丙酸氟替卡松联合沙美特罗经DISKUS与单独丙酸氟替卡松长期治疗的安全性和有效性比较

E. Kerwin, C. Prazma, Laura B Sutton, D. Stempel
{"title":"丙酸氟替卡松联合沙美特罗经DISKUS与单独丙酸氟替卡松长期治疗的安全性和有效性比较","authors":"E. Kerwin, C. Prazma, Laura B Sutton, D. Stempel","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2010.544315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This 52 week study (ADA109057; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00452348) was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol 250/50 mcg via DISKUS (FSC) vs FP 250 mcg in subjects with persistent asthma symptomatic on FP 100 mcg. The objective was to demonstrate superiority in lung function (FEV1) of FSC 250/50 mcg vs FP 250 mcg. Secondary objectives included AM PEF, percentage of symptom-free days, and rate of asthma attacks. Three hundred and ten subjects received FSC 250/50 mcg and 318 subjects received FP 250 mcg, both administered twice daily following a 14–21 days of open-label FP 100 mcg. Treatment with FSC 250/50 mcg resulted in an improvement in lung function vs FP 250 mcg (p = 0.09). Additionally, treatment with FSC 250/50 mcg improved AM PEF and increased the percentage of symptom-free days. The asthma attack rate was similar between treatments, as was the safety profile. FSC 250/50 mcg demonstrated improvements in lung function and asthma control vs FP 250 mcg, although statistically significant differences were not consistent. The differences may be representative of this population with less severe disease at entry. In patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma FSC offers improved parameters of asthma control compared with ICS alone.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"55 1","pages":"14 - 21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol via DISKUS versus fluticasone propionate alone\",\"authors\":\"E. Kerwin, C. Prazma, Laura B Sutton, D. Stempel\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10601333.2010.544315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This 52 week study (ADA109057; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00452348) was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol 250/50 mcg via DISKUS (FSC) vs FP 250 mcg in subjects with persistent asthma symptomatic on FP 100 mcg. The objective was to demonstrate superiority in lung function (FEV1) of FSC 250/50 mcg vs FP 250 mcg. Secondary objectives included AM PEF, percentage of symptom-free days, and rate of asthma attacks. Three hundred and ten subjects received FSC 250/50 mcg and 318 subjects received FP 250 mcg, both administered twice daily following a 14–21 days of open-label FP 100 mcg. Treatment with FSC 250/50 mcg resulted in an improvement in lung function vs FP 250 mcg (p = 0.09). Additionally, treatment with FSC 250/50 mcg improved AM PEF and increased the percentage of symptom-free days. The asthma attack rate was similar between treatments, as was the safety profile. FSC 250/50 mcg demonstrated improvements in lung function and asthma control vs FP 250 mcg, although statistically significant differences were not consistent. The differences may be representative of this population with less severe disease at entry. In patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma FSC offers improved parameters of asthma control compared with ICS alone.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"14 - 21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2010.544315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2010.544315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

这项为期52周的研究(ADA109057;ClinicalTrials.gov试验号:NCT00452348)旨在通过DISKUS (FSC)评估丙酸氟替卡松(FP)/沙美特罗250/50 mcg与FP 250 mcg在服用FP 100 mcg的持续性哮喘症状患者中的安全性和有效性。目的是证明250/50 mcg FSC与250 mcg FP在肺功能(FEV1)方面的优势。次要目标包括AM PEF、无症状天数百分比和哮喘发作率。310名受试者接受FSC 250/50 mcg, 318名受试者接受FP 250 mcg,在14-21天的开放标签FP 100 mcg后,每天两次给药。与250 mcg的FSC相比,250 mcg的FSC治疗导致肺功能的改善(p = 0.09)。此外,用FSC 250/50 mcg治疗可改善AM PEF并增加无症状天数的百分比。两种治疗方法的哮喘发作率相似,安全性也相似。与250 mcg的FSC相比,250 mcg的FSC在肺功能和哮喘控制方面表现出改善,尽管统计学上的显著差异并不一致。这些差异可能代表了入境时疾病较轻的人群。在轻度至中度持续性哮喘患者中,与单独使用ICS相比,FSC提供了更好的哮喘控制参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol via DISKUS versus fluticasone propionate alone
This 52 week study (ADA109057; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00452348) was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol 250/50 mcg via DISKUS (FSC) vs FP 250 mcg in subjects with persistent asthma symptomatic on FP 100 mcg. The objective was to demonstrate superiority in lung function (FEV1) of FSC 250/50 mcg vs FP 250 mcg. Secondary objectives included AM PEF, percentage of symptom-free days, and rate of asthma attacks. Three hundred and ten subjects received FSC 250/50 mcg and 318 subjects received FP 250 mcg, both administered twice daily following a 14–21 days of open-label FP 100 mcg. Treatment with FSC 250/50 mcg resulted in an improvement in lung function vs FP 250 mcg (p = 0.09). Additionally, treatment with FSC 250/50 mcg improved AM PEF and increased the percentage of symptom-free days. The asthma attack rate was similar between treatments, as was the safety profile. FSC 250/50 mcg demonstrated improvements in lung function and asthma control vs FP 250 mcg, although statistically significant differences were not consistent. The differences may be representative of this population with less severe disease at entry. In patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma FSC offers improved parameters of asthma control compared with ICS alone.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changes to protocol in the regulation of adverse drug reactions – historical and current European view Policy and regulations in light of the human body as a ‘superorganism’ containing multiple, intertwined symbiotic relationships Community pharmacists’ knowledge and perceptions on risk management plans in the Southern Region of Portugal Increasing the odds of effective drug development: Elevating regulatory affairs professionals to strategic partners Current regulatory challenges and approaches in the registration of herbal drugs in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1