在抵押贷款支持证券和资产支持证券交易中评估贷款人支付的抵押贷款保险

Andrew Lipton, Shiv Rao
{"title":"在抵押贷款支持证券和资产支持证券交易中评估贷款人支付的抵押贷款保险","authors":"Andrew Lipton,&nbsp;Shiv Rao","doi":"10.1002/bref.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lender-paid mortgage insurance (MI) can provide substantial credit enhancement in mortgage-backed and mortgage-related asset-backed transactions. In some cases, lender-paid MI has contributed more than 75 per cent of the total credit enhancement for the most senior classes.</p><p>Lender-paid MI offers insurance coverage at the individual loan level. In most respects, lender-paid MI policies are generally similar to traditional borrower-paid policies. Lender-paid MI has no impact on the frequency of borrower default, but it serves to reduce the severity of loss when borrowers default.</p><p>Because lender-paid policies offer coverage on individual loans, the benefit from the policies is limited to the amounts paid by the insurer on each individual defaulted loan, ie the insurance does not ‘cross-collateralise’ the loans. Therefore, if the loss on a defaulted loan is less than the maximum coverage of the insurance policy, the additional coverage cannot be applied to losses on other defaulted loans whose claims exceed their insurance coverage. The wider the range in loss severity on defaulted loans, the less the benefit that lender-paid MI offers. The amount of credit enhancement that lender-paid MI brings to a transaction is directly related to the level of coverage, the number and quality of loans covered, and to any exclusions from coverage. The benefit is also dependent on a loan originator's business practices, particularly with respect to appraisals. Overstated appraisals may cause the MI coverage to be insufficient to cover actual losses. In addition, a servicer's ability to foreclose on defaulted loans and to process claims in a timely fashion is important, because failure to perform these actions may result in a claim adjustment or denial. Because lender-paid MI cannot be cancelled in securitised transactions, it is marginally more durable than borrower-paid MI. Finally, the benefit from lender-paid MI also depends on the rating of the insurance provider. Generally, the insurance provider should have a rating of Aa3 or higher for the Aaa classes in a transaction to get the full credit that the insurance can provide. Because the benefit is dependent on the insurer's rating, transactions that rely on mortgage insurance for a significant percentage of their total credit enhancement are susceptible to downgrade risk if the insurer's rating drops. Copyright © 2002 Henry Stewart Publications</p>","PeriodicalId":100200,"journal":{"name":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","volume":"2 1","pages":"16-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.49","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valuing lender-paid mortgage insurance in mortgage-backed security and asset-backed security transactions\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Lipton,&nbsp;Shiv Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bref.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Lender-paid mortgage insurance (MI) can provide substantial credit enhancement in mortgage-backed and mortgage-related asset-backed transactions. In some cases, lender-paid MI has contributed more than 75 per cent of the total credit enhancement for the most senior classes.</p><p>Lender-paid MI offers insurance coverage at the individual loan level. In most respects, lender-paid MI policies are generally similar to traditional borrower-paid policies. Lender-paid MI has no impact on the frequency of borrower default, but it serves to reduce the severity of loss when borrowers default.</p><p>Because lender-paid policies offer coverage on individual loans, the benefit from the policies is limited to the amounts paid by the insurer on each individual defaulted loan, ie the insurance does not ‘cross-collateralise’ the loans. Therefore, if the loss on a defaulted loan is less than the maximum coverage of the insurance policy, the additional coverage cannot be applied to losses on other defaulted loans whose claims exceed their insurance coverage. The wider the range in loss severity on defaulted loans, the less the benefit that lender-paid MI offers. The amount of credit enhancement that lender-paid MI brings to a transaction is directly related to the level of coverage, the number and quality of loans covered, and to any exclusions from coverage. The benefit is also dependent on a loan originator's business practices, particularly with respect to appraisals. Overstated appraisals may cause the MI coverage to be insufficient to cover actual losses. In addition, a servicer's ability to foreclose on defaulted loans and to process claims in a timely fashion is important, because failure to perform these actions may result in a claim adjustment or denial. Because lender-paid MI cannot be cancelled in securitised transactions, it is marginally more durable than borrower-paid MI. Finally, the benefit from lender-paid MI also depends on the rating of the insurance provider. Generally, the insurance provider should have a rating of Aa3 or higher for the Aaa classes in a transaction to get the full credit that the insurance can provide. Because the benefit is dependent on the insurer's rating, transactions that rely on mortgage insurance for a significant percentage of their total credit enhancement are susceptible to downgrade risk if the insurer's rating drops. Copyright © 2002 Henry Stewart Publications</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Briefings in Real Estate Finance\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"16-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/bref.49\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Briefings in Real Estate Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bref.49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Briefings in Real Estate Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bref.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

