腹腔镜胆囊切除术后增强恢复:单中心体验

Xin Chen, Chen Wang, Shizeng Li, Bin Xia, Wenhui Wu, Zhiwei Yu, Mingzhe Li
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊切除术后增强恢复:单中心体验","authors":"Xin Chen, Chen Wang, Shizeng Li, Bin Xia, Wenhui Wu, Zhiwei Yu, Mingzhe Li","doi":"10.6913/mrhk.050103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:The role of Eintraoperative joint organ removal or transit abdominal surgery recovery after surgery (ERAS) in reducing hospital stay time and perioperative hospitalization costs have been proven. However, most studies have been carried out in areas rich in medical resources. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of ERAS compared with traditional perioperative period care for laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) in areas poor in medical resources in China. Methods:A randomized controlled trial on laparoscopic cholecystectomy was conducted at The People's Hospital ofFengqing from July 2020 to March 2021. Patients were randomly divided into an ERAS group and a traditional care group. The main outcome was the length of hospital stay after surgery. The secondary outcomes included hospitalization costs and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for postoperative pain, first exhaust time, and first semi-liquid diet time after surgery. The ERAS group was provided with perioperative education, nutritional support, preoperative 2 h oral carbohydrates, restricted rehydration, intraoperative insulation, no drainage tubes, wound hemp, early mobilization postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prevention and multi-modal analgesia, early activity. Results: The study was conducted on a total of 140 patients with 70 patients each in the ERAS group and traditional care groups. In the ERAS group, Thelength of hospital stay after surgery was shorter (4.06 vs.4.61 days, P<0.05), the average hospitalization cost (CNY 7900 vs. 8470, P<0.05),and VAS score (3.10 vs. 3.57 points, compared to the eraser group P<0.001) was lower, the first exhaust time was shorter (12.2 vs. 14.2 hours, P<0.001),thefirst semi-liquid diet time after surgery was shorter(14.5 vs. 16.8 hours, P<0.001), and the incidence of major postoperative complications was lower (bile leakage, postoperative bleeding, bile duct damage) (0% vs. 12.9%, P<0.05). No significant difference in surgery time (57.8 vs. 54.6 min, P>0.05) was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: Even in areas poor in medical resources in China, the use of the ERAS concept for LC surgery can reduce the length of hospital stay, cut down the cost of hospitalization, and lessen the pain of patients after surgery and accelerate postoperative recovery.","PeriodicalId":50132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A single-center experience\",\"authors\":\"Xin Chen, Chen Wang, Shizeng Li, Bin Xia, Wenhui Wu, Zhiwei Yu, Mingzhe Li\",\"doi\":\"10.6913/mrhk.050103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective:The role of Eintraoperative joint organ removal or transit abdominal surgery recovery after surgery (ERAS) in reducing hospital stay time and perioperative hospitalization costs have been proven. However, most studies have been carried out in areas rich in medical resources. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of ERAS compared with traditional perioperative period care for laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) in areas poor in medical resources in China. Methods:A randomized controlled trial on laparoscopic cholecystectomy was conducted at The People's Hospital ofFengqing from July 2020 to March 2021. Patients were randomly divided into an ERAS group and a traditional care group. The main outcome was the length of hospital stay after surgery. The secondary outcomes included hospitalization costs and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for postoperative pain, first exhaust time, and first semi-liquid diet time after surgery. The ERAS group was provided with perioperative education, nutritional support, preoperative 2 h oral carbohydrates, restricted rehydration, intraoperative insulation, no drainage tubes, wound hemp, early mobilization postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prevention and multi-modal analgesia, early activity. Results: The study was conducted on a total of 140 patients with 70 patients each in the ERAS group and traditional care groups. In the ERAS group, Thelength of hospital stay after surgery was shorter (4.06 vs.4.61 days, P<0.05), the average hospitalization cost (CNY 7900 vs. 8470, P<0.05),and VAS score (3.10 vs. 3.57 points, compared to the eraser group P<0.001) was lower, the