瓜廖尔区达布拉区稻麦农户技术效率及顶楼排序技术评价

Rahul Kumar, A. Jaulkar, S. Srivastava, V. Singh
{"title":"瓜廖尔区达布拉区稻麦农户技术效率及顶楼排序技术评价","authors":"Rahul Kumar, A. Jaulkar, S. Srivastava, V. Singh","doi":"10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i330842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: An evaluation of technical efficiency and garret ranking technique of paddy and wheat farmers has been conducted. \nMethods: Multistage random sampling method was used to acquire sample farmer. A list of paddy and wheat growing farmers was prepared from Dabra block and twenty villages were selected randomly thereafter, a list of paddy and wheat farmers from each selected village was prepared then classified into five major categories on the basis of their land holding i.e. marginal(less than 1ha), small (1-2 ha), semi medium (2-4 ha), medium (4-10 ha), and large (greater than 10 ha). Then a sample of 30 farmers were selected in each category by simple random sampling technique under proportionate allocation from 20 villages treated as strata thus, 150 paddy and 150 wheat farmers were selected hence total sample size were 300. \nFinding: The likelihood test ratio (LR test) for the inefficiency term on paddy farms was observed at 32.91 which was significant and suggesting that the inefficiency component is present in the model. In the case of wheat farms, the likelihood test ratio (LR test) was noted 1.02 which was insignificant and suggesting that the inefficiency component is not present in the model. The highest technical efficiency (88%) was found on the paddy farms as comparison to wheat farms (72%).This implied that on an average 12 per cent and 28 per cent of the technical potential was not achieved by paddy and wheat growers respectively. \nNovelty: The studies establish that wheat farmers have more opportunity to amplify the yield by adopting modern crop management practices, training activities as compared to paddy farmers.","PeriodicalId":14335,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Evaluation of Technical Efficiency and Garret Ranking Technique of Paddy and Wheat Farmers in Dabra Block Gwalior District M.P.\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Kumar, A. Jaulkar, S. Srivastava, V. Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i330842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: An evaluation of technical efficiency and garret ranking technique of paddy and wheat farmers has been conducted. \\nMethods: Multistage random sampling method was used to acquire sample farmer. A list of paddy and wheat growing farmers was prepared from Dabra block and twenty villages were selected randomly thereafter, a list of paddy and wheat farmers from each selected village was prepared then classified into five major categories on the basis of their land holding i.e. marginal(less than 1ha), small (1-2 ha), semi medium (2-4 ha), medium (4-10 ha), and large (greater than 10 ha). Then a sample of 30 farmers were selected in each category by simple random sampling technique under proportionate allocation from 20 villages treated as strata thus, 150 paddy and 150 wheat farmers were selected hence total sample size were 300. \\nFinding: The likelihood test ratio (LR test) for the inefficiency term on paddy farms was observed at 32.91 which was significant and suggesting that the inefficiency component is present in the model. In the case of wheat farms, the likelihood test ratio (LR test) was noted 1.02 which was insignificant and suggesting that the inefficiency component is not present in the model. The highest technical efficiency (88%) was found on the paddy farms as comparison to wheat farms (72%).This implied that on an average 12 per cent and 28 per cent of the technical potential was not achieved by paddy and wheat growers respectively. \\nNovelty: The studies establish that wheat farmers have more opportunity to amplify the yield by adopting modern crop management practices, training activities as compared to paddy farmers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i330842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant & Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i330842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对稻麦种植户的技术效率和顶楼排序技术进行评价。方法:采用多阶段随机抽样法对样本农户进行抽样调查。在Dabra区编制稻麦种植户名单,随后随机抽取20个村,每个村编制稻麦种植户名单,并根据其土地持有情况将稻麦种植户分为边际(小于1公顷)、小(1-2公顷)、半中等(2-4公顷)、中等(4-10公顷)和大(大于10公顷)5大类。采用简单随机抽样的方法,按比例分配,从20个分层村中各抽取30户农户,其中水田农户150户,小麦农户150户,总样本量为300人。结果:水田无效率项的似然检验比(LR检验)为32.91,具有显著性,表明模型中存在无效率成分。在小麦农场的情况下,似然检验比(LR检验)为1.02,这是不显著的,表明模型中不存在低效率成分。与小麦农场(72%)相比,水田的技术效率最高(88%)。这意味着稻田和小麦种植者平均分别有12%和28%的技术潜力没有实现。新颖性:研究表明,与水田农民相比,小麦农民有更多的机会通过采用现代作物管理实践和培训活动来扩大产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Evaluation of Technical Efficiency and Garret Ranking Technique of Paddy and Wheat Farmers in Dabra Block Gwalior District M.P.
Objective: An evaluation of technical efficiency and garret ranking technique of paddy and wheat farmers has been conducted. Methods: Multistage random sampling method was used to acquire sample farmer. A list of paddy and wheat growing farmers was prepared from Dabra block and twenty villages were selected randomly thereafter, a list of paddy and wheat farmers from each selected village was prepared then classified into five major categories on the basis of their land holding i.e. marginal(less than 1ha), small (1-2 ha), semi medium (2-4 ha), medium (4-10 ha), and large (greater than 10 ha). Then a sample of 30 farmers were selected in each category by simple random sampling technique under proportionate allocation from 20 villages treated as strata thus, 150 paddy and 150 wheat farmers were selected hence total sample size were 300. Finding: The likelihood test ratio (LR test) for the inefficiency term on paddy farms was observed at 32.91 which was significant and suggesting that the inefficiency component is present in the model. In the case of wheat farms, the likelihood test ratio (LR test) was noted 1.02 which was insignificant and suggesting that the inefficiency component is not present in the model. The highest technical efficiency (88%) was found on the paddy farms as comparison to wheat farms (72%).This implied that on an average 12 per cent and 28 per cent of the technical potential was not achieved by paddy and wheat growers respectively. Novelty: The studies establish that wheat farmers have more opportunity to amplify the yield by adopting modern crop management practices, training activities as compared to paddy farmers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physicochemical Properties of Technosols in Dumpsites of Enugu Urban Southeastern, Nigeria Agronomic Yield Performance of Rape and Assessment of Discrimination of Soil Fertilizer Amendments on Genotypic Responses Technological Quality of Dual-purpose Wheat Stored Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek): Progress in Breeding and Future Challenges Isotherms of Adsorption of Heavy Metals in Soils and Sediments of the La Villa River Basin-Panamá
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1