西藏贡嘎山地区两种不同森林类型的降雨截流

Gang-cai Liu, S. Du, Si-li Peng, Genxu Wang
{"title":"西藏贡嘎山地区两种不同森林类型的降雨截流","authors":"Gang-cai Liu, S. Du, Si-li Peng, Genxu Wang","doi":"10.4172/2157-7587.1000161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An important component of the water cycle in ecological systems, rainfall interception by virgin forests was here calculated from gross precipitation minus through fall and stem flow. The through fall measurement system was designed on the basis of a 3 m long trough mounted beneath the canopy and able to operate successfully under a range of rainfall conditions. Stem flow was measured using spiral collars consisting of a split plastic hose attached to sampled trees, with gross precipitation measured in an open area via a tipping-bucket rain gauge. This study was carried out to evaluate rainfall interception and distribution patterns of gross precipitation in two contrasting rainforest types (coniferous and broadleaved/coniferous mixed) in the Mount Gongga area on the eastern fringe of Tibet, China, from 2008 to 2009. Net precipitation was found to be primarily composed of through fall, while stem flow contributed less than 0.5% (0.1% and 0.4% in conifer and mixed forest, respectively) to total gross precipitation (GP) and was thus negligible in both forest types. The difference in the interception loss fraction between conifer and mixed forest was greater than 30%, with the interception loss of the former apparently more than that of the latter mainly due to the increased presence of small droplets produced by coniferous leaves. Additionally, interception loss in conifer forest was more dependent on rainfall than that in mixed forest. In contrast, through fall and stem flow exhibited the opposite pattern, likely attributable to a through fall lag of 8 to 10 h after rainfall in mixed forest but not in conifer forest.","PeriodicalId":17605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Waste Water Treatment and Analysis","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rainfall Interception in Two Contrasting Forest Types in the Mount Gongga Area of Eastern Tibet, China\",\"authors\":\"Gang-cai Liu, S. Du, Si-li Peng, Genxu Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2157-7587.1000161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An important component of the water cycle in ecological systems, rainfall interception by virgin forests was here calculated from gross precipitation minus through fall and stem flow. The through fall measurement system was designed on the basis of a 3 m long trough mounted beneath the canopy and able to operate successfully under a range of rainfall conditions. Stem flow was measured using spiral collars consisting of a split plastic hose attached to sampled trees, with gross precipitation measured in an open area via a tipping-bucket rain gauge. This study was carried out to evaluate rainfall interception and distribution patterns of gross precipitation in two contrasting rainforest types (coniferous and broadleaved/coniferous mixed) in the Mount Gongga area on the eastern fringe of Tibet, China, from 2008 to 2009. Net precipitation was found to be primarily composed of through fall, while stem flow contributed less than 0.5% (0.1% and 0.4% in conifer and mixed forest, respectively) to total gross precipitation (GP) and was thus negligible in both forest types. The difference in the interception loss fraction between conifer and mixed forest was greater than 30%, with the interception loss of the former apparently more than that of the latter mainly due to the increased presence of small droplets produced by coniferous leaves. Additionally, interception loss in conifer forest was more dependent on rainfall than that in mixed forest. In contrast, through fall and stem flow exhibited the opposite pattern, likely attributable to a through fall lag of 8 to 10 h after rainfall in mixed forest but not in conifer forest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17605,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Waste Water Treatment and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Waste Water Treatment and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7587.1000161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Waste Water Treatment and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7587.1000161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

作为生态系统中水循环的一个重要组成部分,原始森林的降雨量拦截在这里是通过总降水量减去秋流和茎流来计算的。落差测量系统的设计基于一个3米长的槽,安装在雨篷下方,能够在一系列降雨条件下成功运行。茎流测量使用螺旋环组成的分裂塑料软管连接到采样树,总降水测量在开放区域通过翻斗雨量计。研究了西藏东缘贡嘎山两种不同雨林类型(针叶雨林和阔叶/针叶混合雨林)2008 - 2009年的降水截留及总降水分布特征。净降水主要由秋雨组成,而茎流对总降水(GP)的贡献小于0.5%(针叶林和混交林分别为0.1%和0.4%),因此在两种林型中都可以忽略不计。针叶林与混交林的截留损失比差异大于30%,针叶林的截留损失明显大于混交林,这主要是由于针叶林叶片产生的小液滴增多所致。此外,与混交林相比,针叶林的截流损失更依赖于降雨。相反,透秋和茎流表现出相反的模式,可能是由于混交林在降雨后有8 ~ 10 h的透秋滞后,而针叶林则没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rainfall Interception in Two Contrasting Forest Types in the Mount Gongga Area of Eastern Tibet, China
An important component of the water cycle in ecological systems, rainfall interception by virgin forests was here calculated from gross precipitation minus through fall and stem flow. The through fall measurement system was designed on the basis of a 3 m long trough mounted beneath the canopy and able to operate successfully under a range of rainfall conditions. Stem flow was measured using spiral collars consisting of a split plastic hose attached to sampled trees, with gross precipitation measured in an open area via a tipping-bucket rain gauge. This study was carried out to evaluate rainfall interception and distribution patterns of gross precipitation in two contrasting rainforest types (coniferous and broadleaved/coniferous mixed) in the Mount Gongga area on the eastern fringe of Tibet, China, from 2008 to 2009. Net precipitation was found to be primarily composed of through fall, while stem flow contributed less than 0.5% (0.1% and 0.4% in conifer and mixed forest, respectively) to total gross precipitation (GP) and was thus negligible in both forest types. The difference in the interception loss fraction between conifer and mixed forest was greater than 30%, with the interception loss of the former apparently more than that of the latter mainly due to the increased presence of small droplets produced by coniferous leaves. Additionally, interception loss in conifer forest was more dependent on rainfall than that in mixed forest. In contrast, through fall and stem flow exhibited the opposite pattern, likely attributable to a through fall lag of 8 to 10 h after rainfall in mixed forest but not in conifer forest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Seasonal Variation of Water Quality Parameters of Zobe ReservoirDutsinma Katsina State, Nigeria Challenges of Water Resources in Iraq Similitude in Archaeology: Examining Agricultural System Science in PreColumbian Civilizations of Ancient Peru and Bolivia Land Use Change at Sub-Watershed Level Evaluation of Locally Available Energy Source Feeds on Fattening Performance of Local Oxen and Carcass Analysis in Wolaita, Southern Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1