共情和系统化对幽默加工的影响:心理理论与幽默

IF 1.2 3区 心理学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Humor-International Journal of Humor Research Pub Date : 2012-02-01 DOI:10.1515/HUMOR-2012-0005
Andrea C. Samson
{"title":"共情和系统化对幽默加工的影响:心理理论与幽默","authors":"Andrea C. Samson","doi":"10.1515/HUMOR-2012-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the influence of empathizing and systemizing on cognitive and affective humor processing in two studies. Three cartoon types differing in their logical mechanisms (LMs) and cognitive requirements were presented to participants with high scores on one scale and low scores on the other (empathizers and systemizers): visual puns, semantic cartoons and Theory of Mind cartoons. Empathizers and systemizers were expected to process these cartoon types differently. While empathizers and systemizers did not differ in recognition time and comprehensibility in study one (N = 33), empathizers did portray higher funniness scores in study two (N = 55). Furthermore, empathizers more often gave emotional/motivational explanations as well as more mentalistic explanations as to why they think a cartoon is funny. In addition, Theory of Mind cartoons provoked the highest number of mentalistic explanations. This shows that stimulus characteristics (such as LMs) as well as inter-individual differences influence whether mentalizing is required and applied to processing humor, and that empathizing and systemizing influence humor appreciation.","PeriodicalId":51635,"journal":{"name":"Humor-International Journal of Humor Research","volume":"124 1","pages":"75-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of empathizing and systemizing on humor processing: Theory of Mind and humor\",\"authors\":\"Andrea C. Samson\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/HUMOR-2012-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the influence of empathizing and systemizing on cognitive and affective humor processing in two studies. Three cartoon types differing in their logical mechanisms (LMs) and cognitive requirements were presented to participants with high scores on one scale and low scores on the other (empathizers and systemizers): visual puns, semantic cartoons and Theory of Mind cartoons. Empathizers and systemizers were expected to process these cartoon types differently. While empathizers and systemizers did not differ in recognition time and comprehensibility in study one (N = 33), empathizers did portray higher funniness scores in study two (N = 55). Furthermore, empathizers more often gave emotional/motivational explanations as well as more mentalistic explanations as to why they think a cartoon is funny. In addition, Theory of Mind cartoons provoked the highest number of mentalistic explanations. This shows that stimulus characteristics (such as LMs) as well as inter-individual differences influence whether mentalizing is required and applied to processing humor, and that empathizing and systemizing influence humor appreciation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Humor-International Journal of Humor Research\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"75-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Humor-International Journal of Humor Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR-2012-0005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humor-International Journal of Humor Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR-2012-0005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

本文通过两项研究探讨了移情和系统化对认知和情感幽默加工的影响。在逻辑机制(LMs)和认知要求上不同的三种卡通类型呈现给在一个量表上得分高而在另一个量表上得分低的参与者(共情者和系统化者):视觉双关语、语义卡通和心理理论卡通。共情者和系统化者对这些卡通类型的处理方式不同。在研究一(N = 33)中,共情者和系统化者在识别时间和可理解性上没有差异,但在研究二(N = 55)中,共情者确实表现出更高的滑稽得分。此外,移情者更经常给出情感/动机的解释,以及更多的心理解释,为什么他们认为漫画很有趣。此外,《心理理论》动画片引发了最多的心理主义解释。这表明刺激特征(如LMs)和个体间差异影响幽默加工是否需要和应用心理化,移情和系统化影响幽默欣赏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of empathizing and systemizing on humor processing: Theory of Mind and humor
This paper investigates the influence of empathizing and systemizing on cognitive and affective humor processing in two studies. Three cartoon types differing in their logical mechanisms (LMs) and cognitive requirements were presented to participants with high scores on one scale and low scores on the other (empathizers and systemizers): visual puns, semantic cartoons and Theory of Mind cartoons. Empathizers and systemizers were expected to process these cartoon types differently. While empathizers and systemizers did not differ in recognition time and comprehensibility in study one (N = 33), empathizers did portray higher funniness scores in study two (N = 55). Furthermore, empathizers more often gave emotional/motivational explanations as well as more mentalistic explanations as to why they think a cartoon is funny. In addition, Theory of Mind cartoons provoked the highest number of mentalistic explanations. This shows that stimulus characteristics (such as LMs) as well as inter-individual differences influence whether mentalizing is required and applied to processing humor, and that empathizing and systemizing influence humor appreciation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Oliver Double and Sharon Lockyer (Eds.): Alternative comedy now and then: critical perspectives Frontmatter From humor to political dispositions: effect of disparagement humor on perceptions of political identity Humor as a source for collaborative storytelling: perspectives on dynamic and static stories Animated satire and collective memory: reflecting on the American “history wars” with The Simpsons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1