混合战争的悖论:论辩论中实用主义的成因及其影响

IF 0.3 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Obrana a Strategie-Defence & Strategy Pub Date : 2018-12-15 DOI:10.3849/1802-7199.18.2018.02.089-100
Vojtěch Bahenský
{"title":"混合战争的悖论:论辩论中实用主义的成因及其影响","authors":"Vojtěch Bahenský","doi":"10.3849/1802-7199.18.2018.02.089-100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to analyse current state of the debate about hybrid war concept, focusing on the paradox of its success despite broad expert critique. The article specifically discusses pragmatism in use of the concept by institutions and authors as an explanation of the current situation. Finally, it analyses its possible causes, with special attention to its development and conceptual quality, and its possible implications.","PeriodicalId":40204,"journal":{"name":"Obrana a Strategie-Defence & Strategy","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PARADOX OF HYBRID WAR: On Causes and Implications of Pragmatism in the Debate\",\"authors\":\"Vojtěch Bahenský\",\"doi\":\"10.3849/1802-7199.18.2018.02.089-100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this article is to analyse current state of the debate about hybrid war concept, focusing on the paradox of its success despite broad expert critique. The article specifically discusses pragmatism in use of the concept by institutions and authors as an explanation of the current situation. Finally, it analyses its possible causes, with special attention to its development and conceptual quality, and its possible implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obrana a Strategie-Defence & Strategy\",\"volume\":\"108 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obrana a Strategie-Defence & Strategy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3849/1802-7199.18.2018.02.089-100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obrana a Strategie-Defence & Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3849/1802-7199.18.2018.02.089-100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是分析关于混合战争概念的争论现状,重点关注其成功的悖论,尽管广泛的专家批评。本文具体讨论了机构和作者对实用主义概念的使用,作为对现状的解释。最后,分析了其可能的原因,特别关注其发展和概念质量,以及可能的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PARADOX OF HYBRID WAR: On Causes and Implications of Pragmatism in the Debate
The aim of this article is to analyse current state of the debate about hybrid war concept, focusing on the paradox of its success despite broad expert critique. The article specifically discusses pragmatism in use of the concept by institutions and authors as an explanation of the current situation. Finally, it analyses its possible causes, with special attention to its development and conceptual quality, and its possible implications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
UNDERSTANDING MODERN COGNITIVE WAR IN THE GLOBAL DIMENSION, ITS GENESIS IN THE UKRAINIAN CONTEXT CHARACTER OF WAR: HOW TO UNDERSTAND IT? AN ALTERNATIVE MODEL FOR DETERMINING THE RATIONAL AMOUNT OF FUNDS ALLOCATED TO DEFENCE OF THE CR. A RESILIENT SOLDIER, A RESILIENT STATE NO LONGER IN THE SHADOW
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1