在索马里建立复原力;来自实地数据收集的证据

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Development Effectiveness Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1080/19439342.2020.1840421
Anil Kumar Malik, M. d’Errico, D. Omolo, Benjamin Gichane
{"title":"在索马里建立复原力;来自实地数据收集的证据","authors":"Anil Kumar Malik, M. d’Errico, D. Omolo, Benjamin Gichane","doi":"10.1080/19439342.2020.1840421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Resilience enhancing programmes are key to supporting people facing natural and man-induced shocks. International agencies, donors, NGOs, and governments adopted resilience as a framework for designing interventions. However, there is little evidence of the impact of these programs, especially in a fragile context. This paper evaluates the impact of a joint strategy in Somalia. Results show a positive and significant effect on a resilience construct. This paper contributes also to the literature of impact evaluation by using quasi-experimental (but solid) evidence, and by showing the effect of integrated assistance. This finding suggests investing in a diversified approach to enhance resilience.","PeriodicalId":46384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","volume":"29 2 1","pages":"323 - 340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building resilience in Somalia; evidence from field data collection\",\"authors\":\"Anil Kumar Malik, M. d’Errico, D. Omolo, Benjamin Gichane\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19439342.2020.1840421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Resilience enhancing programmes are key to supporting people facing natural and man-induced shocks. International agencies, donors, NGOs, and governments adopted resilience as a framework for designing interventions. However, there is little evidence of the impact of these programs, especially in a fragile context. This paper evaluates the impact of a joint strategy in Somalia. Results show a positive and significant effect on a resilience construct. This paper contributes also to the literature of impact evaluation by using quasi-experimental (but solid) evidence, and by showing the effect of integrated assistance. This finding suggests investing in a diversified approach to enhance resilience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Development Effectiveness\",\"volume\":\"29 2 1\",\"pages\":\"323 - 340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Development Effectiveness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2020.1840421\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2020.1840421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

增强韧性计划是支持面临自然和人为冲击的人们的关键。国际机构、捐助者、非政府组织和各国政府都将恢复力作为设计干预措施的框架。然而,几乎没有证据表明这些计划的影响,特别是在脆弱的背景下。本文评估了索马里联合战略的影响。结果显示,心理弹性对心理弹性构念有显著的正向影响。本文还通过使用准实验(但可靠)证据和展示综合援助的效果来贡献影响评估的文献。这一发现表明,投资于多样化的方式来增强韧性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Building resilience in Somalia; evidence from field data collection
ABSTRACT Resilience enhancing programmes are key to supporting people facing natural and man-induced shocks. International agencies, donors, NGOs, and governments adopted resilience as a framework for designing interventions. However, there is little evidence of the impact of these programs, especially in a fragile context. This paper evaluates the impact of a joint strategy in Somalia. Results show a positive and significant effect on a resilience construct. This paper contributes also to the literature of impact evaluation by using quasi-experimental (but solid) evidence, and by showing the effect of integrated assistance. This finding suggests investing in a diversified approach to enhance resilience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Does the small business programme benefit self-employed workers? Evidence from Nicaragua Grow the pie, or have it? Using machine learning to impact heterogeneity in the Ultra-poor graduation model How do patent subsidies drive SMEs to patent? Evidence from China Impact of cash transfer on food accessibility and calorie-intake in Pakistan Self-selection versus population-based sampling for evaluation of an agronomy training program in Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1