使用Bruker Toxtyper™检测尿液中滥用药物:在常规临床实验室环境中的经验

IF 2.1 Q4 Chemistry Clinical Mass Spectrometry Pub Date : 2017-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinms.2017.08.002
M. Ott, K. Berbalk, T. Plecko, E. Wieland, M. Shipkova
{"title":"使用Bruker Toxtyper™检测尿液中滥用药物:在常规临床实验室环境中的经验","authors":"M. Ott,&nbsp;K. Berbalk,&nbsp;T. Plecko,&nbsp;E. Wieland,&nbsp;M. Shipkova","doi":"10.1016/j.clinms.2017.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urine screening can be used to detect misuse of illicit drugs and validate opioid replacement therapy compliance. It is common that immunochemical assays are combined with GC-MS for these applications. Bruker has recently released an ion trap mass spectrometer, called Toxtyper™, with the potential to replace current screening algorithms to detect drug misuse.</p><p>Here, we compare our current strategy of urine screening for misuse of cannabis, amphetamines, cocaine, opiates, benzodiazepine, methadone, sufentanil, and pregabalin to the Toxtyper protocols provided by the manufacturer.</p><p>The analytical performance of the instrument was determined on a selected drug panel and with 188 urine samples being compared to establish concordance between our currently established approach and the Toxtyper.</p><p>The lower limits of detection and identification for acetylcodeine, amphetamine, benzoylecgonine, methadone, and nordiazepam were below the common cut-offs for immunological screening assays and comparable to GC-MS. Imprecision and accuracy, both within- and between-series, were consistently &lt;25%. Toxtyper screening for pregabalin and sufentail was less sensitive than a targeted LC-MS/MS assay. Concordance met the predefined criterion of &gt;90% for all drugs, except for pregabalin. Cannabis misuse could not be detected due to the limited sensitivity of the Toxtyper assay protocols used and the inherent imprecision of the assay.</p><p>Our study has revealed that a considerable portion of our current time-consuming protocol for screening drugs of abuse in urine, based on the combination of multiple analytical methods, could be consolidated by the Toxtyper for a majority of the most-relevant substances in our patient population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48565,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Mass Spectrometry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clinms.2017.08.002","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of drugs of abuse in urine using the Bruker Toxtyper™: Experiences in a routine clinical laboratory setting\",\"authors\":\"M. Ott,&nbsp;K. Berbalk,&nbsp;T. Plecko,&nbsp;E. Wieland,&nbsp;M. Shipkova\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinms.2017.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Urine screening can be used to detect misuse of illicit drugs and validate opioid replacement therapy compliance. It is common that immunochemical assays are combined with GC-MS for these applications. Bruker has recently released an ion trap mass spectrometer, called Toxtyper™, with the potential to replace current screening algorithms to detect drug misuse.</p><p>Here, we compare our current strategy of urine screening for misuse of cannabis, amphetamines, cocaine, opiates, benzodiazepine, methadone, sufentanil, and pregabalin to the Toxtyper protocols provided by the manufacturer.</p><p>The analytical performance of the instrument was determined on a selected drug panel and with 188 urine samples being compared to establish concordance between our currently established approach and the Toxtyper.</p><p>The lower limits of detection and identification for acetylcodeine, amphetamine, benzoylecgonine, methadone, and nordiazepam were below the common cut-offs for immunological screening assays and comparable to GC-MS. Imprecision and accuracy, both within- and between-series, were consistently &lt;25%. Toxtyper screening for pregabalin and sufentail was less sensitive than a targeted LC-MS/MS assay. Concordance met the predefined criterion of &gt;90% for all drugs, except for pregabalin. Cannabis misuse could not be detected due to the limited sensitivity of the Toxtyper assay protocols used and the inherent imprecision of the assay.</p><p>Our study has revealed that a considerable portion of our current time-consuming protocol for screening drugs of abuse in urine, based on the combination of multiple analytical methods, could be consolidated by the Toxtyper for a majority of the most-relevant substances in our patient population.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Mass Spectrometry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clinms.2017.08.002\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Mass Spectrometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2376999817300223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Chemistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2376999817300223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Chemistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

