安全资产与金融脆弱性:理论与证据

Toni Ahnert, M. Macchiavelli
{"title":"安全资产与金融脆弱性:理论与证据","authors":"Toni Ahnert, M. Macchiavelli","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3460800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How does the access to safe assets affect the fragility and lending behavior of financial intermediaries? We develop a global-game model of investor redemptions from money market funds that hold safe assets and fund risky corporate borrowers. Using the 2013 U.S. debt limit episode and the Federal Reserve's Overnight Reverse Repurchase (ONRRP) facility as our empirical laboratory, we provide evidence consistent with the model's implications. In particular, access to a safe asset---the ONRRP---attenuates investor redemption incentives and allows money market mutual funds to maintain their lending to corporate borrowers. Overall, our results suggest that the public provision of a safe asset reduces intermediary fragility and increases lending to the real economy.","PeriodicalId":10548,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Political Economy: Monetary Policy eJournal","volume":"176 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe Assets and Financial Fragility: Theory and Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Toni Ahnert, M. Macchiavelli\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3460800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"How does the access to safe assets affect the fragility and lending behavior of financial intermediaries? We develop a global-game model of investor redemptions from money market funds that hold safe assets and fund risky corporate borrowers. Using the 2013 U.S. debt limit episode and the Federal Reserve's Overnight Reverse Repurchase (ONRRP) facility as our empirical laboratory, we provide evidence consistent with the model's implications. In particular, access to a safe asset---the ONRRP---attenuates investor redemption incentives and allows money market mutual funds to maintain their lending to corporate borrowers. Overall, our results suggest that the public provision of a safe asset reduces intermediary fragility and increases lending to the real economy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10548,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Political Economy: Monetary Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"176 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Political Economy: Monetary Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3460800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Political Economy: Monetary Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3460800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

获得安全资产如何影响金融中介机构的脆弱性和贷款行为?我们开发了一个投资者从货币市场基金赎回的全球博弈模型,这些基金持有安全资产,并为高风险的公司借款人提供资金。利用2013年美国债务上限事件和美联储隔夜逆回购(ONRRP)工具作为我们的实证实验室,我们提供了与模型含义一致的证据。特别是,获得一种安全资产——ONRRP——降低了投资者的赎回动机,并允许货币市场共同基金继续向企业借款人放贷。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,公共提供安全资产降低了中介机构的脆弱性,并增加了对实体经济的贷款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safe Assets and Financial Fragility: Theory and Evidence
How does the access to safe assets affect the fragility and lending behavior of financial intermediaries? We develop a global-game model of investor redemptions from money market funds that hold safe assets and fund risky corporate borrowers. Using the 2013 U.S. debt limit episode and the Federal Reserve's Overnight Reverse Repurchase (ONRRP) facility as our empirical laboratory, we provide evidence consistent with the model's implications. In particular, access to a safe asset---the ONRRP---attenuates investor redemption incentives and allows money market mutual funds to maintain their lending to corporate borrowers. Overall, our results suggest that the public provision of a safe asset reduces intermediary fragility and increases lending to the real economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rebalancing the Euro Area: Is Wage Adjustment in Germany the Answer? Labour Markets and Inflation in the Wake of the Pandemic The Effects of U.S. Monetary Policy on International Mutual Fund Investment Safe Assets and Financial Fragility: Theory and Evidence Explorations in Economic History: A Test of Structural Break in the US Money Supply Data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1