{"title":"消除高校图书馆的赤字思维:理论、反思与行动","authors":"Amy Lewontin","doi":"10.1080/15228959.2022.2085424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors of this new and much-needed book, Dismantling Deficit Thinking in Academic Libraries , offer the reader an understanding of the concept, a plan of action for academic librarians, and many thoughtful ways to consider and reflect on ways to transform their teaching and run their libraries. The book is organized into four discrete chapters, with many sug-gested readings deftly woven into the essays. Particularly worth noting are the thoughtful reflections from librarians in the field after each chapter. The authors have reached out widely into the library field to explore many different points of view. These reflective pieces discuss educational challenges and practices of librarians in the classroom and educational spaces in general. They have been written by a broad mix of librarians, including Cynthia Mari Orozco, Librarian for Equitable Services at East Los Angeles College; Naomi Binnie, the Digital Education Librarian at the University of Michigan; and Yi Ding, Online Instructional Design Librarian at California State University at Northridge, among many others. The authors begin the first section with a brief introductory history of deficit thinking in educational practice, which many readers new to this subject will find illuminating. As the authors describe this slim book, it is meant to be between the practical and the theoretical. For a topic that may be new to many academic librarians, it offers a way to understand and navigate the principles behind “ anti-deficit thinking ” and how to dismantle it in an easily understandable style.","PeriodicalId":35381,"journal":{"name":"Public Services Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dismantling deficit thinking in academic libraries: theory, reflection, and action\",\"authors\":\"Amy Lewontin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15228959.2022.2085424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors of this new and much-needed book, Dismantling Deficit Thinking in Academic Libraries , offer the reader an understanding of the concept, a plan of action for academic librarians, and many thoughtful ways to consider and reflect on ways to transform their teaching and run their libraries. The book is organized into four discrete chapters, with many sug-gested readings deftly woven into the essays. Particularly worth noting are the thoughtful reflections from librarians in the field after each chapter. The authors have reached out widely into the library field to explore many different points of view. These reflective pieces discuss educational challenges and practices of librarians in the classroom and educational spaces in general. They have been written by a broad mix of librarians, including Cynthia Mari Orozco, Librarian for Equitable Services at East Los Angeles College; Naomi Binnie, the Digital Education Librarian at the University of Michigan; and Yi Ding, Online Instructional Design Librarian at California State University at Northridge, among many others. The authors begin the first section with a brief introductory history of deficit thinking in educational practice, which many readers new to this subject will find illuminating. As the authors describe this slim book, it is meant to be between the practical and the theoretical. For a topic that may be new to many academic librarians, it offers a way to understand and navigate the principles behind “ anti-deficit thinking ” and how to dismantle it in an easily understandable style.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Services Quarterly\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Services Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2022.2085424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2022.2085424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dismantling deficit thinking in academic libraries: theory, reflection, and action
The authors of this new and much-needed book, Dismantling Deficit Thinking in Academic Libraries , offer the reader an understanding of the concept, a plan of action for academic librarians, and many thoughtful ways to consider and reflect on ways to transform their teaching and run their libraries. The book is organized into four discrete chapters, with many sug-gested readings deftly woven into the essays. Particularly worth noting are the thoughtful reflections from librarians in the field after each chapter. The authors have reached out widely into the library field to explore many different points of view. These reflective pieces discuss educational challenges and practices of librarians in the classroom and educational spaces in general. They have been written by a broad mix of librarians, including Cynthia Mari Orozco, Librarian for Equitable Services at East Los Angeles College; Naomi Binnie, the Digital Education Librarian at the University of Michigan; and Yi Ding, Online Instructional Design Librarian at California State University at Northridge, among many others. The authors begin the first section with a brief introductory history of deficit thinking in educational practice, which many readers new to this subject will find illuminating. As the authors describe this slim book, it is meant to be between the practical and the theoretical. For a topic that may be new to many academic librarians, it offers a way to understand and navigate the principles behind “ anti-deficit thinking ” and how to dismantle it in an easily understandable style.
期刊介绍:
Public Services Quarterly covers a broad spectrum of public service issues in academic libraries, presenting practical strategies for implementing new initiatives and research-based insights into effective practices. The journal publishes research-based and theoretical articles as well as case studies that advance the understanding of public services, including reference and research assistance, information literacy instruction, access and delivery services, and other services to patrons. Articles may examine creative ways to use technology to assist students and faculty. Practice-based articles should be thoroughly grounded in the literature and should situate the work done in one library into the larger context of the situation.