研究人员的实验策略

IF 2.1 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1177/87560879231164238
Shari Kraber
{"title":"研究人员的实验策略","authors":"Shari Kraber","doi":"10.1177/87560879231164238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A successful research strategy lays out a path with small steps that allows for changes in direction along the way. The “SCO” flowchart for experimenters (Figure 1) is a prime example of such a template for success. Its tried-and-true core is screening (“S”), characterization (“C”) and optimization (“O”). One last, but perhaps most important, step is added: Confirmation. Let’s dive into the SCO strategy for researchers and find out what makes it work so well. The starting point is the Screening design. Screening designs provide a broad, but shallow, search for previously unknown process factors. Use a two-level factorial design to quickly identify variables that affect the responses. TIP – to keep the number of runs lower, don’t bother screening factors that are already known to affect your responses! Newly discovered factors—the “vital few” will carry forward into the next phase of experimentation, with the “trivial many” being set aside. By using medium-resolution (Res IV) designs, you can estimate the main effects cleanly—their effects unbiased by hidden interactions. Moving ahead to Characterization with the vital-few screened factors plus the big one(s) you originally set aside, the identification of two-factor interactions becomes the goal. This necessitates a high-resolution design (Res V or better). Be sure to add center points at this stage so you can check for curvature (non-linearity). If curvature is NOT significant, then your mission is nearly complete—all that remains is Confirmation! If curvature does emerge as being significant and important, then move on to Optimization using response surface methods (RSM). The beauty of RSM is that you can use contour and 3D surface maps to see where each response peaks. Also, via numerical optimization tools, you can pinpoint the setup of factors producing the most desirable outcome for multiple responses. Graphical optimization via overlay plots lays out a compelling visual of the sweet spot—the window where all specifications can be achieved. Last, but not least, comes Confirmation. Decide if you want to confirm one specific “optimal” location in the design space, or if your interest is in verifying a broader area.","PeriodicalId":16823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting","volume":"6 1","pages":"148 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A strategy of experimentation for researchers\",\"authors\":\"Shari Kraber\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87560879231164238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A successful research strategy lays out a path with small steps that allows for changes in direction along the way. The “SCO” flowchart for experimenters (Figure 1) is a prime example of such a template for success. Its tried-and-true core is screening (“S”), characterization (“C”) and optimization (“O”). One last, but perhaps most important, step is added: Confirmation. Let’s dive into the SCO strategy for researchers and find out what makes it work so well. The starting point is the Screening design. Screening designs provide a broad, but shallow, search for previously unknown process factors. Use a two-level factorial design to quickly identify variables that affect the responses. TIP – to keep the number of runs lower, don’t bother screening factors that are already known to affect your responses! Newly discovered factors—the “vital few” will carry forward into the next phase of experimentation, with the “trivial many” being set aside. By using medium-resolution (Res IV) designs, you can estimate the main effects cleanly—their effects unbiased by hidden interactions. Moving ahead to Characterization with the vital-few screened factors plus the big one(s) you originally set aside, the identification of two-factor interactions becomes the goal. This necessitates a high-resolution design (Res V or better). Be sure to add center points at this stage so you can check for curvature (non-linearity). If curvature is NOT significant, then your mission is nearly complete—all that remains is Confirmation! If curvature does emerge as being significant and important, then move on to Optimization using response surface methods (RSM). The beauty of RSM is that you can use contour and 3D surface maps to see where each response peaks. Also, via numerical optimization tools, you can pinpoint the setup of factors producing the most desirable outcome for multiple responses. Graphical optimization via overlay plots lays out a compelling visual of the sweet spot—the window where all specifications can be achieved. Last, but not least, comes Confirmation. Decide if you want to confirm one specific “optimal” location in the design space, or if your interest is in verifying a broader area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"148 - 150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87560879231164238\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87560879231164238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个成功的研究策略是用小步骤规划出一条道路,允许在前进的道路上改变方向。