基于S-G滤波理论的定量超声造影诊断肾移植慢性排斥反应的价值

Zhijin Zhao, Ping Yang, Z. Ji, Wan-yuan He
{"title":"基于S-G滤波理论的定量超声造影诊断肾移植慢性排斥反应的价值","authors":"Zhijin Zhao, Ping Yang, Z. Ji, Wan-yuan He","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the characteristics and differences of micro-perfusion between patients after transplant kidney with stable renal function, acute rejection and chronic rejection by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantifying. \n \n \nMethods \nThirty-three patients with stable renal function, 27 patients with acute rejection and 14 patients with chronic rejection were enrolled. The perfusion parameters of region of interest in renal cortex and medulla were obtained by CEUS offline data quantitative analysis software. The perfusion parameters in stable renal function group were compared with those in acute rejection and chronic rejection groups; furthermore, the value of color Doppler and CEUS in the diagnosis of chronic rejection was explored and compared. \n \n \nResults \nAs for resistance index RI on color Doppler, it made no statistical difference among three groups (P>0.05). The perfusion parameters derived from CEUS quantitative analysis and Color Doppler parameter resistance index (RI) were not statistically different among renal function stabilization, acute rejection and chronic rejection groups (P>0.05); as compared with stable renal function group, there were marked reductions in peak intensity of cortex (PIc), peak intensity of medulla (PIm), ascending slope of cortex (a3c), ascending slope of medulla (a3m) and area under the curve of cortex (AUCc) in chronic rejection group. And mean transit time of cortex (MTTc) and mean transit time of medulla (MTTm) became significantly prolonged (P<0.05). Except for a3m, PIc and PIm were not significantly different between stable renal function and acute rejection groups (P<0.05). As compared with acute rejection group, MTTc and MTTm were significantly prolonged in chronic rejection group while AUCm and PIm declined markedly (P<0.05). When PIm<26.7dB, the diagnostic efficiency of chronic rejection was the highest and the sensitivity and specificity were 85.7% and 72.7% respectively. \n \n \nConclusions \nAs compared with color Doppler, CEUS quantitative parameters based on S-G filter theory can evaluate the micro-perfusion of transplant kidney more precisely and may provide diagnostic clue for chronic rejection. \n \n \nKey words: \nKidney transplantation; Ultrasound contrast; Rejection","PeriodicalId":9885,"journal":{"name":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","volume":"13 1","pages":"215-218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value of quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound based on S-G filter theory in the diagnosis of chronic rejection of transplant kidney\",\"authors\":\"Zhijin Zhao, Ping Yang, Z. Ji, Wan-yuan He\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.04.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo explore the characteristics and differences of micro-perfusion between patients after transplant kidney with stable renal function, acute rejection and chronic rejection by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantifying. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThirty-three patients with stable renal function, 27 patients with acute rejection and 14 patients with chronic rejection were enrolled. The perfusion parameters of region of interest in renal cortex and medulla were obtained by CEUS offline data quantitative analysis software. The perfusion parameters in stable renal function group were compared with those in acute rejection and chronic rejection groups; furthermore, the value of color Doppler and CEUS in the diagnosis of chronic rejection was explored and compared. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAs for resistance index RI on color Doppler, it made no statistical difference among three groups (P>0.05). The perfusion parameters derived from CEUS quantitative analysis and Color Doppler parameter resistance index (RI) were not statistically different among renal function stabilization, acute rejection and chronic rejection groups (P>0.05); as compared with stable renal function group, there were marked reductions in peak intensity of cortex (PIc), peak intensity of medulla (PIm), ascending slope of cortex (a3c), ascending slope of medulla (a3m) and area under the curve of cortex (AUCc) in chronic rejection group. And mean transit time of cortex (MTTc) and mean transit time of medulla (MTTm) became significantly prolonged (P<0.05). Except for a3m, PIc and PIm were not significantly different between stable renal function and acute rejection groups (P<0.05). As compared with acute rejection group, MTTc and MTTm were significantly prolonged in chronic rejection group while AUCm and PIm declined markedly (P<0.05). When PIm<26.7dB, the diagnostic efficiency of chronic rejection was the highest and the sensitivity and specificity were 85.7% and 72.7% respectively. