{"title":"纪录片的模式。三种模型分析","authors":"Carlos Guillermo Lloga Sanz","doi":"10.7764/67.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work is a theoretical study that compares the modes of documentary representation provided by Bill Nichols, Michael Renov, and John Corner. Such paradigms correspond to the increase of documentary studies from the beginnings of nineties of 20th century. They have become prominent guides for the reinterpretation of aesthetics and history of documentary film. The critical revision proposed here includes the analysis of specific examples of Cuban documentary films produced by Cuban Institute of Art and Cinematic Industry (ICAIC) between 1959 and 1991. The three models followed identify different theoretical backgrounds over which project the image of documentary, for that reason, this study argues for the triangulation of the categories in the exam of significant volumes of documentaries.","PeriodicalId":43414,"journal":{"name":"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico","volume":"50 1","pages":"75-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Los modos del cine documental. Análisis de tres modelos\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Guillermo Lloga Sanz\",\"doi\":\"10.7764/67.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present work is a theoretical study that compares the modes of documentary representation provided by Bill Nichols, Michael Renov, and John Corner. Such paradigms correspond to the increase of documentary studies from the beginnings of nineties of 20th century. They have become prominent guides for the reinterpretation of aesthetics and history of documentary film. The critical revision proposed here includes the analysis of specific examples of Cuban documentary films produced by Cuban Institute of Art and Cinematic Industry (ICAIC) between 1959 and 1991. The three models followed identify different theoretical backgrounds over which project the image of documentary, for that reason, this study argues for the triangulation of the categories in the exam of significant volumes of documentaries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"75-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7764/67.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7764/67.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Los modos del cine documental. Análisis de tres modelos
The present work is a theoretical study that compares the modes of documentary representation provided by Bill Nichols, Michael Renov, and John Corner. Such paradigms correspond to the increase of documentary studies from the beginnings of nineties of 20th century. They have become prominent guides for the reinterpretation of aesthetics and history of documentary film. The critical revision proposed here includes the analysis of specific examples of Cuban documentary films produced by Cuban Institute of Art and Cinematic Industry (ICAIC) between 1959 and 1991. The three models followed identify different theoretical backgrounds over which project the image of documentary, for that reason, this study argues for the triangulation of the categories in the exam of significant volumes of documentaries.
期刊介绍：
The choice of the name of the journal represents a farewell from the identification of aesthetics with hermeneutics and speculative philosophy of art. It also shows our strong commitment to the irreducibility of aesthetics to a mere psychological fact. The subtitle of the journal “practices, languages and knowledge concerning aesthetics” indicates the present, fertile pluralism of aesthetics. This is a pluralism of views and methods, often connected with the different ways in which contemporary arts and aesthetic abilities present and structure themselves. Also, it is a pluralism of thoughts and formulas, which induces to relativize the western tradition within which the discipline of aesthetics was born. Finally, it is a pluralism of epistemic landscapes, which also trespasses into the sphere of sensibility and art. These various, epistemic landscapes have recently experienced a revolutionary enlargement through the rise of some new or radically renewed disciplines (from neurosciences to anthropology, from cognitive sciences to psychobiology). Indeed, we conceive Aisthesis as a public space where those different approaches and disciplines can interact.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
