强化采油气体流度曲线的实验评价

Ofasa Abunumah, Priscilla Ogunlude, E. Gobina
{"title":"强化采油气体流度曲线的实验评价","authors":"Ofasa Abunumah, Priscilla Ogunlude, E. Gobina","doi":"10.4236/ACES.2021.112010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The mobility profiles of gases used in enhanced oil \nrecovery (EOR) have been thoroughly investigated through the coupling \noperations of data mining of oilfield data and experimental data analyses. \nMobility as an EOR objective function has not been previously applied to \ncharacterize potential reservoirs for EOR selection and application, even \nthough it is a robust combinatorial function that benefits from two \npetrophysical variables, permeability and viscosity. The data mining approach \nidentified mobility as a reliable objective function for reservoir \ncharacterisation. The data distribution and clustering results indicate that Gas EOR reservoirs have \nrelatively higher mean mobility than Thermal, Microbial and Chemical EOR \nreservoirs. The experimental approach investigated EOR gases, CO2, \nCH4, N2, and Air. A modified Darcy Equation of State for \ngas flow through porous media was applied to evaluate which gas would \ncompetitively attain the oil displacement optimisation criterion for mobility \nratio, M ≤ 1. Coupling the data mining with the experimental data results \nreveals that gas reservoirs can be further categorized by mobility. CH4 (18.16 mD/cp) was observed to have the \nhighest mobility followed by Air (14.60 mD/cp), \nN2 (13.61 mD/cp), and CO2 (12.96 mD/cp). The gas mobility order \nsignificantly corresponds with the mobility distribution of reservoirs that \nimplemented gas EOR processes. It was concluded that CO2 offers \nrelatively lower mobility, therefore, it is the most competitive EOR gas to \napproach the mobility ratio criterion of unity or less.","PeriodicalId":7332,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science","volume":"37 1","pages":"154-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Evaluation of the Mobility Profile of Enhanced Oil Recovery Gases\",\"authors\":\"Ofasa Abunumah, Priscilla Ogunlude, E. Gobina\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ACES.2021.112010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The mobility profiles of gases used in enhanced oil \\nrecovery (EOR) have been thoroughly investigated through the coupling \\noperations of data mining of oilfield data and experimental data analyses. \\nMobility as an EOR objective function has not been previously applied to \\ncharacterize potential reservoirs for EOR selection and application, even \\nthough it is a robust combinatorial function that benefits from two \\npetrophysical variables, permeability and viscosity. The data mining approach \\nidentified mobility as a reliable objective function for reservoir \\ncharacterisation. The data distribution and clustering results indicate that Gas EOR reservoirs have \\nrelatively higher mean mobility than Thermal, Microbial and Chemical EOR \\nreservoirs. The experimental approach investigated EOR gases, CO2, \\nCH4, N2, and Air. A modified Darcy Equation of State for \\ngas flow through porous media was applied to evaluate which gas would \\ncompetitively attain the oil displacement optimisation criterion for mobility \\nratio, M ≤ 1. Coupling the data mining with the experimental data results \\nreveals that gas reservoirs can be further categorized by mobility. CH4 (18.16 mD/cp) was observed to have the \\nhighest mobility followed by Air (14.60 mD/cp), \\nN2 (13.61 mD/cp), and CO2 (12.96 mD/cp). The gas mobility order \\nsignificantly corresponds with the mobility distribution of reservoirs that \\nimplemented gas EOR processes. It was concluded that CO2 offers \\nrelatively lower mobility, therefore, it is the most competitive EOR gas to \\napproach the mobility ratio criterion of unity or less.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"154-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ACES.2021.112010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ACES.2021.112010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

通过对油田数据的数据挖掘和实验数据分析的耦合操作,对提高采收率(EOR)所用气体的运移曲线进行了深入的研究。尽管流动性是一个强大的组合函数,可以从渗透率和粘度这两个岩石物理变量中获益,但作为EOR目标函数,之前还没有应用于描述潜在储层的EOR选择和应用。数据挖掘方法将流动性确定为储层表征的可靠目标函数。数据分布和聚类结果表明,天然气提高采收率储层的平均流度高于热力、微生物和化学提高采收率储层。实验方法研究了EOR气体、CO2、CH4、N2和Air。采用修正的达西状态方程(Darcy State Equation of gas流过多孔介质)来评估哪些气体能够竞争达到流度比M≤1的驱油优化准则。将数据挖掘与实验数据结果相结合,可以进一步通过流动性对气藏进行分类。CH4 (18.16 mD/cp)的迁移率最高,其次是空气(14.60 mD/cp)、N2 (13.61 mD/cp)和CO2 (12.96 mD/cp)。气相运移顺序与实施了提高采收率的储层的运移分布有显著的对应关系。综上所示,CO2的流度相对较低,接近等于或小于等于流度比标准是最具竞争力的提高采收率气体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental Evaluation of the Mobility Profile of Enhanced Oil Recovery Gases
The mobility profiles of gases used in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) have been thoroughly investigated through the coupling operations of data mining of oilfield data and experimental data analyses. Mobility as an EOR objective function has not been previously applied to characterize potential reservoirs for EOR selection and application, even though it is a robust combinatorial function that benefits from two petrophysical variables, permeability and viscosity. The data mining approach identified mobility as a reliable objective function for reservoir characterisation. The data distribution and clustering results indicate that Gas EOR reservoirs have relatively higher mean mobility than Thermal, Microbial and Chemical EOR reservoirs. The experimental approach investigated EOR gases, CO2, CH4, N2, and Air. A modified Darcy Equation of State for gas flow through porous media was applied to evaluate which gas would competitively attain the oil displacement optimisation criterion for mobility ratio, M ≤ 1. Coupling the data mining with the experimental data results reveals that gas reservoirs can be further categorized by mobility. CH4 (18.16 mD/cp) was observed to have the highest mobility followed by Air (14.60 mD/cp), N2 (13.61 mD/cp), and CO2 (12.96 mD/cp). The gas mobility order significantly corresponds with the mobility distribution of reservoirs that implemented gas EOR processes. It was concluded that CO2 offers relatively lower mobility, therefore, it is the most competitive EOR gas to approach the mobility ratio criterion of unity or less.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Catalytic Evaluation of TiO<SUB>2</SUB>-supported Cu-Ag Bimetallic Clusters in the Oxidation of Thymol Blue Solutions Study of the Methanogenic Potential of the Organic Fraction of Household Waste and Similar with and Without Inoculum (Leachate): Case of the AKÉPÉ Technical Landfill Center (TOGO) Optimization of Biomethane Production from Chicken Droppings and Pig Manure Kinetics of Bioremediation of Oil Contaminated Water Dispersed by Environment-Friendly Bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and Fungi (Aspergillus niger) Production and Evaluation of the Nutritional and Functional Qualities of “Adakwa” Enriched with Waste Biomass of Traditional Brewer’s Spent Grain as a Functional Staple Food
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1