first exhaust time was shorter (12.2 vs. 14.2 hours, P<0.001),thefirst semi-liquid diet time after surgery was shorter(14.5 vs. 16.8 hours, P<0.001), and the incidence of major postoperative complications was lower (bile leakage, postoperative bleeding, bile duct damage) (0% vs. 12.9%, P<0.05). No significant difference in surgery time (57.8 vs. 54.6 min, P>0.05) was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: Even in areas poor in medical resources in China, the use of the ERAS concept for LC surgery can reduce the length of hospital stay, cut down the cost of hospitalization, and lessen the pain of patients after surgery and accelerate postoperative recovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6913/mrhk.050103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6913/mrhk.050103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:证实术中关节器官摘除或中转腹部手术术后恢复(ERAS)在减少住院时间和围手术期住院费用方面的作用。然而,大多数研究都是在医疗资源丰富的地区进行的。在本研究中,我们比较了在中国医疗资源贫乏地区腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中ERAS与传统围手术期护理的安全性和有效性。方法:于2020年7月至2021年3月在重庆市人民医院进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机对照试验。患者随机分为ERAS组和传统护理组。主要观察指标为术后住院时间。次要结局包括住院费用和术后疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、术后第一次排气时间和第一次半流质饮食时间。ERAS组围手术期教育、营养支持、术前2 h口服碳水化合物、限制性补液、术中保温、无引流管、创面麻、早期活动、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)预防及多模式镇痛、早期活动。结果:本研究共纳入140例患者,ERAS组和传统护理组各70例。ERAS组术后住院时间较ERAS组短(4.06 vs.4.61 d, P0.05)。结论:即使在中国医疗资源贫乏的地区,应用ERAS理念进行LC手术也可以缩短患者的住院时间,降低住院费用,减轻患者术后疼痛,加快术后恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhanced recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A single-center experience
Objective:The role of Eintraoperative joint organ removal or transit abdominal surgery recovery after surgery (ERAS) in reducing hospital stay time and perioperative hospitalization costs have been proven. However, most studies have been carried out in areas rich in medical resources. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of ERAS compared with traditional perioperative period care for laparoscopic cholecystectomy(LC) in areas poor in medical resources in China. Methods:A randomized controlled trial on laparoscopic cholecystectomy was conducted at The People's Hospital ofFengqing from July 2020 to March 2021. Patients were randomly divided into an ERAS group and a traditional care group. The main outcome was the length of hospital stay after surgery. The secondary outcomes included hospitalization costs and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for postoperative pain, first exhaust time, and first semi-liquid diet time after surgery. The ERAS group was provided with perioperative education, nutritional support, preoperative 2 h oral carbohydrates, restricted rehydration, intraoperative insulation, no drainage tubes, wound hemp, early mobilization postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prevention and multi-modal analgesia, early activity. Results: The study was conducted on a total of 140 patients with 70 patients each in the ERAS group and traditional care groups. In the ERAS group, Thelength of hospital stay after surgery was shorter (4.06 vs.4.61 days, P<0.05), the average hospitalization cost (CNY 7900 vs. 8470, P<0.05),and VAS score (3.10 vs. 3.57 points, compared to the eraser group P<0.001) was lower, the first exhaust time was shorter (12.2 vs. 14.2 hours, P<0.001),thefirst semi-liquid diet time after surgery was shorter(14.5 vs. 16.8 hours, P<0.001), and the incidence of major postoperative complications was lower (bile leakage, postoperative bleeding, bile duct damage) (0% vs. 12.9%, P<0.05). No significant difference in surgery time (57.8 vs. 54.6 min, P>0.05) was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: Even in areas poor in medical resources in China, the use of the ERAS concept for LC surgery can reduce the length of hospital stay, cut down the cost of hospitalization, and lessen the pain of patients after surgery and accelerate postoperative recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing Influenza Vaccine Adherence Among Pregnant Women: A Health Center-Based Study in Qatar Micronodular thymic carcinoma with lymphoid hyperplasia : A case report and review of the literature Long-term Clean Intermittent Catheterization Users’ Experience and Practical Barriers: A Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis Whether serum albumin/leukocyte ratio combined with Go-FAR score more accurately predicts the neurological outcome of patients who suffered cardiac arrest Creation of a oblique colon valve: a new methods to wake up the stem cell of colon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1