{"title":"新兴的企业可持续发展报告制度:工人代表的角色是什么?","authors":"S. Vitols","doi":"10.1177/10242589231175607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past few years a number of important initiatives have been launched to try to ensure that companies provide accurate information about their impacts on the environment and society. In 2022 the EU legislators approved the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which provides a legal basis mandating sustainability reporting by large EU companies.1 At the international level, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), a private initiative launched in 2021, has started work on voluntary reporting standards. And in the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has asked for input on corporate reporting requirements on environmental, social and governance issues. These initiatives are in response to the growing societal expectation that corporate reporting should go beyond financial issues. As the dimensions and consequences of climate change become clearer, pressure on corporations to disclose not only their impacts on the environment but also their plans for reducing their negative impacts is increasing. Furthermore, growing awareness of child and forced labour in supply chains and in-work poverty has increased expectations that companies should report on human rights and working conditions. Although all of these initiatives are aimed at reducing ‘greenwashing’ and satisfying stakeholders’ needs for credible information on companies’ impacts on people and planet, there are significant differences between them regarding the role of workers’ representatives.2 These initiatives highlight three fundamental questions that are currently being debated. First, for whom is sustainability reporting intended? Is it primarily for investors or for other ‘users’, including trade unions and NGOs? Second, which stakeholders should be involved in the development of rules for sustainability reporting: auditors, investors and companies, or a broader set of stakeholders? And third, which stakeholders should be involved in sustainability reporting at the company level? How these questions are answered will be crucial for defining workers’ representatives’ role in sustainability reporting and in the relevance of sustainability reports for workers. This report focuses on the two initiatives most relevant to EU companies: the mandatory system regulated by the CSRD, and the private initiative centred on the ISSB. It starts with the ISSB, which is intended primarily for investors and defines no explicit role for trade unions and works councils. It contrasts this with the CSRD, which includes the right for workers’ representatives to 1175607 TRS0010.1177/10242589231175607TransferVitols news2023","PeriodicalId":23253,"journal":{"name":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","volume":"42 1","pages":"261 - 265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The emerging corporate sustainability reporting system: what role for workers’ representatives?\",\"authors\":\"S. Vitols\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10242589231175607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the past few years a number of important initiatives have been launched to try to ensure that companies provide accurate information about their impacts on the environment and society. In 2022 the EU legislators approved the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which provides a legal basis mandating sustainability reporting by large EU companies.1 At the international level, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), a private initiative launched in 2021, has started work on voluntary reporting standards. And in the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has asked for input on corporate reporting requirements on environmental, social and governance issues. These initiatives are in response to the growing societal expectation that corporate reporting should go beyond financial issues. As the dimensions and consequences of climate change become clearer, pressure on corporations to disclose not only their impacts on the environment but also their plans for reducing their negative impacts is increasing. Furthermore, growing awareness of child and forced labour in supply chains and in-work poverty has increased expectations that companies should report on human rights and working conditions. Although all of these initiatives are aimed at reducing ‘greenwashing’ and satisfying stakeholders’ needs for credible information on companies’ impacts on people and planet, there are significant differences between them regarding the role of workers’ representatives.2 These initiatives highlight three fundamental questions that are currently being debated. First, for whom is sustainability