混凝土的扩展朗肯破坏准则

A. Windisch
{"title":"混凝土的扩展朗肯破坏准则","authors":"A. Windisch","doi":"10.32970/cs.2022.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As possible failure criteria MC2010 refers to those of Rankine, Drucker-Prager and Mohr-Coulomb, respectively, and to modifications or combinations of them. After a brief overview of these failure criteria the characteristics of Mohr-circle are described. Next chapter discusses why the Modified Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion fails in case of concrete. Displaying the Mohr-circles of different bi- and triaxial test series reveal that neither the straight nor the parabolic failure criteria fit. The failure patterns of uniaxial compressive and tensile test specimens prove that concrete fails due to principal tensile stresses/strains in separation and concrete is not a frictional material. The proposed Extended Rankine failure criteria are based directly on the principal stresses. The criteria limit the greatest- and the actual smallest principal stress, respectively. This latter is function of the two other principal stresses. It is shown that the Ultimate Strength Surface cannot be properly described as stated by CEB Bulletin Nr. 156.","PeriodicalId":87278,"journal":{"name":"International journal of concrete structures & materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extended Rankine failure criteria for concrete\",\"authors\":\"A. Windisch\",\"doi\":\"10.32970/cs.2022.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As possible failure criteria MC2010 refers to those of Rankine, Drucker-Prager and Mohr-Coulomb, respectively, and to modifications or combinations of them. After a brief overview of these failure criteria the characteristics of Mohr-circle are described. Next chapter discusses why the Modified Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion fails in case of concrete. Displaying the Mohr-circles of different bi- and triaxial test series reveal that neither the straight nor the parabolic failure criteria fit. The failure patterns of uniaxial compressive and tensile test specimens prove that concrete fails due to principal tensile stresses/strains in separation and concrete is not a frictional material. The proposed Extended Rankine failure criteria are based directly on the principal stresses. The criteria limit the greatest- and the actual smallest principal stress, respectively. This latter is function of the two other principal stresses. It is shown that the Ultimate Strength Surface cannot be properly described as stated by CEB Bulletin Nr. 156.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of concrete structures & materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of concrete structures & materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32970/cs.2022.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of concrete structures & materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32970/cs.2022.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为可能的失效准则,MC2010分别是Rankine、Drucker-Prager和Mohr-Coulomb的失效准则,以及它们的修改或组合。在简要概述了这些失效准则后,描述了莫尔圆的特征。下一章讨论了修正莫尔-库仑破坏准则在混凝土中失效的原因。通过对不同双轴和三轴试验序列的莫尔圆分析,发现直线型和抛物线型的破坏准则都不符合。单轴压缩和拉伸试件的破坏模式证明了混凝土的破坏是由于分离时的主拉应力/应变造成的,混凝土不是摩擦材料。所提出的扩展朗肯破坏准则直接基于主应力。这些标准分别限制了最大主应力和实际最小主应力。后者是另外两个主要应力的函数。结果表明,极限强度面不能像CEB公报156号所规定的那样恰当地描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Extended Rankine failure criteria for concrete
As possible failure criteria MC2010 refers to those of Rankine, Drucker-Prager and Mohr-Coulomb, respectively, and to modifications or combinations of them. After a brief overview of these failure criteria the characteristics of Mohr-circle are described. Next chapter discusses why the Modified Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion fails in case of concrete. Displaying the Mohr-circles of different bi- and triaxial test series reveal that neither the straight nor the parabolic failure criteria fit. The failure patterns of uniaxial compressive and tensile test specimens prove that concrete fails due to principal tensile stresses/strains in separation and concrete is not a frictional material. The proposed Extended Rankine failure criteria are based directly on the principal stresses. The criteria limit the greatest- and the actual smallest principal stress, respectively. This latter is function of the two other principal stresses. It is shown that the Ultimate Strength Surface cannot be properly described as stated by CEB Bulletin Nr. 156.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3D printing technology in medicine - review Structural aspects of topology optimization in 3D printing of concrete Extended Rankine failure criteria for concrete 3D concrete printing: Variety of aggregates, admixtures and supplementary materials 3D concrete printing structural and non-structural solutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1