我们能填补空白吗?编写自定义肿瘤途径vs单独提出NCCN首选建议

R. Maniago, Marcello Ricottone, G. Calip, Taylor Dias-Foundas, James R. Hamrick
{"title":"我们能填补空白吗?编写自定义肿瘤途径vs单独提出NCCN首选建议","authors":"R. Maniago, Marcello Ricottone, G. Calip, Taylor Dias-Foundas, James R. Hamrick","doi":"10.25270/jcp.2023.05.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of clinical decision support (CDS) tools may help to optimize the delivery of value-based cancer care and reduce variations in treatment. Flat­iron Assist (FA) is an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded CDS tool that is locally customizable and designed to aid medical oncologists in selecting and documenting National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guideline–con­cordant, NCCN Preferred, and/or customized treatment regimens. The study aimed to compare the availability of NCCN Preferred recommendations to cus­tom preferred pathways in FA, and to assess provider concordance with the pre­ferred suggestions. This retrospective, observational, real-world study analyzed 16,722 orders for breast, non-small cell lung, and colon cancers over 11 months, placed at 12 US-based sites of care by 522 clinicians in hospital and community-based cancer clinics. Of the 13,140 orders placed at sites where NCCN Preferred was available, an NCCN Preferred option existed for 7,680 orders, resulting in 58.5% relative coverage for the clinical scenarios in scope. Of the 3,261 orders placed where a custom preferred pathway was available, a custom preferred op­tion existed for 2,320 orders, resulting in 71.1% relative coverage for the clinical scenarios in scope (rate ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.25; P < .001 fa­voring custom preferred pathways). When a preferred option was available, pro­viders’ selection rates were similar. The study highlights the opportunity for cus­tom preferred pathways to guide oncologists and provide clearer guidance in cases where NCCN Preferred is not available. FA’s design, with the ability to pro­vide a local preference, and the option to highlight treatment regimens based on efficacy, safety, and affordability, makes it a valuable tool for oncologists to navigate the complex treatment landscape. The study emphasizes the need for accessible and accurate information to ensure high-quality cancer care delivery.","PeriodicalId":73670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","volume":"71 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can We Fill in the Gaps? Authoring Custom Oncology Pathways vs Surfacing NCCN Preferred Recommendations Alone\",\"authors\":\"R. Maniago, Marcello Ricottone, G. Calip, Taylor Dias-Foundas, James R. Hamrick\",\"doi\":\"10.25270/jcp.2023.05.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of clinical decision support (CDS) tools may help to optimize the delivery of value-based cancer care and reduce variations in treatment. Flat­iron Assist (FA) is an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded CDS tool that is locally customizable and designed to aid medical oncologists in selecting and documenting National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guideline–con­cordant, NCCN Preferred, and/or customized treatment regimens. The study aimed to compare the availability of NCCN Preferred recommendations to cus­tom preferred pathways in FA, and to assess provider concordance with the pre­ferred suggestions. This retrospective, observational, real-world study analyzed 16,722 orders for breast, non-small cell lung, and colon cancers over 11 months, placed at 12 US-based sites of care by 522 clinicians in hospital and community-based cancer clinics. Of the 13,140 orders placed at sites where NCCN Preferred was available, an NCCN Preferred option existed for 7,680 orders, resulting in 58.5% relative coverage for the clinical scenarios in scope. Of the 3,261 orders placed where a custom preferred pathway was available, a custom preferred op­tion existed for 2,320 orders, resulting in 71.1% relative coverage for the clinical scenarios in scope (rate ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.25; P < .001 fa­voring custom preferred pathways). When a preferred option was available, pro­viders’ selection rates were similar. The study highlights the opportunity for cus­tom preferred pathways to guide oncologists and provide clearer guidance in cases where NCCN Preferred is not available. FA’s design, with the ability to pro­vide a local preference, and the option to highlight treatment regimens based on efficacy, safety, and affordability, makes it a valuable tool for oncologists to navigate the complex treatment landscape. The study emphasizes the need for accessible and accurate information to ensure high-quality cancer care delivery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2023.05.