a2a琼脂与Muller Hinton琼脂培养基用于透析水中微生物监测的比较

Iman Pouladi, S. Delfani, B. Hadian, S. Soroush, K. Anbari, Faranak Rezaei
{"title":"a2a琼脂与Muller Hinton琼脂培养基用于透析水中微生物监测的比较","authors":"Iman Pouladi, S. Delfani, B. Hadian, S. Soroush, K. Anbari, Faranak Rezaei","doi":"10.22037/AMLS.V6.32905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Microbiological culture of dialysis water is a routine safety measure. In, Khorramabad laboratories perform these cultures on Muller Hinton Agar (MHA) at 35–378C for 48 h, not on the Reasoner’s 2A agar (R2A agar) at 17–238oC for 7 days recommended by international standards, the objective of the present study was the comparison of the efficiency of R2A and MHA media in the counting of heterotrophic bacteria in the samples of water collected in dialysis centers from 2 hospitals in Khorramabad, from September to November 2019. \nMethods: A total of 165 samples of treated water in dialysis centers were collected aseptically and then transported in ice‑packs to the Department of Medical Microbiology of the Lorestan University of Medical Sciences and the pour plate technique was carried out for the enumerating of heterotrophic bacteria. Finally, bacterial colonies were counted after incubation at 34±2oC for 48 hours on MHA and 25oC for 1 week on R2A. \nResults: Results showed heterotrophic bacterial counts in R2A were greater than those in MHA in 89% of the samples, so enumeration of heterotrophic bacteria should be carried out in R2A agar associated with longer incubation times, because of the greater sensitivity. The proportion of water samples yielding colony counts ≥200 CFU/mL by R2A -7d was significantly different from the proportion by MHA-48h (p<0.001). \nConclusion: The results proposed using R2A agar combined with relative low culture temperature (20-25°C), and an extended incubation time (7-10 days) is more efficient. However, as the spectrum of bacterial contamination is not similar for dialysis centers and countries, many studies using different media and culture parameters are required to confirm this. \n*Corresponding Author: Faranak Rezaei; Email: Rezaei.f@lums.ac.ir \nPlease cite this article as: Pouladi I, Delfani S, Hadian B, Soroush S, Anbari K, Rezaei F. Comparison of Reasoner’s 2A Agar and Muller Hinton Agar Media for Microbiological Monitoring of Dialysis Water. Arch Med Lab Sci. 2020;6:1-5 (e10). https://doi.org/10.22037/amls.v6.32905","PeriodicalId":18401,"journal":{"name":"Medical laboratory sciences","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Reasoner’s 2A Agar and Muller Hinton Agar Media for Microbiological Monitoring of Dialysis Water\",\"authors\":\"Iman Pouladi, S. Delfani, B. Hadian, S. Soroush, K. Anbari, Faranak Rezaei\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/AMLS.V6.32905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: Microbiological culture of dialysis water is a routine safety measure. In, Khorramabad laboratories perform these cultures on Muller Hinton Agar (MHA) at 35–378C for 48 h, not on the Reasoner’s 2A agar (R2A agar) at 17–238oC for 7 days recommended by international standards, the objective of the present study was the comparison of the efficiency of R2A and MHA media in the counting of heterotrophic bacteria in the samples of water collected in dialysis centers from 2 hospitals in Khorramabad, from September to November 2019. \\nMethods: A total of 165 samples of treated water in dialysis centers were collected aseptically and then transported in ice‑packs to the Department of Medical Microbiology of the Lorestan University of Medical Sciences and the pour plate technique was carried out for the enumerating of heterotrophic bacteria. Finally, bacterial colonies were counted after incubation at 34±2oC for 48 hours on MHA and 25oC for 1 week on R2A. \\nResults: Results showed heterotrophic bacterial counts in R2A were greater than those in MHA in 89% of the samples, so enumeration of heterotrophic bacteria should be carried out in R2A agar associated with longer incubation times, because of the greater sensitivity. The proportion of water samples yielding colony counts ≥200 CFU/mL by R2A -7d was significantly different from the proportion by MHA-48h (p<0.001). \\nConclusion: The results proposed using R2A agar combined with relative low culture temperature (20-25°C), and an extended incubation time (7-10 days) is more efficient. However, as the spectrum of bacterial contamination is not similar for dialysis centers and countries, many studies