Bamanga Abdularazaq, U. Abdulrahman, M. Mohammed, Musa Hassan, Mohammed Ibrahim, Imam Zayyad
{"title":"阿达马瓦州约拉三级医院个人防护服的质量保证","authors":"Bamanga Abdularazaq, U. Abdulrahman, M. Mohammed, Musa Hassan, Mohammed Ibrahim, Imam Zayyad","doi":"10.48153/jrrs/2022/zjyw8662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Exposure to ionizing radiation is hazardous to radiological workers, patient's relatives, and patients. The effect may be stochastic or deterministic. Protective apparel keeps the radiation dose received by hospital workers, patients and patient relatives as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) under normal working conditions. Protective apparel is frequently mishandled in the diagnostic room after use leading to damage. Objective: This study aimed at assessing the integrity of the protective apparel used at the radiology department of a tertiary health institution in Adamawa State of Nigeria. Methods: From three different hospitals in Yola, 26 pieces of protective apparel were identified, inspected and classified by the hospital, type, manufacturer's name, years it had been used, and the thickness of the lead. With a 17 x 14-inch cassette two exposures were made on each garment with 70 kVp and 10 mAs with a focal film distance (FFD) of 100cm with a conventional x-ray unit. Results: The result showed 12 (46.0 %) of the protective apparel studied were defective with split 5 (42.0%), crack 4(33.0%) and hole 3(25.0%) as the most common defect. The correlation between the apparels age and the number of defective protective apparel were statistically not significant (p = 0.166). Conclusion: In order to ensure protective garments provide the best protection possible; there is a need for proper storage and regular quality assurance on the apparel in the radiology departments to ensure radiation protection.","PeriodicalId":16919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences","volume":"194 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"QUALITY ASSURANCE OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE APPAREL AT TERTIARY HOSPITALS IN YOLA, ADAMAWA STATE\",\"authors\":\"Bamanga Abdularazaq, U. Abdulrahman, M. Mohammed, Musa Hassan, Mohammed Ibrahim, Imam Zayyad\",\"doi\":\"10.48153/jrrs/2022/zjyw8662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Exposure to ionizing radiation is hazardous to radiological workers, patient's relatives, and patients. The effect may be stochastic or deterministic. Protective apparel keeps the radiation dose received by hospital workers, patients and patient relatives as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) under normal working conditions. Protective apparel is frequently mishandled in the diagnostic room after use leading to damage. Objective: This study aimed at assessing the integrity of the protective apparel used at the radiology department of a tertiary health institution in Adamawa State of Nigeria. Methods: From three different hospitals in Yola, 26 pieces of protective apparel were identified, inspected and classified by the hospital, type, manufacturer's name, years it had been used, and the thickness of the lead. With a 17 x 14-inch cassette two exposures were made on each garment with 70 kVp and 10 mAs with a focal film distance (FFD) of 100cm with a conventional x-ray unit. Results: The result showed 12 (46.0 %) of the protective apparel studied were defective with split 5 (42.0%), crack 4(33.0%) and hole 3(25.0%) as the most common defect. The correlation between the apparels age and the number of defective protective apparel were statistically not significant (p = 0.166). Conclusion: In order to ensure protective garments provide the best protection possible; there is a need for proper storage and regular quality assurance on the apparel in the radiology departments to ensure radiation protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":\"194 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48153/jrrs/2022/zjyw8662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiography and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48153/jrrs/2022/zjyw8662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:暴露于电离辐射对放射工作人员、病人家属和病人都是危险的。这种影响可能是随机的,也可能是确定的。防护服使医院工作人员、病人和病人家属在正常工作条件下接受的辐射剂量尽可能低(ALARA)。防护服使用后在诊疗室经常处理不当导致损坏。目的:本研究旨在评估尼日利亚阿达马瓦州一家三级卫生机构放射科使用的防护服的完整性。方法:对约拉市3家不同医院的26件防护服进行鉴定、检验,按医院、型号、厂家名称、使用年限、铅条厚度等进行分类。使用17 x 14英寸的卡带,在每件衣服上以70 kVp和10 ma进行两次曝光,使用常规x射线装置,焦膜距离(FFD)为100cm。结果:防护服缺陷12件(46.0%),其中5号裂口(42.0%)、4号裂口(33.0%)和3号裂口(25.0%)最为常见。服装使用年限与防护服次品数量的相关性无统计学意义(p = 0.166)。结论:为了确保防护服提供最好的保护;放射科的服装需要适当的储存和定期的质量保证,以确保防辐射。
QUALITY ASSURANCE OF PERSONAL PROTECTIVE APPAREL AT TERTIARY HOSPITALS IN YOLA, ADAMAWA STATE
Background: Exposure to ionizing radiation is hazardous to radiological workers, patient's relatives, and patients. The effect may be stochastic or deterministic. Protective apparel keeps the radiation dose received by hospital workers, patients and patient relatives as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) under normal working conditions. Protective apparel is frequently mishandled in the diagnostic room after use leading to damage. Objective: This study aimed at assessing the integrity of the protective apparel used at the radiology department of a tertiary health institution in Adamawa State of Nigeria. Methods: From three different hospitals in Yola, 26 pieces of protective apparel were identified, inspected and classified by the hospital, type, manufacturer's name, years it had been used, and the thickness of the lead. With a 17 x 14-inch cassette two exposures were made on each garment with 70 kVp and 10 mAs with a focal film distance (FFD) of 100cm with a conventional x-ray unit. Results: The result showed 12 (46.0 %) of the protective apparel studied were defective with split 5 (42.0%), crack 4(33.0%) and hole 3(25.0%) as the most common defect. The correlation between the apparels age and the number of defective protective apparel were statistically not significant (p = 0.166). Conclusion: In order to ensure protective garments provide the best protection possible; there is a need for proper storage and regular quality assurance on the apparel in the radiology departments to ensure radiation protection.