酸碱材料中基于多元智能的学生科学素养和批判性思维评估工具的有效性

Muji Rahayu Wigati, Asmadi M. Noer, Lenny Anwar
{"title":"酸碱材料中基于多元智能的学生科学素养和批判性思维评估工具的有效性","authors":"Muji Rahayu Wigati, Asmadi M. Noer, Lenny Anwar","doi":"10.24114/jpkim.v15i2.43681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to create an assessment tool to evaluate students' scientific reading comprehension and critical thinking ability based on multiple intelligences on acid-base materials and to determine the validity of this study rating tool. The research methodology uses the Borg and Gal research and development model. This research phase continues into the development phase. The assessment instrument developed in this study consists of sixteen items of description test questions that refer to science literacy indicators consisting of four indicators are science as a body of knowledge; science as a way of investigation; science as a way of thinking; and the interaction of science, technology and society. Then the assessment instrument refers to critical thinking which consists of five indicators: providing a simple explanation, building basic skills, inference, providing further explanation, and developing strategies and tactics. This assessment instrument is based on multiple intelligences consisting of five types of intelligence: logical-mathematical, verbal-linguistic, visual-spatial, rhythmic-musical, and naturalistic. The validation of this assessment instrument is carried out by five validators. Validation by material experts is measured using the Guttman scale. Validity according to experts, namely aspects of material, language, and construction, obtained on average expert validation ranges from 90,33 – 94,7% and 16 questions are declared valid. Assessment instruments have been developed to be useful as a measure of a student's creative thinking ability.","PeriodicalId":17697,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of instruments for assessment of scientific literacy and critical thinking of students based on multiple intelligence in acid-base material\",\"authors\":\"Muji Rahayu Wigati, Asmadi M. Noer, Lenny Anwar\",\"doi\":\"10.24114/jpkim.v15i2.43681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to create an assessment tool to evaluate students' scientific reading comprehension and critical thinking ability based on multiple intelligences on acid-base materials and to determine the validity of this study rating tool. The research methodology uses the Borg and Gal research and development model. This research phase continues into the development phase. The assessment instrument developed in this study consists of sixteen items of description test questions that refer to science literacy indicators consisting of four indicators are science as a body of knowledge; science as a way of investigation; science as a way of thinking; and the interaction of science, technology and society. Then the assessment instrument refers to critical thinking which consists of five indicators: providing a simple explanation, building basic skills, inference, providing further explanation, and developing strategies and tactics. This assessment instrument is based on multiple intelligences consisting of five types of intelligence: logical-mathematical, verbal-linguistic, visual-spatial, rhythmic-musical, and naturalistic. The validation of this assessment instrument is carried out by five validators. Validation by material experts is measured using the Guttman scale. Validity according to experts, namely aspects of material, language, and construction, obtained on average expert validation ranges from 90,33 – 94,7% and 16 questions are declared valid. Assessment instruments have been developed to be useful as a measure of a student's creative thinking ability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v15i2.43681\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v15i2.43681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在创建一个基于多元智能的学生科学阅读理解能力和批判性思维能力的测评工具,并确定该测评工具的有效性。研究方法采用Borg和Gal的研发模式。这个研究阶段持续到开发阶段。本研究开发的评估工具由16个涉及科学素养指标的描述性试题组成,其中四个指标是科学作为知识体系;科学作为一种研究方式;科学是一种思维方式;以及科学、技术和社会的相互作用。然后评估工具是指批判性思维,它由五个指标组成:提供简单的解释,建立基本技能,推理,提供进一步的解释,制定战略和战术。该评估工具基于多元智能,包括五种类型的智能:逻辑-数学,语言-语言,视觉-空间,节奏-音乐和自然主义。本评估工具的验证由五名验证者进行。材料专家的验证使用Guttman量表进行测量。根据专家的效度,即材料、语言和结构方面,获得的平均专家效度范围为90,33 - 94,7%,16个问题被宣布有效。评估工具已经发展成为一种有用的衡量学生的创造性思维能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity of instruments for assessment of scientific literacy and critical thinking of students based on multiple intelligence in acid-base material
This research aims to create an assessment tool to evaluate students' scientific reading comprehension and critical thinking ability based on multiple intelligences on acid-base materials and to determine the validity of this study rating tool. The research methodology uses the Borg and Gal research and development model. This research phase continues into the development phase. The assessment instrument developed in this study consists of sixteen items of description test questions that refer to science literacy indicators consisting of four indicators are science as a body of knowledge; science as a way of investigation; science as a way of thinking; and the interaction of science, technology and society. Then the assessment instrument refers to critical thinking which consists of five indicators: providing a simple explanation, building basic skills, inference, providing further explanation, and developing strategies and tactics. This assessment instrument is based on multiple intelligences consisting of five types of intelligence: logical-mathematical, verbal-linguistic, visual-spatial, rhythmic-musical, and naturalistic. The validation of this assessment instrument is carried out by five validators. Validation by material experts is measured using the Guttman scale. Validity according to experts, namely aspects of material, language, and construction, obtained on average expert validation ranges from 90,33 – 94,7% and 16 questions are declared valid. Assessment instruments have been developed to be useful as a measure of a student's creative thinking ability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Formulation and antibacterial activity of frankincense sap extract deodorant spray (Styrax benzoin) Comparative assessment of human salivary α-amylase inhibitor from Indonesian herbs Self-efficacy assessment in chemistry learning: Development and validation using confirmatory factor analysis Preparing of chemical bonding learning media based android using smart apps creator program The evaluation of biochemistry practicum based on several parameters of laboratory services in chemistry department Universitas Negeri Surabaya during the even semester
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1