{"title":"胆钙化醇与骨化三醇治疗血液透析患者继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进","authors":"H. Omrani, Ali Daraizade","doi":"10.15171/JPD.2018.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Secondary hyperparathyroidism, is a matter of concern in hemodialysis patients that cause renal osteodystrophy \neventually. \n Objectives: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of cholecalciferol with calcitriol for treating secondary \nhyperparathyroidism. \n Materials and Methods: This study is a randomized, controlled study. Around 80 patients with hyperparathyroidism (PTH >300 ρg/ \nmL) and 25(OH)D level <20 ng/mL were divided into two groups to receive cholecalciferol 50 000 IU/3 times in one week or calcitriol \n0.25 μg/daily for 12 weeks. Additionally calcium carbonate 1000-1500 mg/d/tablets is prescribed for both groups. Reduction of \nparathyroid hormone (PTH), changes of plasma albumin-corrected calcium and phosphorus and levels of 25(OH)D were analyzed. \n Results: Around 40 patients were randomized into each group. At baseline, plasma albumin-corrected calcium, phosphorus and \nintact PTH and 25(OH)D had no difference between groups. At week 12, intact PTH levels in cholecalciferol and calcitriol groups \nwere 242.38±16.38 ρg/mL and 237.84±13.65 ρg/mL in respectively. Patients who achieved target intact PTH of <300 ρg/mL were \n90% in the cholecalciferol and 95% in the calcitriol group (P = 0.447). Serum calcium and phosphorus were not significantly different \nin both groups. Serum calcium; 9.07±0.36 mg/dL versus 9.00 ± 0.38 mg/dL (P = 0.607), phosphorus; 4.81±0.55 mg/dL versus 4.15 ± \n0.42 mg/dL (P = 0.126) in cholecalciferol and calcitriol groups respectively. Furthermore, serum 25(OH)D levels significantly rise in \ncholecalciferol group. Serum 25(OH)D levels were 62.98 ±21.03 ng/mL in cholecalciferol group and 18.95±22.70 ng/mL in calcitriol \ngroup (P < 0.05). \n Conclusion: cholecalciferol can be administered to control secondary hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D(25OH) deficiency in \nhemodialysis patients . The two drugs are equally efficacious and lead to similar changes in calcium and phosphorus levels.","PeriodicalId":16657,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Parathyroid Disease","volume":"1 1","pages":"87-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cholecalciferol versus calcitriol to manage secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients\",\"authors\":\"H. Omrani, Ali Daraizade\",\"doi\":\"10.15171/JPD.2018.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Secondary hyperparathyroidism, is a matter of concern in hemodialysis patients that cause renal osteodystrophy \\neventually. \\n Objectives: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of cholecalciferol with calcitriol for treating secondary \\nhyperparathyroidism. \\n Materials and Methods: This study is a randomized, controlled study. Around 80 patients with hyperparathyroidism (PTH >300 ρg/ \\nmL) and 25(OH)D level <20 ng/mL were divided into two groups to receive cholecalciferol 50 000 IU/3 times in one week or calcitriol \\n0.25 μg/daily for 12 weeks. Additionally calcium carbonate 1000-1500 mg/d/tablets is prescribed for both groups. Reduction of \\nparathyroid hormone (PTH), changes of plasma albumin-corrected calcium and phosphorus and levels of 25(OH)D were analyzed. \\n Results: Around 40 patients were randomized into each group. At baseline, plasma albumin-corrected calcium, phosphorus and \\nintact PTH and 25(OH)D had no difference between groups. At week 12, intact PTH levels in cholecalciferol and calcitriol groups \\nwere 242.38±16.38 ρg/mL and 237.84±13.65 ρg/mL in respectively. Patients who achieved target intact PTH of <300 ρg/mL were \\n90% in the cholecalciferol and 95% in the calcitriol group (P = 0.447). Serum calcium and phosphorus were not significantly different \\nin both groups. Serum calcium; 9.07±0.36 mg/dL versus 9.00 ± 0.38 mg/dL (P = 0.607), phosphorus; 4.81±0.55 mg/dL versus 4.15 ± \\n0.42 mg/dL (P = 0.126) in cholecalciferol and calcitriol groups respectively. Furthermore, serum 25(OH)D levels significantly rise in \\ncholecalciferol group. Serum 25(OH)D levels were 62.98 ±21.03 ng/mL in cholecalciferol group and 18.95±22.70 ng/mL in calcitriol \\ngroup (P < 0.05). \\n Conclusion: cholecalciferol can be administered to control secondary hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D(25OH) deficiency in \\nhemodialysis patients . The two drugs are equally efficacious and lead to similar changes in calcium and phosphorus levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Parathyroid Disease\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"87-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Parathyroid Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15171/JPD.2018.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Parathyroid Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15171/JPD.2018.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cholecalciferol versus calcitriol to manage secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients
Introduction: Secondary hyperparathyroidism, is a matter of concern in hemodialysis patients that cause renal osteodystrophy
eventually.
Objectives: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of cholecalciferol with calcitriol for treating secondary
hyperparathyroidism.
Materials and Methods: This study is a randomized, controlled study. Around 80 patients with hyperparathyroidism (PTH >300 ρg/
mL) and 25(OH)D level <20 ng/mL were divided into two groups to receive cholecalciferol 50 000 IU/3 times in one week or calcitriol
0.25 μg/daily for 12 weeks. Additionally calcium carbonate 1000-1500 mg/d/tablets is prescribed for both groups. Reduction of
parathyroid hormone (PTH), changes of plasma albumin-corrected calcium and phosphorus and levels of 25(OH)D were analyzed.
Results: Around 40 patients were randomized into each group. At baseline, plasma albumin-corrected calcium, phosphorus and
intact PTH and 25(OH)D had no difference between groups. At week 12, intact PTH levels in cholecalciferol and calcitriol groups
were 242.38±16.38 ρg/mL and 237.84±13.65 ρg/mL in respectively. Patients who achieved target intact PTH of <300 ρg/mL were
90% in the cholecalciferol and 95% in the calcitriol group (P = 0.447). Serum calcium and phosphorus were not significantly different
in both groups. Serum calcium; 9.07±0.36 mg/dL versus 9.00 ± 0.38 mg/dL (P = 0.607), phosphorus; 4.81±0.55 mg/dL versus 4.15 ±
0.42 mg/dL (P = 0.126) in cholecalciferol and calcitriol groups respectively. Furthermore, serum 25(OH)D levels significantly rise in
cholecalciferol group. Serum 25(OH)D levels were 62.98 ±21.03 ng/mL in cholecalciferol group and 18.95±22.70 ng/mL in calcitriol
group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: cholecalciferol can be administered to control secondary hyperparathyroidism and vitamin D(25OH) deficiency in
hemodialysis patients . The two drugs are equally efficacious and lead to similar changes in calcium and phosphorus levels.