社区和医院获得性尿路感染的细菌演变墨西哥的一个案例

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Primary Health Care Research and Development Pub Date : 2019-12-23 DOI:10.15761/hpc.1000178
H. D. Salazar-Holguín, E. P. Salazar-Fernandez
{"title":"社区和医院获得性尿路感染的细菌演变墨西哥的一个案例","authors":"H. D. Salazar-Holguín, E. P. Salazar-Fernandez","doi":"10.15761/hpc.1000178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Since “nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution” (Dobzhansky T) and it develops through the interrelationships between living beings and their environment; the biological factors in the etiology of human infections can only be explained based on Darwin’s evolutionary theory. In this sense, environment as different as communities and hospitals originate diverse evolutionary processes in the causal agents of community and nosocomial infections; mainly in the development of resistance to antimicrobials. Methods: To validate the possible significant qualitative and quantitative differences between the causal agents of nosocomial and community-acquired urinary tract infections, and their respective antimicrobial resistances; a clinical-epidemiological, descriptive, transversal, comparative and retrospective study was conducted; based on every urine culture and antibiogram performed during a one-year period in a family medicine unit and a regional general hospital in Chihuahua, Mexico. For verification of the statistical significance of these differences, χ2, odds ratio, confidence interval and p-value were calculated with a 95% reliability limits for all cases. Results: Qualitative differences (genera, species and strains) were verified between the 27 causal agents of nosocomial and community urinary tract infections; with the most evolved bacteria and yeasts located in the hospital, having a 1.9 times higher resistance against almost every antibiotic, especially for Gram-negative bacteria and Escherichia coli. In all cases, these differences were statistically significant. For Gram-positive bacteria, less resistant in general, community strains had a 1.2 times higher resistance for two of four types of antimicrobials; but not significantly. Conclusion: Regarding antimicrobial sensitivity, important differences were evidenced as for the clinical practice guides recommendations; based on research from environments, societies and medical attention quite different from Mexico. Even if bacterial evolutionary processes and antibiotic resistance are global, they do not run in parallel nor are contemporary everywhere; and although similarities eventually prevail, they occur with local peculiarities; therefore, their consideration is decisive for a suitable and effective prevention and therapy of infectious diseases and their epidemic outbreaks.","PeriodicalId":48703,"journal":{"name":"Primary Health Care Research and Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bacterial evolution of urinary tract infections acquired in the community and in the hospital. A case of Mexico\",\"authors\":\"H. D. Salazar-Holguín, E. P. Salazar-Fernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.15761/hpc.1000178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Since “nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution” (Dobzhansky T) and it develops through the interrelationships between living beings and their environment; the biological factors in the etiology of human infections can only be explained based on Darwin’s evolutionary theory. In this sense, environment as different as communities and hospitals originate diverse evolutionary processes in the causal agents of community and nosocomial infections; mainly in the development of resistance to antimicrobials. Methods: To validate the possible significant qualitative and quantitative differences between the causal agents of nosocomial and community-acquired urinary tract infections, and their respective antimicrobial resistances; a clinical-epidemiological, descriptive, transversal, comparative and retrospective study was conducted; based on every urine culture and antibiogram performed during a one-year period in a family medicine unit and a regional general hospital in Chihuahua, Mexico. For verification of the statistical significance of these differences, χ2, odds ratio, confidence interval and p-value were calculated with a 95% reliability limits for all cases. Results: Qualitative differences (genera, species and strains) were verified between the 27 causal agents of nosocomial and community urinary tract infections; with the most evolved bacteria and yeasts located in the hospital, having a 1.9 times higher resistance against almost every antibiotic, especially for Gram-negative bacteria and Escherichia coli. In all cases, these differences were statistically significant. For Gram-positive bacteria, less resistant in general, community strains had a 1.2 times higher resistance for two of four types of antimicrobials; but not significantly. Conclusion: Regarding antimicrobial sensitivity, important differences were evidenced as for the clinical practice guides recommendations; based on research from environments, societies and medical attention quite different from Mexico. Even if bacterial