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical pathways : the foundation of value-based care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jcp.2023.05.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床决策支持(CDS)工具的使用可能有助于优化基于价值的癌症护理的提供,并减少治疗的变化。Flat-iron Assist (FA)是一种嵌入电子健康记录(EHR)的CDS工具,可在当地定制,旨在帮助医学肿瘤学家选择和记录国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南一致、NCCN首选和/或定制的治疗方案。本研究旨在比较NCCN优选建议与FA患者自定义优选途径的可用性,并评估提供者与优选建议的一致性。这项回顾性、观察性、真实世界的研究分析了11个月内美国12个医院和社区癌症诊所的522名临床医生对乳腺癌、非小细胞肺癌和结肠癌的16,722份医嘱。在提供NCCN首选方案的站点下的13,140份订单中,有7,680份订单中存在NCCN首选方案,因此在范围内临床方案的相对覆盖率为58.5%。在提供自定义首选途径的3261个订单中,有2320个订单存在自定义首选选项,导致范围内临床场景的相对覆盖率为71.1%(比率比1.22,95%置信区间1.19-1.25;P < 0.001支持自定义首选途径)。当有首选方案时,供应商的选择率相似。该研究强调了自定义首选途径指导肿瘤学家的机会,并在无法获得NCCN首选途径的情况下提供更清晰的指导。FA的设计能够提供本地偏好,并根据疗效、安全性和可负担性突出治疗方案,使其成为肿瘤学家在复杂的治疗前景中导航的宝贵工具。该研究强调了获取准确信息的必要性,以确保提供高质量的癌症治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can We Fill in the Gaps? Authoring Custom Oncology Pathways vs Surfacing NCCN Preferred Recommendations Alone
The use of clinical decision support (CDS) tools may help to optimize the delivery of value-based cancer care and reduce variations in treatment. Flat­iron Assist (FA) is an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded CDS tool that is locally customizable and designed to aid medical oncologists in selecting and documenting National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guideline–con­cordant, NCCN Preferred, and/or customized treatment regimens. The study aimed to compare the availability of NCCN Preferred recommendations to cus­tom preferred pathways in FA, and to assess provider concordance with the pre­ferred suggestions. This retrospective, observational, real-world study analyzed 16,722 orders for breast, non-small cell lung, and colon cancers over 11 months, placed at 12 US-based sites of care by 522 clinicians in hospital and community-based cancer clinics. Of the 13,140 orders placed at sites where NCCN Preferred was available, an NCCN Preferred option existed for 7,680 orders, resulting in 58.5% relative coverage for the clinical scenarios in scope. Of the 3,261 orders placed where a custom preferred pathway was available, a custom preferred op­tion existed for 2,320 orders, resulting in 71.1% relative coverage for the clinical scenarios in scope (rate ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.25; P < .001 fa­voring custom preferred pathways). When a preferred option was available, pro­viders’ selection rates were similar. The study highlights the opportunity for cus­tom preferred pathways to guide oncologists and provide clearer guidance in cases where NCCN Preferred is not available. FA’s design, with the ability to pro­vide a local preference, and the option to highlight treatment regimens based on efficacy, safety, and affordability, makes it a valuable tool for oncologists to navigate the complex treatment landscape. The study emphasizes the need for accessible and accurate information to ensure high-quality cancer care delivery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: The Wins, The Challenges, and How We Can Deliver on Personalized Cancer Care Off-Label Use of Precision Oncology Therapeutics in Advanced Solid Cancers Following Identification of Associated Variants via Multicancer Next-Generation Sequencing Panel: A Real-World Evidence Pilot Study NGS Testing in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Leveraging Quality Measurement to Drive Equitable Cancer Care for Transgender Individuals https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/jcp/feature-story/oncology-pathways-drive-adoption-high-quality-treatment-regimens-and-deliver
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1