reporting intended? Is it primarily for investors or for other ‘users’, including trade unions and NGOs? Second, which stakeholders should be involved in the development of rules for sustainability reporting: auditors, investors and companies, or a broader set of stakeholders? And third, which stakeholders should be involved in sustainability reporting at the company level? How these questions are answered will be crucial for defining workers’ representatives’ role in sustainability reporting and in the relevance of sustainability reports for workers. This report focuses on the two initiatives most relevant to EU companies: the mandatory system regulated by the CSRD, and the private initiative centred on the ISSB. It starts with the ISSB, which is intended primarily for investors and defines no explicit role for trade unions and works councils. It contrasts this with the CSRD, which includes the right for workers’ representatives to 1175607 TRS0010.1177/10242589231175607TransferVitols news2023\",\"PeriodicalId\":23253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"261 - 265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589231175607\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589231175607","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在过去的几年里,已经启动了一些重要的举措,以确保公司提供有关其对环境和社会影响的准确信息。2022年,欧盟立法者批准了《企业可持续发展报告指令》(CSRD),该指令为欧盟大型公司的可持续发展报告提供了法律依据在国际层面,国际可持续标准委员会(ISSB)是一个于2021年启动的私人倡议,已开始制定自愿报告标准。在美国,证券交易委员会(Securities And Exchange Commission,简称SEC)已就企业在环境、社会和治理问题上的报告要求征求意见。这些举措是为了回应越来越多的社会期望,即企业报告应超越财务问题。随着气候变化的规模和后果变得更加清晰,企业不仅要披露其对环境的影响,还要披露其减少负面影响的计划,这一压力正在增加。此外,越来越多的人意识到供应链中的童工和强迫劳动以及工作中的贫困问题,这提高了人们对企业应报告人权和工作条件的期望。尽管所有这些举措都旨在减少“漂绿”,并满足利益相关者对公司对人类和地球影响的可靠信息的需求,但在工人代表的角色方面,它们之间存在显著差异这些倡议突出了目前正在辩论的三个基本问题。首先,可持续发展报告是为谁准备的?它主要是针对投资者还是其他“用户”,包括工会和非政府组织?其次,哪些利益相关者应该参与可持续发展报告规则的制定:审计师、投资者和公司,还是更广泛的利益相关者?第三,哪些利益相关者应该参与公司层面的可持续发展报告?如何回答这些问题对于确定工人代表在可持续发展报告中的作用以及可持续发展报告对工人的相关性至关重要。本报告重点关注与欧盟公司最相关的两项举措:由CSRD监管的强制性体系,以及以ISSB为中心的私人举措。首先是ISSB,它主要针对投资者,没有明确规定工会和劳资委员会的作用。它与CSRD形成对比,CSRD包括工人代表的权利,以1175607 TRS0010.1177/10242589231175607TransferVitols news2023
The emerging corporate sustainability reporting system: what role for workers’ representatives?
In the past few years a number of important initiatives have been launched to try to ensure that companies provide accurate information about their impacts on the environment and society. In 2022 the EU legislators approved the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which provides a legal basis mandating sustainability reporting by large EU companies.1 At the international level, the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), a private initiative launched in 2021, has started work on voluntary reporting standards. And in the United States, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has asked for input on corporate reporting requirements on environmental, social and governance issues. These initiatives are in response to the growing societal expectation that corporate reporting should go beyond financial issues. As the dimensions and consequences of climate change become clearer, pressure on corporations to disclose not only their impacts on the environment but also their plans for reducing their negative impacts is increasing. Furthermore, growing awareness of child and forced labour in supply chains and in-work poverty has increased expectations that companies should report on human rights and working conditions. Although all of these initiatives are aimed at reducing ‘greenwashing’ and satisfying stakeholders’ needs for credible information on companies’ impacts on people and planet, there are significant differences between them regarding the role of workers’ representatives.2 These initiatives highlight three fundamental questions that are currently being debated. First, for whom is sustainability reporting intended? Is it primarily for investors or for other ‘users’, including trade unions and NGOs? Second, which stakeholders should be involved in the development of rules for sustainability reporting: auditors, investors and companies, or a broader set of stakeholders? And third, which stakeholders should be involved in sustainability reporting at the company level? How these questions are answered will be crucial for defining workers’ representatives’ role in sustainability reporting and in the relevance of sustainability reports for workers. This report focuses on the two initiatives most relevant to EU companies: the mandatory system regulated by the CSRD, and the private initiative centred on the ISSB. It starts with the ISSB, which is intended primarily for investors and defines no explicit role for trade unions and works councils. It contrasts this with the CSRD, which includes the right for workers’ representatives to 1175607 TRS0010.1177/10242589231175607TransferVitols news2023