中央政府地方投资基金作为波兰地方政府的庇护主义政治工具-奥波斯基省德裔少数民族的地位

IF 0.5 4区 管理学 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI:10.4335/20.4.1113-1142(2022)
Bartosz Czepil
{"title":"中央政府地方投资基金作为波兰地方政府的庇护主义政治工具-奥波斯基省德裔少数民族的地位","authors":"Bartosz Czepil","doi":"10.4335/20.4.1113-1142(2022)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the paper is to analyse the distribution of funds from the Central Government Fund for Local Investments (CGFLI) granted in the years 2020-2021 to the communes and districts of the Opolskie province in which the German minority (GM) rules in local governments. A hypothesis has been formulated that communes and districts governed by the GM are not treated as neutral communes in the same sense as non-partisan communes governed by local government officials who do not represent national political parties, and such communes and districts may thus face discrimination in the distribution of funds, similar to what has been established in the case of the opposition \"Senate Bloc\". The hypothesis has proven to be accurate. Compared to non-partisan local governments, GM local governments are less likely to be supported and receive less in relative terms under the two CGFLI competition tranches. GM local governments are also in a worse position than Senate bloc local governments.","PeriodicalId":51875,"journal":{"name":"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Central Government Fund for Local Investments as an Instrument of Clientelist Politics Towards the Local Government in Poland – The Position of the German Minority in the Opolskie Province\",\"authors\":\"Bartosz Czepil\",\"doi\":\"10.4335/20.4.1113-1142(2022)\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the paper is to analyse the distribution of funds from the Central Government Fund for Local Investments (CGFLI) granted in the years 2020-2021 to the communes and districts of the Opolskie province in which the German minority (GM) rules in local governments. A hypothesis has been formulated that communes and districts governed by the GM are not treated as neutral communes in the same sense as non-partisan communes governed by local government officials who do not represent national political parties, and such communes and districts may thus face discrimination in the distribution of funds, similar to what has been established in the case of the opposition \\\"Senate Bloc\\\". The hypothesis has proven to be accurate. Compared to non-partisan local governments, GM local governments are less likely to be supported and receive less in relative terms under the two CGFLI competition tranches. GM local governments are also in a worse position than Senate bloc local governments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4335/20.4.1113-1142(2022)\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4335/20.4.1113-1142(2022)","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是分析2020-2021年中央政府地方投资基金(CGFLI)向德国少数民族(GM)在地方政府中统治的奥波尔斯基省公社和地区拨款的分配情况。有人提出了一种假设,即由GM管理的社区和地区不像由不代表国家政党的地方政府官员管理的无党派社区那样被视为中立的社区,因此,这些社区和地区可能在资金分配方面面临歧视,类似于反对派“参议院集团”的情况。这个假设已被证明是准确的。与无党派地方政府相比,通用汽车地方政府在CGFLI的两个竞争等级下获得支持的可能性更小,相对而言获得的支持也更少。通用汽车的地方政府也比参议院集团的地方政府处境更糟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Central Government Fund for Local Investments as an Instrument of Clientelist Politics Towards the Local Government in Poland – The Position of the German Minority in the Opolskie Province
The objective of the paper is to analyse the distribution of funds from the Central Government Fund for Local Investments (CGFLI) granted in the years 2020-2021 to the communes and districts of the Opolskie province in which the German minority (GM) rules in local governments. A hypothesis has been formulated that communes and districts governed by the GM are not treated as neutral communes in the same sense as non-partisan communes governed by local government officials who do not represent national political parties, and such communes and districts may thus face discrimination in the distribution of funds, similar to what has been established in the case of the opposition "Senate Bloc". The hypothesis has proven to be accurate. Compared to non-partisan local governments, GM local governments are less likely to be supported and receive less in relative terms under the two CGFLI competition tranches. GM local governments are also in a worse position than Senate bloc local governments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
25.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
(Correct) Calculation of Payment During Annual Leave and Allowance in Lieu of Leave not Taken in the Public and Private Sectors and the Impact of the Case-law of the Court of Justice on the Decision-making of the Slovenian Courts The Importance of the Application of Controlling in the Management of Public Enterprises whose Founders are Local Self-government Units: The Example of Republic of Serbia The Development of Innovation Knowledge Management System in Tangerang Regency Local Government Vertical Upward Accountability, Oversight, and the Intervention Mechanism in South Africa Position of the Local Development Fee in the System of Local Taxes and Fees in the Slovak Republic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1