贷款人支付的抵押贷款保险(MI)可以在抵押贷款和抵押贷款相关的资产支持交易中提供实质性的信用增强。在某些情况下,贷款方支付的MI贡献了最高级别班级信用增强总额的75%以上。贷款人支付的MI在个人贷款层面提供保险。在大多数方面,贷款人支付的MI政策通常与传统的借款人支付的政策相似。贷款人支付的MI对借款人违约的频率没有影响,但它有助于降低借款人违约时损失的严重程度。由于贷款人支付的保单覆盖个人贷款,因此保单的收益仅限于保险公司为每笔违约贷款支付的金额,即保险公司不会对贷款进行“交叉抵押”。因此,如果违约贷款的损失低于保险单的最大保险范围,则额外的保险范围不能适用于索赔超过其保险范围的其他违约贷款的损失。违约贷款损失严重程度的范围越广,贷款人支付的MI提供的好处就越少。出借人支付的信用增强额为交易带来的信用增强额直接关系到承保范围的水平、承保的贷款数量和质量,以及任何被排除在承保范围之外的贷款。收益还取决于贷款发起人的业务实践,特别是在评估方面。高估的评估可能导致保险损失不足以弥补实际损失。此外,服务机构取消拖欠贷款的抵押品赎回权和及时处理索赔的能力也很重要,因为未能执行这些操作可能会导致索赔调整或拒绝。由于在证券化交易中,贷款人支付的信用担保不能被取消,因此它比借款人支付的信用担保更持久。最后,贷款人支付的信用担保的收益还取决于保险提供商的评级。一般来说,保险提供商应该对交易中的Aaa类拥有Aa3或更高的评级,以获得保险可以提供的全部信用。由于收益取决于保险公司的评级,如果保险公司的评级下降,依赖抵押贷款保险的交易在其总信用增强中占很大比例,则容易受到降级风险的影响。版权所有©2002 Henry Stewart Publications
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Valuing lender-paid mortgage insurance in mortgage-backed security and asset-backed security transactions

Lender-paid mortgage insurance (MI) can provide substantial credit enhancement in mortgage-backed and mortgage-related asset-backed transactions. In some cases, lender-paid MI has contributed more than 75 per cent of the total credit enhancement for the most senior classes.

Lender-paid MI offers insurance coverage at the individual loan level. In most respects, lender-paid MI policies are generally similar to traditional borrower-paid policies. Lender-paid MI has no impact on the frequency of borrower default, but it serves to reduce the severity of loss when borrowers default.

Because lender-paid policies offer coverage on individual loans, the benefit from the policies is limited to the amounts paid by the insurer on each individual defaulted loan, ie the insurance does not ‘cross-collateralise’ the loans. Therefore, if the loss on a defaulted loan is less than the maximum coverage of the insurance policy, the additional coverage cannot be applied to losses on other defaulted loans whose claims exceed their insurance coverage. The wider the range in loss severity on defaulted loans, the less the benefit that lender-paid MI offers. The amount of credit enhancement that lender-paid MI brings to a transaction is directly related to the level of coverage, the number and quality of loans covered, and to any exclusions from coverage. The benefit is also dependent on a loan originator's business practices, particularly with respect to appraisals. Overstated appraisals may cause the MI coverage to be insufficient to cover actual losses. In addition, a servicer's ability to foreclose on defaulted loans and to process claims in a timely fashion is important, because failure to perform these actions may result in a claim adjustment or denial. Because lender-paid MI cannot be cancelled in securitised transactions, it is marginally more durable than borrower-paid MI. Finally, the benefit from lender-paid MI also depends on the rating of the insurance provider. Generally, the insurance provider should have a rating of Aa3 or higher for the Aaa classes in a transaction to get the full credit that the insurance can provide. Because the benefit is dependent on the insurer's rating, transactions that rely on mortgage insurance for a significant percentage of their total credit enhancement are susceptible to downgrade risk if the insurer's rating drops. Copyright © 2002 Henry Stewart Publications

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advances in quantifying risk in commercial real estate lending Leverage in real estate investments: an optimization approach Holding period effect and home price indexes: a dynamic analysis Top 10 securitizable loan negotiations† Real estate loan delinquency, property prices and alternative income opportunities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1