十年来,从公民的角度重新思考地区

Q2 Social Sciences Regions and Cohesion Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.3167/reco.2020.100302
H. Koff, Carmen Maganda, P. Lombaerde, E. Kauffer, Julia Ros Cuellar
{"title":"十年来,从公民的角度重新思考地区","authors":"H. Koff, Carmen Maganda, P. Lombaerde, E. Kauffer, Julia Ros Cuellar","doi":"10.3167/reco.2020.100302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The year 2020 has been challenging due to the different overlapping crises related to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is difficult to celebrate amidst the awareness of the worst global suffering in generations. Nonetheless, we consider ourselves extremely fortunate to commemorate ten years of Regions & Cohesion. It is not lost on us that our commemoration occurs amidst the above-cited crises. The inaugural issue of Regions & Cohesion\n(2011) was entitled “Regiones, régions, regions, everywhere. . . . But what about the people?” It noted that regional integration had proliferated throughout the 1990s and early 2000s to the point that some scholarship was suggesting that regions could one day substitute nation-states as prominent actors in global affairs. The opening editorial of this issue noted that successful region-building, at the supranational, transnational, and sub-national level was measured in terms of economic prosperity and political stability. The inaugural issue questioned this approach by studying how well regions respond to the needs of citizens. It asked whether regions serve the needs of their people or whether people serve the needs of regional economies. The coronavirus-related crises have merely emphasized many of the shortcomings of regions and regionalisms that this journal has documented throughout its first decade of existence.","PeriodicalId":37930,"journal":{"name":"Regions and Cohesion","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten years of re-thinking regions from citizens’ perspectives\",\"authors\":\"H. Koff, Carmen Maganda, P. Lombaerde, E. Kauffer, Julia Ros Cuellar\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/reco.2020.100302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The year 2020 has been challenging due to the different overlapping crises related to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is difficult to celebrate amidst the awareness of the worst global suffering in generations. Nonetheless, we consider ourselves extremely fortunate to commemorate ten years of Regions & Cohesion. It is not lost on us that our commemoration occurs amidst the above-cited crises. The inaugural issue of Regions & Cohesion\\n(2011) was entitled “Regiones, régions, regions, everywhere. . . . But what about the people?” It noted that regional integration had proliferated throughout the 1990s and early 2000s to the point that some scholarship was suggesting that regions could one day substitute nation-states as prominent actors in global affairs. The opening editorial of this issue noted that successful region-building, at the supranational, transnational, and sub-national level was measured in terms of economic prosperity and political stability. The inaugural issue questioned this approach by studying how well regions respond to the needs of citizens. It asked whether regions serve the needs of their people or whether people serve the needs of regional economies. The coronavirus-related crises have merely emphasized many of the shortcomings of regions and regionalisms that this journal has documented throughout its first decade of existence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regions and Cohesion\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regions and Cohesion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/reco.2020.100302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regions and Cohesion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/reco.2020.100302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于与COVID-19大流行相关的各种重叠危机,2020年充满挑战。在意识到几代人以来最严重的全球苦难的情况下,很难庆祝。尽管如此,我们认为自己非常幸运能够纪念十年的区域和凝聚力。我们不会忘记,我们的纪念活动发生在上述危机之中。《区域与凝聚力》(2011年)的创刊号题为“区域,区域,区域,无处不在. . . .”但是人呢?”报告指出,区域一体化在整个20世纪90年代和21世纪初不断扩散,以至于一些学者认为,区域有朝一日可能取代民族国家,成为全球事务中的重要参与者。本期的开篇社论指出,在超国家、跨国和次国家层面上,成功的地区建设是以经济繁荣和政治稳定来衡量的。创刊号通过研究地区对公民需求的反应,对这种方法提出了质疑。它提出的问题是,区域是为其人民的需要服务,还是人民为区域经济的需要服务。与冠状病毒相关的危机只是强调了本刊在创刊的头十年中所记录的地区和地区主义的许多缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ten years of re-thinking regions from citizens’ perspectives
The year 2020 has been challenging due to the different overlapping crises related to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is difficult to celebrate amidst the awareness of the worst global suffering in generations. Nonetheless, we consider ourselves extremely fortunate to commemorate ten years of Regions & Cohesion. It is not lost on us that our commemoration occurs amidst the above-cited crises. The inaugural issue of Regions & Cohesion (2011) was entitled “Regiones, régions, regions, everywhere. . . . But what about the people?” It noted that regional integration had proliferated throughout the 1990s and early 2000s to the point that some scholarship was suggesting that regions could one day substitute nation-states as prominent actors in global affairs. The opening editorial of this issue noted that successful region-building, at the supranational, transnational, and sub-national level was measured in terms of economic prosperity and political stability. The inaugural issue questioned this approach by studying how well regions respond to the needs of citizens. It asked whether regions serve the needs of their people or whether people serve the needs of regional economies. The coronavirus-related crises have merely emphasized many of the shortcomings of regions and regionalisms that this journal has documented throughout its first decade of existence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Regions and Cohesion
Regions and Cohesion Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Regions & Cohesionis the journal of the Consortium for Comparative Research on Regional Integration and Social Cohesion (RISC), a cross-regional, interdisciplinary, and multilingual network of socially conscious and prestigious research institutes in Europe, North America, South America, Africa, and Asia. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles on the human and environmental impacts of regional integration processes. It disseminates conceptual and empirical research (articles) and normative analysis (Leadership Forum) of topics related to human and environmental security, social cohesion, and governance. The journal facilitates a cross-regional intellectual dialogue on timely political, social and environmental issues from a regional perspective and is especially committed to publishing scholarship from emerging/transition countries and developing states. Its multilingual (English, Spanish and French) and interdisciplinary character contribute to the journal’s originality in providing an inclusive forum for scholars and practitioners in different world regions to engage in important international discussions related to sustainable human development. This dialogue reflects RISC’s mission of connecting scholars and practitioners from different world regions who otherwise would not have the opportunity to interact.
期刊最新文献
La política climática mexicana en la cuenca del río Usumacinta (1992–2018) Policy innovation through local, sustainable development evaluation Non-democracy tolerance Análisis socioambiental de la Laguna de Tres Palos, México Water cooperation within West Africa's major transboundary river basins
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1