M. Ott, K. Berbalk, T. Plecko, E. Wieland, M. Shipkova
{"title":"使用Bruker Toxtyper™检测尿液中滥用药物:在常规临床实验室环境中的经验","authors":"M. Ott, K. Berbalk, T. Plecko, E. Wieland, M. Shipkova","doi":"10.1016/j.clinms.2017.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urine screening can be used to detect misuse of illicit drugs and validate opioid replacement therapy compliance. It is common that immunochemical assays are combined with GC-MS for these applications. Bruker has recently released an ion trap mass spectrometer, called Toxtyper™, with the potential to replace current screening algorithms to detect drug misuse.</p><p>Here, we compare our current strategy of urine screening for misuse of cannabis, amphetamines, cocaine, opiates, benzodiazepine, methadone, sufentanil, and pregabalin to the Toxtyper protocols provided by the manufacturer.</p><p>The analytical performance of the instrument was determined on a selected drug panel and with 188 urine samples being compared to establish concordance between our currently established approach and the Toxtyper.</p><p>The lower limits of detection and identification for acetylcodeine, amphetamine, benzoylecgonine, methadone, and nordiazepam were below the common cut-offs for immunological screening assays and comparable to GC-MS. Imprecision and accuracy, both within- and between-series, were consistently <25%. Toxtyper screening for pregabalin and sufentail was less sensitive than a targeted LC-MS/MS assay. Concordance met the predefined criterion of >90% for all drugs, except for pregabalin. Cannabis misuse could not be detected due to the limited sensitivity of the Toxtyper assay protocols used and the inherent imprecision of the assay.</p><p>Our study has revealed that a considerable portion of our current time-consuming protocol for screening drugs of abuse in urine, based on the combination of multiple analytical methods, could be consolidated by the Toxtyper for a majority of the most-relevant substances in our patient population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48565,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Mass Spectrometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clinms.2017.08.002","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of drugs of abuse in urine using the Bruker Toxtyper™: Experiences in a routine clinical laboratory setting\",\"authors\":\"M. Ott, K. Berbalk, T. Plecko, E. Wieland, M. Shipkova\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinms.2017.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Urine screening can be used to detect misuse of illicit drugs and validate opioid replacement therapy compliance. It is common that immunochemical assays are combined with GC-MS for these applications. Bruker has recently released an ion trap mass spectrometer, called Toxtyper™, with the potential to replace current screening algorithms to detect drug misuse.</p><p>Here, we compare our current strategy of urine screening for misuse of cannabis, amphetamines, cocaine, opiates, benzodiazepine, methadone, sufentanil, and pregabalin to the Toxtyper protocols provided by the manufacturer.</p><p>The analytical performance of the instrument was determined on a selected drug panel and with 188 urine samples being compared to establish concordance between our currently established approach and the Toxtyper.</p><p>The lower limits of detection and identification for acetylcodeine, amphetamine, benzoylecgonine, methadone, and nordiazepam were below the common cut-offs for immunological screening assays and comparable to GC-MS. Imprecision and accuracy, both within- and between-series, were consistently <25%. Toxtyper screening for pregabalin and sufentail was less sensitive than a targeted LC-MS/MS assay. Concordance met the predefined criterion of >90% for all drugs, except for pregabalin. Cannabis misuse could not be detected due to the limited sensitivity of the Toxtyper assay protocols used and the inherent imprecision of the assay.</p><p>Our study has revealed that a considerable portion of our current time-consuming protocol for screening drugs of abuse in urine, based on the combination of multiple analytical methods, could be consolidated by the Toxtyper for a majority of the most-relevant substances in our patient population.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Mass Spectrometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clinms.2017.08.002\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Mass Spectrometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2376999817300223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2376999817300223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Chemistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
Detection of drugs of abuse in urine using the Bruker Toxtyper™: Experiences in a routine clinical laboratory setting
Urine screening can be used to detect misuse of illicit drugs and validate opioid replacement therapy compliance. It is common that immunochemical assays are combined with GC-MS for these applications. Bruker has recently released an ion trap mass spectrometer, called Toxtyper™, with the potential to replace current screening algorithms to detect drug misuse.
Here, we compare our current strategy of urine screening for misuse of cannabis, amphetamines, cocaine, opiates, benzodiazepine, methadone, sufentanil, and pregabalin to the Toxtyper protocols provided by the manufacturer.
The analytical performance of the instrument was determined on a selected drug panel and with 188 urine samples being compared to establish concordance between our currently established approach and the Toxtyper.
The lower limits of detection and identification for acetylcodeine, amphetamine, benzoylecgonine, methadone, and nordiazepam were below the common cut-offs for immunological screening assays and comparable to GC-MS. Imprecision and accuracy, both within- and between-series, were consistently <25%. Toxtyper screening for pregabalin and sufentail was less sensitive than a targeted LC-MS/MS assay. Concordance met the predefined criterion of >90% for all drugs, except for pregabalin. Cannabis misuse could not be detected due to the limited sensitivity of the Toxtyper assay protocols used and the inherent imprecision of the assay.
Our study has revealed that a considerable portion of our current time-consuming protocol for screening drugs of abuse in urine, based on the combination of multiple analytical methods, could be consolidated by the Toxtyper for a majority of the most-relevant substances in our patient population.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Mass Spectrometry publishes peer-reviewed articles addressing the application of mass spectrometric technologies in Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Pathology with the focus on diagnostic applications. It is the first journal dedicated specifically to the application of mass spectrometry and related techniques in the context of diagnostic procedures in medicine. The journal has an interdisciplinary approach aiming to link clinical, biochemical and technological issues and results.