using different media and culture parameters are required to confirm this. \\n*Corresponding Author: Faranak Rezaei; Email: Rezaei.f@lums.ac.ir \\nPlease cite this article as: Pouladi I, Delfani S, Hadian B, Soroush S, Anbari K, Rezaei F. Comparison of Reasoner’s 2A Agar and Muller Hinton Agar Media for Microbiological Monitoring of Dialysis Water. Arch Med Lab Sci. 2020;6:1-5 (e10). https://doi.org/10.22037/amls.v6.32905\",\"PeriodicalId\":18401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical laboratory sciences\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical laboratory sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/AMLS.V6.32905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/AMLS.V6.32905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:透析水中微生物培养是一项常规的安全措施。在霍拉马巴德实验室中,这些培养在35-378C的Muller Hinton琼脂(MHA)上进行48小时,而不是在国际标准推荐的17 - 238℃的Reasoner 's 2A琼脂(R2A琼脂)上进行7天,本研究的目的是比较R2A和MHA培养基对2019年9月至11月在霍拉马巴德两家医院透析中心收集的水样中异养细菌计数的效率。方法:对165份透析中心处理后的水进行无菌收集,用冰袋运输至洛雷斯坦医科大学医学微生物学系,采用倒盘法进行异养菌计数。最后,在34±20℃MHA上孵育48小时,在25℃R2A上孵育1周,计数菌落。结果:89%的样品中,R2A中的异养细菌数量大于MHA,因此,由于R2A琼脂的敏感性较高,因此应在孵育时间较长的R2A琼脂中进行异养细菌的计数。经R2A -7d处理的水样菌落计数≥200 CFU/mL的比例与经MHA-48h处理的比例差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。结论:采用R2A琼脂结合较低的培养温度(20-25℃),延长培养时间(7-10 d)效果更好。然而,由于透析中心和国家的细菌污染谱不相似,需要使用不同的培养基和培养参数进行许多研究来证实这一点。*通讯作者:Faranak Rezaei;Pouladi I, Delfani S, Hadian B, Soroush S, Anbari K, Rezaei F. Reasoner’S 2A琼脂和Muller Hinton琼脂培养基用于透析水中微生物监测的比较。中华医学杂志,2020;6:1-5 (e10)。https://doi.org/10.22037/amls.v6.32905
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Reasoner’s 2A Agar and Muller Hinton Agar Media for Microbiological Monitoring of Dialysis Water
Background and Aim: Microbiological culture of dialysis water is a routine safety measure. In, Khorramabad laboratories perform these cultures on Muller Hinton Agar (MHA) at 35–378C for 48 h, not on the Reasoner’s 2A agar (R2A agar) at 17–238oC for 7 days recommended by international standards, the objective of the present study was the comparison of the efficiency of R2A and MHA media in the counting of heterotrophic bacteria in the samples of water collected in dialysis centers from 2 hospitals in Khorramabad, from September to November 2019. Methods: A total of 165 samples of treated water in dialysis centers were collected aseptically and then transported in ice‑packs to the Department of Medical Microbiology of the Lorestan University of Medical Sciences and the pour plate technique was carried out for the enumerating of heterotrophic bacteria. Finally, bacterial colonies were counted after incubation at 34±2oC for 48 hours on MHA and 25oC for 1 week on R2A. Results: Results showed heterotrophic bacterial counts in R2A were greater than those in MHA in 89% of the samples, so enumeration of heterotrophic bacteria should be carried out in R2A agar associated with longer incubation times, because of the greater sensitivity. The proportion of water samples yielding colony counts ≥200 CFU/mL by R2A -7d was significantly different from the proportion by MHA-48h (p<0.001). Conclusion: The results proposed using R2A agar combined with relative low culture temperature (20-25°C), and an extended incubation time (7-10 days) is more efficient. However, as the spectrum of bacterial contamination is not similar for dialysis centers and countries, many studies using different media and culture parameters are required to confirm this. *Corresponding Author: Faranak Rezaei; Email: Rezaei.f@lums.ac.ir Please cite this article as: Pouladi I, Delfani S, Hadian B, Soroush S, Anbari K, Rezaei F. Comparison of Reasoner’s 2A Agar and Muller Hinton Agar Media for Microbiological Monitoring of Dialysis Water. Arch Med Lab Sci. 2020;6:1-5 (e10). https://doi.org/10.22037/amls.v6.32905
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Molecular Typing of Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from Patients in Gorgan by Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA-PCR (RAPD-PCR) Formulating a New Pharmaceutical Drug; Acetaminophen Tablet Containing N-acetyl Cysteine, To Alleviate the Severity of Liver Damage in Rats: Phase I, Animal Study The Expression Level of CCDC26 and FOXCUT Genes in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia A Review of SARS-CoV-2 Genetic and Structure: Hot Cellular Targets for Virus Entry: No Evidence of Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Individuals with Cardiovascular Disease in Mashhad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1