{"title":"反馈和显性修辞教学对高等教育英语学生写作水平的影响","authors":"Luis Alfonso González Rodríguez","doi":"10.28914/atlantis-2020-42.1.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolAunque la eficacia del feedback sobre la competencia escrita de los estudiantes de una lengua extranjera ha sido ampliamente analizada y ha suscitado una gran controversia entre defensores y detractores, todavia es posible investigar en mayor profundidad como puede integrarse en el proceso de aprendizaje para mejorar la produccion escrita del alumnado. Este articulo demuestra las ventajas de combinar el feedback con la instruccion explicita de las convenciones retoricas para mejorar la competencia escrita del alumnado en el contexto de la educacion superior. En un estudio longitudinal de la produccion escrita de cuatro grupos de estudiantes se investigaron tres variables: el efecto del feedback, el efecto de la instruccion explicita y la combinacion de ambos, junto con un grupo de control que no recibio tratamiento. Los alumnos fueron asignados a cada grupo en base a la asistencia y a las tareas realizadas y se compararon los resultados de los analisis de la produccion escrita de cada grupo, los cuales confirman que el grupo que recibio un tratamiento combinado obtuvo mejores notas y demostro un mayor dominio de las microdestrezas. Ademas, se demostro que ni el feedback ni la instruccion explicita por separado son tan eficaces para mejorar la competencia escrita como la combinacion de ambos. EnglishThe efficacy of feedback on EFL students’ writing proficiency has been researched extensively and has also sparked off considerable controversy among detractors and supporters alike. However, there is still room for further investigation on how feedback can better contribute to students’ writing performance and how it can be fully integrated into the learning process. This article empirically demonstrates the learning advantages of combining both feedback and explicit rhetorical instruction for improving EFL students’ writing skills in the context of higher education. In a longitudinal study of the rhetorical competence of students’ written production carried out over a semester, three treatment variables were investigated: the effect of feedback, the effect of explicit instruction and the combination of both, along with a control condition of no treatment at all. Students were allocated to a treatment group on the basis of their attendance and work profile and the results of the analysis of the written production of each group were compared. The findings confirm not only that the group that received the combined treatment achieved higher grades and displayed a better control of relevant microskills in their written production, but also that neither feedback nor explicit instruction alone proved as effective in terms of rhetorical competence as the combination of the two variables.","PeriodicalId":54016,"journal":{"name":"Atlantis-Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Feedback and Explicit Rhetorical Instruction on EFL Students’ Writing Proficiency in Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"Luis Alfonso González Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.28914/atlantis-2020-42.1.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"espanolAunque la eficacia del feedback sobre la competencia escrita de los estudiantes de una lengua extranjera ha sido ampliamente analizada y ha suscitado una gran controversia entre defensores y detractores, todavia es posible investigar en mayor profundidad como puede integrarse en el proceso de aprendizaje para mejorar la produccion escrita del alumnado. Este articulo demuestra las ventajas de combinar el feedback con la instruccion explicita de las convenciones retoricas para mejorar la competencia escrita del alumnado en el contexto de la educacion superior. En un estudio longitudinal de la produccion escrita de cuatro grupos de estudiantes se investigaron tres variables: el efecto del feedback, el efecto de la instruccion explicita y la combinacion de ambos, junto con un grupo de control que no recibio tratamiento. Los alumnos fueron asignados a cada grupo en base a la asistencia y a las tareas realizadas y se compararon los resultados de los analisis de la produccion escrita de cada grupo, los cuales confirman que el grupo que recibio un tratamiento combinado obtuvo mejores notas y demostro un mayor dominio de las microdestrezas. Ademas, se demostro que ni el feedback ni la instruccion explicita por separado son tan eficaces para mejorar la competencia escrita como la combinacion de ambos. EnglishThe efficacy of feedback on EFL students’ writing proficiency has been researched extensively and has also sparked off considerable controversy among detractors and supporters alike. However, there is still room for further investigation on how feedback can better contribute to students’ writing performance and how it can be fully integrated into the learning process. This article empirically demonstrates the learning advantages of combining