evolutionary processes and antibiotic resistance are global, they do not run in parallel nor are contemporary everywhere; and although similarities eventually prevail, they occur with local peculiarities; therefore, their consideration is decisive for a suitable and effective prevention and therapy of infectious diseases and their epidemic outbreaks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary Health Care Research and Development\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary Health Care Research and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15761/hpc.1000178\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Health Care Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/hpc.1000178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:由于“生物学中没有什么是有意义的,除非在进化的光”(Dobzhansky T),它是通过生物与其环境之间的相互关系发展起来的;人类感染病因学中的生物学因素只能根据达尔文的进化论来解释。从这个意义上说,社区和医院等不同的环境在社区和医院感染的致病因子中产生了不同的进化过程;主要是对抗菌素产生耐药性。方法:验证医院获得性尿路感染与社区获得性尿路感染的致因及其各自的耐药性是否存在显著的定性和定量差异;进行了临床流行病学、描述性、横向、比较和回顾性研究;基于在墨西哥奇瓦瓦州的一家家庭医学单位和一家地区综合医院进行的一年期间的每一次尿液培养和抗生素谱。为了验证这些差异的统计学意义,对所有病例计算χ2、优势比、置信区间和p值,信度限为95%。结果:验证了27种医院和社区尿路感染病原菌的属、种、株的定性差异;其中进化程度最高的细菌和酵母菌位于医院,对几乎所有抗生素的耐药性都高出1.9倍,尤其是对革兰氏阴性菌和大肠杆菌。在所有情况下,这些差异在统计学上都是显著的。对于一般耐药性较低的革兰氏阳性细菌,社区菌株对四种抗菌素中的两种的耐药性高出1.2倍;但并不显著。结论:在抗菌药物敏感性方面,临床实践指南建议存在重要差异;基于环境、社会和医疗方面的研究,这与墨西哥截然不同。即使细菌进化过程和抗生素耐药性是全球性的,它们也不是并行运行的,也不是在所有地方都是同时代的;尽管相似之处最终占据了上风,但它们与当地的特殊性一起出现;因此,它们的考虑对传染病及其流行的适当和有效的预防和治疗具有决定性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bacterial evolution of urinary tract infections acquired in the community and in the hospital. A case of Mexico
Introduction: Since “nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution” (Dobzhansky T) and it develops through the interrelationships between living beings and their environment; the biological factors in the etiology of human infections can only be explained based on Darwin’s evolutionary theory. In this sense, environment as different as communities and hospitals originate diverse evolutionary processes in the causal agents of community and nosocomial infections; mainly in the development of resistance to antimicrobials. Methods: To validate the possible significant qualitative and quantitative differences between the causal agents of nosocomial and community-acquired urinary tract infections, and their respective antimicrobial resistances; a clinical-epidemiological, descriptive, transversal, comparative and retrospective study was conducted; based on every urine culture and antibiogram performed during a one-year period in a family medicine unit and a regional general hospital in Chihuahua, Mexico. For verification of the statistical significance of these differences, χ2, odds ratio, confidence interval and p-value were calculated with a 95% reliability limits for all cases. Results: Qualitative differences (genera, species and strains) were verified between the 27 causal agents of nosocomial and community urinary tract infections; with the most evolved bacteria and yeasts located in the hospital, having a 1.9 times higher resistance against almost every antibiotic, especially for Gram-negative bacteria and Escherichia coli. In all cases, these differences were statistically significant. For Gram-positive bacteria, less resistant in general, community strains had a 1.2 times higher resistance for two of four types of antimicrobials; but not significantly. Conclusion: Regarding antimicrobial sensitivity, important differences were evidenced as for the clinical practice guides recommendations; based on research from environments, societies and medical attention quite different from Mexico. Even if bacterial evolutionary processes and antibiotic resistance are global, they do not run in parallel nor are contemporary everywhere; and although similarities eventually prevail, they occur with local peculiarities; therefore, their consideration is decisive for a suitable and effective prevention and therapy of infectious diseases and their epidemic outbreaks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
119
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊介绍: Primary Health Care Research & Development is aimed specifically at both researchers and practitioners in primary health care, bridging the gap between the two areas. It provides a forum for the publication of international, interdisciplinary research and development in primary health care. It is essential reading for all involved in primary care: nurse practitioners, GPs and health service managers; professional and local groups in community health; researchers and academics; purchasers of primary health care services; allied health practitioners in secondary services and health-related consumer groups.
期刊最新文献
Development of Diet Score for Identifying the Relationship between Diet Patterns and Dietary Guidelines in Singapore Near-patient testing of blood cell counts using HemoScreen™ point of care instrument in a primary care setting COVID, the Emperor's New Clothes, and the Return of Tyranny Evans syndrome in an asymptomatic patient with COVID-19: Case report and review of the literature Ethical Issues in Family Violence Studies in Maternal and Child Health Settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1