尿液筛查可用于检测滥用非法药物和验证阿片类药物替代治疗的依从性。在这些应用中,免疫化学分析与GC-MS相结合是很常见的。Bruker最近发布了一种名为Toxtyper™的离子阱质谱仪,它有可能取代目前检测药物滥用的筛选算法。在这里,我们比较了目前尿液筛查大麻、安非他明、可卡因、阿片类药物、苯二氮卓类药物、美沙酮、舒芬太尼和普瑞巴林滥用的策略与制造商提供的Toxtyper方案。仪器的分析性能是在选定的药物面板上确定的,并与188份尿液样本进行比较,以建立我们目前建立的方法与弓形虫之间的一致性。乙酰可待因、安非他明、苯甲酰ecgonine、美沙酮和去甲地西泮的检测和鉴定下限低于免疫筛选试验的常见截止值,与GC-MS相当。序列内和序列间的不精密度和准确度均为25%。普瑞巴林和苏福临弓形虫筛查的敏感性低于靶向LC-MS/MS检测。除普瑞巴林外,所有药物的一致性均达到90%的预定标准。由于所使用的弓形虫测定方案的灵敏度有限以及测定固有的不精确性,无法检测到大麻滥用。我们的研究表明,我们目前在尿液中筛选滥用药物的相当一部分耗时的方案,基于多种分析方法的组合,可以通过Toxtyper对我们患者群体中大多数最相关的物质进行巩固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Detection of drugs of abuse in urine using the Bruker Toxtyper™: Experiences in a routine clinical laboratory setting

Urine screening can be used to detect misuse of illicit drugs and validate opioid replacement therapy compliance. It is common that immunochemical assays are combined with GC-MS for these applications. Bruker has recently released an ion trap mass spectrometer, called Toxtyper™, with the potential to replace current screening algorithms to detect drug misuse.

Here, we compare our current strategy of urine screening for misuse of cannabis, amphetamines, cocaine, opiates, benzodiazepine, methadone, sufentanil, and pregabalin to the Toxtyper protocols provided by the manufacturer.

The analytical performance of the instrument was determined on a selected drug panel and with 188 urine samples being compared to establish concordance between our currently established approach and the Toxtyper.

The lower limits of detection and identification for acetylcodeine, amphetamine, benzoylecgonine, methadone, and nordiazepam were below the common cut-offs for immunological screening assays and comparable to GC-MS. Imprecision and accuracy, both within- and between-series, were consistently <25%. Toxtyper screening for pregabalin and sufentail was less sensitive than a targeted LC-MS/MS assay. Concordance met the predefined criterion of >90% for all drugs, except for pregabalin. Cannabis misuse could not be detected due to the limited sensitivity of the Toxtyper assay protocols used and the inherent imprecision of the assay.

Our study has revealed that a considerable portion of our current time-consuming protocol for screening drugs of abuse in urine, based on the combination of multiple analytical methods, could be consolidated by the Toxtyper for a majority of the most-relevant substances in our patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Mass Spectrometry
Clinical Mass Spectrometry Chemistry-Spectroscopy
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Mass Spectrometry publishes peer-reviewed articles addressing the application of mass spectrometric technologies in Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Pathology with the focus on diagnostic applications. It is the first journal dedicated specifically to the application of mass spectrometry and related techniques in the context of diagnostic procedures in medicine. The journal has an interdisciplinary approach aiming to link clinical, biochemical and technological issues and results.
期刊最新文献
Mass spectrometry in clinical glycomics: The path from biomarker identification to clinical implementation A proposal for score assignment to characterize biological processes from mass spectral analysis of serum Analysis of urinary VOCs using mass spectrometric methods to diagnose cancer: A review Analysis of 17 fentanyls in plasma and blood by UPLC-MS/MS with interpretation of findings in surgical and postmortem casework Collision energy-breakdown curves – An additional tool to characterize MS/MS methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1