both feedback and explicit rhetorical instruction for improving EFL students’ writing skills in the context of higher education. In a longitudinal study of the rhetorical competence of students’ written production carried out over a semester, three treatment variables were investigated: the effect of feedback, the effect of explicit instruction and the combination of both, along with a control condition of no treatment at all. Students were allocated to a treatment group on the basis of their attendance and work profile and the results of the analysis of the written production of each group were compared. The findings confirm not only that the group that received the combined treatment achieved higher grades and displayed a better control of relevant microskills in their written production, but also that neither feedback nor explicit instruction alone proved as effective in terms of rhetorical competence as the combination of the two variables.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atlantis-Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atlantis-Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28914/atlantis-2020-42.1.07\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atlantis-Journal of the Spanish Association of Anglo-American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28914/atlantis-2020-42.1.07","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
espanolAunque竞争法书面反馈的效力外语的学生在很大程度上已经分析和辩护之间引起了很大的争议和批评,仍是可能的调查过程中的最大可以融入深度学习在提高的学生写的。在这篇文章中,我们提出了一种方法,将反馈与口头惯例的明确指导相结合,以提高学生在高等教育背景下的写作能力。在一项对四组学生书面创作的纵向研究中,研究了三个变量:反馈效应、明确教学效应和两者的结合,以及未接受治疗的对照组。被分配到每一个学生团体和援助的基础上开展的工作并比较了书面的分析结果,其中每个组你确认小组曾经接受联合治疗获得更好的成绩和进一步掌握microdestrezas这样的呵护。此外,反馈和单独的明确指导在提高写作能力方面不如两者的结合有效。EnglishThe . on成就人生students ' writing反馈资格的人选已researched extensively and还相当sparked off 27 detractors和supporters alike。然而,反馈如何能更好地促进学生的写作表现,以及如何将反馈充分融入学习过程,仍有进一步研究的空间。本文实证论证了在高等教育的背景下,将反馈与明确的修辞指导结合起来提高EFL学生写作技能的学习优势。在一项关于学生写作能力的纵向研究中,研究了三个变量的处理:反馈效应、明确指导效应和两者的结合,以及完全不处理的控制条件。根据学生的出勤率和工作情况以及对每个小组书面产出的分析结果进行比较,将学生分配到一个治疗小组。The confirm not only that The group that received The combined待遇一高等项目情况和displayed有助于更好地控制相关microskills列入生产,确保既不反馈,也明确修改孤独,而且证明有效in terms of rhetorical事故专职投诉“过分of The two变数。
The Impact of Feedback and Explicit Rhetorical Instruction on EFL Students’ Writing Proficiency in Higher Education
espanolAunque la eficacia del feedback sobre la competencia escrita de los estudiantes de una lengua extranjera ha sido ampliamente analizada y ha suscitado una gran controversia entre defensores y detractores, todavia es posible investigar en mayor profundidad como puede integrarse en el proceso de aprendizaje para mejorar la produccion escrita del alumnado. Este articulo demuestra las ventajas de combinar el feedback con la instruccion explicita de las convenciones retoricas para mejorar la competencia escrita del alumnado en el contexto de la educacion superior. En un estudio longitudinal de la produccion escrita de cuatro grupos de estudiantes se investigaron tres variables: el efecto del feedback, el efecto de la instruccion explicita y la combinacion de ambos, junto con un grupo de control que no recibio tratamiento. Los alumnos fueron asignados a cada grupo en base a la asistencia y a las tareas realizadas y se compararon los resultados de los analisis de la produccion escrita de cada grupo, los cuales confirman que el grupo que recibio un tratamiento combinado obtuvo mejores notas y demostro un mayor dominio de las microdestrezas. Ademas, se demostro que ni el feedback ni la instruccion explicita por separado son tan eficaces para mejorar la competencia escrita como la combinacion de ambos. EnglishThe efficacy of feedback on EFL students’ writing proficiency has been researched extensively and has also sparked off considerable controversy among detractors and supporters alike. However, there is still room for further investigation on how feedback can better contribute to students’ writing performance and how it can be fully integrated into the learning process. This article empirically demonstrates the learning advantages of combining both feedback and explicit rhetorical instruction for improving EFL students’ writing skills in the context of higher education. In a longitudinal study of the rhetorical competence of students’ written production carried out over a semester, three treatment variables were investigated: the effect of feedback, the effect of explicit instruction and the combination of both, along with a control condition of no treatment at all. Students were allocated to a treatment group on the basis of their attendance and work profile and the results of the analysis of the written production of each group were compared. The findings confirm not only that the group that received the combined treatment achieved higher grades and displayed a better control of relevant microskills in their written production, but also that neither feedback nor explicit instruction alone proved as effective in terms of rhetorical competence as the combination of the two variables.