectively before and after the intervention as well as 7 and 15 days follow-up. Results: The mixed-model ANOVAs revealed a significant group-by-time interaction (F=44.03, p<0.001) for pain and muscle thickness in rest (F=67.00, p<0.001), fair (F=108.73, p<0.001) and normal contraction (F=17.73, p<0.001). The main effects of group and time were statistically significant for pain, rest, fair and normal muscle thickness (p<0.001). There were not any significant differences in rest, fair and normal muscle thickness after intervention as well as 7 and 15 days follow-up. Conclusion: Both superficial and deep dry needling techniques induced significant short-term changes in the VAS. Muscle thickness in rest, fair and normal contractions did not show any significant changes between the groups.","PeriodicalId":16641,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain and Relief","volume":"13 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Superficial and Deep Dry Needling on Pain and Muscle Thickness in Subject with Upper Trapezius Muscle Myofascial Pain Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"J. Sarrafzadeh, Saemeh Khani, K. Ezzati, I. Takamjani\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2167-0846.1000322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Dry needling is one of the main therapeutic approaches in patients with Myofascial pain syndrome. Few studies have been compared the superficial and deep dry needling methods in these patients. Objective: To evaluate the effects of superficial and deep dry needling on pain and muscle thickness in subjects with upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome. Design: A randomized quasi-experimental double-blinded trial. Methods: 50 subjects with upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome (age=26/08 ± 4/62, weight=63/88 ± 8/71 kg, height=167/7 ± 4/82 cm, pain duration=9/75 ± 7/05 m) randomly assigned to the superficial (n=25) and deep (n=25) dry needling groups. The pain and maximum thickness of upper trapezius muscle in rest, fair and normal contractions were measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) and an ultrasound device respectively before and after the intervention as well as 7 and 15 days follow-up. Results: The mixed-model ANOVAs revealed a significant group-by-time interaction (F=44.03, p<0.001) for pain and muscle thickness in rest (F=67.00, p<0.001), fair (F=108.73, p<0.001) and normal contraction (F=17.73, p<0.001). The main effects of group and time were statistically significant for pain, rest, fair and normal muscle thickness (p<0.001). There were not any significant differences in rest, fair and normal muscle thickness after intervention as well as 7 and 15 days follow-up. Conclusion: Both superficial and deep dry needling techniques induced significant short-term changes in the VAS. Muscle thickness in rest, fair and normal contractions did not show any significant changes between the groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain and Relief\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain and Relief\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0846.1000322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain and Relief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0846.1000322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:干针是肌筋膜疼痛综合征的主要治疗方法之一。很少有研究比较干针刺法和干针刺法在这些患者中的应用。目的:探讨浅干针刺和深干针刺对斜方肌上筋膜疼痛综合征患者疼痛和肌肉厚度的影响。设计:随机准实验双盲试验。方法:50例患有上斜方肌筋膜疼痛综合征的患者(年龄=26/08±4/62,体重=63/88±8/71 kg,身高=167/7±4/82 cm,疼痛持续时间=9/75±7/05 m)随机分为干针浅部组(n=25)和深部组(n=25)。分别采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和超声仪测量干预前后及随访7 d和15 d时静息、公平和正常收缩时斜方肌上部疼痛和最大厚度。结果:混合模型方差分析显示,疼痛和休息时肌肉厚度(F=67.00, p<0.001)、公平(F=108.73, p<0.001)和正常收缩(F=17.73, p<0.001)存在显著的组-时间交互作用(F=44.03, p<0.001)。组和时间对疼痛、休息、公平和正常肌肉厚度的主要影响有统计学意义(p<0.001)。干预后的休息时间、正常肌肉厚度和正常肌肉厚度在7天和15天的随访中均无显著差异。结论:浅针和深针均可引起VAS的短期变化。静息期、正常收缩期和正常收缩期的肌肉厚度在各组间无明显变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Superficial and Deep Dry Needling on Pain and Muscle Thickness in Subject with Upper Trapezius Muscle Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Background: Dry needling is one of the main therapeutic approaches in patients with Myofascial pain syndrome. Few studies have been compared the superficial and deep dry needling methods in these patients. Objective: To evaluate the effects of superficial and deep dry needling on pain and muscle thickness in subjects with upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome. Design: A randomized quasi-experimental double-blinded trial. Methods: 50 subjects with upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome (age=26/08 ± 4/62, weight=63/88 ± 8/71 kg, height=167/7 ± 4/82 cm, pain duration=9/75 ± 7/05 m) randomly assigned to the superficial (n=25) and deep (n=25) dry needling groups. The pain and maximum thickness of upper trapezius muscle in rest, fair and normal contractions were measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) and an ultrasound device respectively before and after the intervention as well as 7 and 15 days follow-up. Results: The mixed-model ANOVAs revealed a significant group-by-time interaction (F=44.03, p<0.001) for pain and muscle thickness in rest (F=67.00, p<0.001), fair (F=108.73, p<0.001) and normal contraction (F=17.73, p<0.001). The main effects of group and time were statistically significant for pain, rest, fair and normal muscle thickness (p<0.001). There were not any significant differences in rest, fair and normal muscle thickness after intervention as well as 7 and 15 days follow-up. Conclusion: Both superficial and deep dry needling techniques induced significant short-term changes in the VAS. Muscle thickness in rest, fair and normal contractions did not show any significant changes between the groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Support of Acute Pain Therapy by Analgesia Nociception Index in Post Anesthesia Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Trial Neurogenic information in autoimmune diseases and chronic pain syndromes Predictive Validity of Lumbar X-ray Images and MRIs for Chronic Low Back Pain Subtypes Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Spontaneous Pain in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Dexketoprofen for Mild to Moderate Pain among Filipino Adults: A Post-marketing Surveillance Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1