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nAs compared with color Doppler, CEUS quantitative parameters based on S-G filter theory can evaluate the micro-perfusion of transplant kidney more precisely and may provide diagnostic clue for chronic rejection. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nKidney transplantation; Ultrasound contrast; Rejection\",\"PeriodicalId\":9885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"215-218\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.04.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chineae Journal of Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1785.2019.04.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过超声造影(CEUS)定量分析肾移植术后肾功能稳定、急性排斥反应和慢性排斥反应患者的微灌注特征及差异。方法选择肾功能稳定患者33例,急性排斥反应患者27例,慢性排斥反应患者14例。采用超声造影离线数据定量分析软件获取肾皮质、髓质感兴趣区灌注参数。比较肾功能稳定组与急性排斥反应组和慢性排斥反应组的灌注参数;进一步探讨彩色多普勒超声与超声造影对慢性排斥反应的诊断价值。结果三组患者彩色多普勒阻力指数RI比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。肾功能稳定组、急性排斥组、慢性排斥组灌注参数及彩色多普勒参数阻力指数(RI)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);与肾功能稳定组比较,慢性排斥组皮质峰值强度(PIc)、髓质峰值强度(PIm)、皮质上升斜率(a3c)、髓质上升斜率(a3m)和皮质曲线下面积(AUCc)均明显降低。皮层平均传递时间(MTTc)和髓质平均传递时间(MTTm)显著延长(P<0.05)。除a3m外,PIc和PIm在稳定肾功能组和急性排斥反应组间无显著差异(P<0.05)。与急性排斥组比较,慢性排斥组MTTc、MTTm显著延长,AUCm、PIm显著降低(P<0.05)。当PIm<26.7dB时,诊断慢性排斥反应的效率最高,敏感性和特异性分别为85.7%和72.7%。结论与彩色多普勒相比,基于S-G滤波理论的超声造影定量参数能更准确地评价移植肾的微灌注情况,为慢性排斥反应提供诊断线索。关键词:肾移植;超声对比;拒绝
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Value of quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound based on S-G filter theory in the diagnosis of chronic rejection of transplant kidney
Objective To explore the characteristics and differences of micro-perfusion between patients after transplant kidney with stable renal function, acute rejection and chronic rejection by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantifying. Methods Thirty-three patients with stable renal function, 27 patients with acute rejection and 14 patients with chronic rejection were enrolled. The perfusion parameters of region of interest in renal cortex and medulla were obtained by CEUS offline data quantitative analysis software. The perfusion parameters in stable renal function group were compared with those in acute rejection and chronic rejection groups; furthermore, the value of color Doppler and CEUS in the diagnosis of chronic rejection was explored and compared. Results As for resistance index RI on color Doppler, it made no statistical difference among three groups (P>0.05). The perfusion parameters derived from CEUS quantitative analysis and Color Doppler parameter resistance index (RI) were not statistically different among renal function stabilization, acute rejection and chronic rejection groups (P>0.05); as compared with stable renal function group, there were marked reductions in peak intensity of cortex (PIc), peak intensity of medulla (PIm), ascending slope of cortex (a3c), ascending slope of medulla (a3m) and area under the curve of cortex (AUCc) in chronic rejection group. And mean transit time of cortex (MTTc) and mean transit time of medulla (MTTm) became significantly prolonged (P<0.05). Except for a3m, PIc and PIm were not significantly different between stable renal function and acute rejection groups (P<0.05). As compared with acute rejection group, MTTc and MTTm were significantly prolonged in chronic rejection group while AUCm and PIm declined markedly (P<0.05). When PIm<26.7dB, the diagnostic efficiency of chronic rejection was the highest and the sensitivity and specificity were 85.7% and 72.7% respectively. Conclusions As compared with color Doppler, CEUS quantitative parameters based on S-G filter theory can evaluate the micro-perfusion of transplant kidney more precisely and may provide diagnostic clue for chronic rejection. Key words: Kidney transplantation; Ultrasound contrast; Rejection
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison the Diagnostic Value of Doppler Ultrasonography to Biopsy, in Evaluation of Post-transplant Complications and Kidney Function Overview of global organ donation and transplantation in 2020 Development and prospect of clinical research on lung transplantation in post-COVID-19 era. Risk assessment of organ donation and procurement during COVID-19 epidemic Clinical analysis of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on one case with living-related kidney transplantation/ 中华器官移植杂志
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1