实验人员的“SCO”流程图(图1)是这种成功模板的主要例子。其久经考验的核心是筛选(S)、表征(C)和优化(O)。最后,但也许是最重要的一步是:确认。让我们深入研究研究人员的上海合作组织战略,并找出是什么使它如此有效。首先是筛选设计。筛选设计为以前未知的工艺因素提供了广泛但肤浅的搜索。使用双水平因子设计来快速识别影响响应的变量。提示:为了降低测试次数,不要去筛选那些已知会影响你反应的因素!新发现的因素——“至关重要的少数因素”将继续进行下一阶段的实验,而“微不足道的许多因素”将被搁置一边。通过使用中分辨率(Res IV)设计,你可以清晰地估计主效应——它们的效应不受隐藏相互作用的影响。将筛选的几个重要因素加上您最初搁置的几个重要因素继续进行特性描述,确定两个因素的相互作用成为目标。这就需要高分辨率的设计(分辨率V或更高)。确保在此阶段添加中心点,以便您可以检查曲率(非线性)。如果曲率不重要,那么你的任务就差不多完成了——剩下的就是确认了!如果曲率确实是有意义和重要的,那么继续使用响应面方法(RSM)进行优化。RSM的美妙之处在于,您可以使用等高线和3D表面图来查看每个响应的峰值。此外,通过数值优化工具,您可以精确定位为多个响应产生最理想结果的因素设置。通过叠加图进行的图形优化展示了一个引人注目的最佳点视觉效果——所有规格都可以实现的窗口。最后,但并非最不重要的是坚信礼。决定你是想在设计空间中确认一个特定的“最佳”位置,还是想要验证一个更大的区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A strategy of experimentation for researchers
A successful research strategy lays out a path with small steps that allows for changes in direction along the way. The “SCO” flowchart for experimenters (Figure 1) is a prime example of such a template for success. Its tried-and-true core is screening (“S”), characterization (“C”) and optimization (“O”). One last, but perhaps most important, step is added: Confirmation. Let’s dive into the SCO strategy for researchers and find out what makes it work so well. The starting point is the Screening design. Screening designs provide a broad, but shallow, search for previously unknown process factors. Use a two-level factorial design to quickly identify variables that affect the responses. TIP – to keep the number of runs lower, don’t bother screening factors that are already known to affect your responses! Newly discovered factors—the “vital few” will carry forward into the next phase of experimentation, with the “trivial many” being set aside. By using medium-resolution (Res IV) designs, you can estimate the main effects cleanly—their effects unbiased by hidden interactions. Moving ahead to Characterization with the vital-few screened factors plus the big one(s) you originally set aside, the identification of two-factor interactions becomes the goal. This necessitates a high-resolution design (Res V or better). Be sure to add center points at this stage so you can check for curvature (non-linearity). If curvature is NOT significant, then your mission is nearly complete—all that remains is Confirmation! If curvature does emerge as being significant and important, then move on to Optimization using response surface methods (RSM). The beauty of RSM is that you can use contour and 3D surface maps to see where each response peaks. Also, via numerical optimization tools, you can pinpoint the setup of factors producing the most desirable outcome for multiple responses. Graphical optimization via overlay plots lays out a compelling visual of the sweet spot—the window where all specifications can be achieved. Last, but not least, comes Confirmation. Decide if you want to confirm one specific “optimal” location in the design space, or if your interest is in verifying a broader area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting
Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting 工程技术-材料科学:膜
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Plastic Film and Sheeting improves communication concerning plastic film and sheeting with major emphasis on the propogation of knowledge which will serve to advance the science and technology of these products and thus better serve industry and the ultimate consumer. The journal reports on the wide variety of advances that are rapidly taking place in the technology of plastic film and sheeting. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Effects of Lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide loading on thermal, mechanical and ion conducting properties of specialty interlayer films derived from scrap Polyvinyl butyral Industry News Vol 40(3) Making the most from measuring counts Coating of micropolar fluid during non-isothermal reverse roll coating phenomena Partially phosphorylated poly(vinyl alcohol) – A promising candidate in corrosion protection of magnesium for the biomedical industry?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1