平价医疗法案前后诊断为黑色素瘤患者的保险趋势:一项国家数据库研究

V. Ramachandran
{"title":"平价医疗法案前后诊断为黑色素瘤患者的保险趋势:一项国家数据库研究","authors":"V. Ramachandran","doi":"10.46889/jdr.2023.4109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was intended, in part, to reduce the uninsured population. It underwent full implementation in 2014 with optional state Medicaid expansion and health insurance marketplaces. Prior to the ACA, studies show that insurance status affects cancer care, including prevention, diagnosis, stage at diagnosis, and management. ACA impact on malignant melanoma is unknown. In this study, the primary objective is to examine the impact of the ACA on insurance rates among patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma. Survival by insurance type was also assessed.\n\nMethods: A retrospective analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry was performed for malignant melanoma between 2007 (first year of insurance da-ta in SEER) and 2015. Standardized mean differences were used for 2007-2013 and 2014-2015 (after full ACA implementation) for the primary objective. Sub-analysis was performed for Med-icaid expansion and non-expansion states. The impact of insurance type (uninsured, Medicaid, non-Medicaid) on all-cause and cause-specific mortality was assessed via adjusted cox regression models.\n\nResults: Nationally, the ACA decreased percentage of uninsured patients (-1.12% to -2.26%, P<0.05) and increased percentage of Medicaid enrollees (+1.53% to +4.02%, P<.005) diagnosed with malignant melanoma. Expansion states showed decreased percentage of uninsured patients (-1.43% to -2.24%, P<0.05) and increased percentage of Medicaid enrollees (+1.66% to +4.84%, P<0.05). Non-expansion states showed no change in percentages of uninsured patients and Medicaid enrollees. All-cause and cause-specific mortality were decreased in uninsured and Medicaid patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma compared to non-Medicaid insured patients (reference group).\n\nDiscussion: The ACA decreased the rate of patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma with uninsured status, but this was only significant in Medicaid expansion states. Although diagnosis of melanoma is associated with High Socioeconomic Status (SES), Medicaid expansion seems to have increased access to dermatologic care. Increasing the number of states expanding Medicaid may be beneficial. However, Medicaid patient have worse all-cause and cause-specific mortality compared to non-Medicaid insured patients. Addressing these disparities through policy is important to ensure insurance coverage translates to better outcomes.","PeriodicalId":15448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical & experimental dermatology research","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insurance Trends in Patients Diagnosed with Melanoma Before and After the Affordable Care Act: A National Database Study\",\"authors\":\"V. Ramachandran\",\"doi\":\"10.46889/jdr.2023.4109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was intended, in part, to reduce the uninsured population. It underwent full implementation in 2014 with optional state Medicaid expansion and health insurance marketplaces. Prior to the ACA, studies show that insurance status affects cancer care, including prevention, diagnosis, stage at diagnosis, and management. ACA impact on malignant melanoma is unknown. In this study, the primary objective is to examine the impact of the ACA on insurance rates among patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma. Survival by insurance type was also assessed.\\n\\nMethods: A retrospective analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry was performed for malignant melanoma between 2007 (first year of insurance da-ta in SEER) and 2015. Standardized mean differences were used for 2007-2013 and 2014-2015 (after full ACA implementation) for the primary objective. Sub-analysis was performed for Med-icaid expansion and non-expansion states. The impact of insurance type (uninsured, Medicaid, non-Medicaid) on all-cause and cause-specific mortality was assessed via adjusted cox regression models.\\n\\nResults: Nationally, the ACA decreased percentage of uninsured patients (-1.12% to -2.26%, P<0.05) and increased percentage of Medicaid enrollees (+1.53% to +4.02%, P<.005) diagnosed with malignant melanoma. Expansion states showed decreased percentage of uninsured patients (-1.43% to -2.24%, P<0.05) and increased percentage of Medicaid enrollees (+1.66% to +4.84%, P<0.05). Non-expansion states showed no change in percentages of uninsured patients and Medicaid enrollees. All-cause and cause-specific mortality were decreased in uninsured and Medicaid patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma compared to non-Medicaid insured patients (reference group).\\n\\nDiscussion: The ACA decreased the rate of patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma with uninsured status, but this was only significant in Medicaid expansion states. Although diagnosis of melanoma is associated with High Socioeconomic Status (SES), Medicaid expansion seems to have increased access to dermatologic care. Increasing the number of states expanding Medicaid may be beneficial. However, Medicaid patient have worse all-cause and cause-specific mortality compared to non-Medicaid insured patients. Addressing these disparities through policy is important to ensure insurance coverage translates to better outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical & experimental dermatology research\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical & experimental dermatology research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46889/jdr.2023.4109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical & experimental dermatology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46889/jdr.2023.4109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:《平价医疗法案》(ACA)的部分目的是减少未参保人口。该法案于2014年全面实施,包括可选的州医疗补助扩张和健康保险市场。在ACA之前,研究表明保险状况影响癌症治疗,包括预防、诊断、诊断阶段和管理。ACA对恶性黑色素瘤的影响尚不清楚。在这项研究中,主要目的是检查ACA对恶性黑色素瘤患者的保险费率的影响。按保险类型评估生存率。方法:回顾性分析2007年(SEER保险数据的第一年)至2015年恶性黑色素瘤的监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)癌症登记处的数据。2007-2013年和2014-2015年(ACA全面实施后)使用标准化平均差异作为主要目标。对医疗补助扩展和非扩展状态进行亚分析。保险类型(未投保、医疗补助、非医疗补助)对全因死亡率和原因特异性死亡率的影响通过调整后的cox回归模型进行评估。结果:在全国范围内,ACA降低了未参保患者的百分比(-1.12%至-2.26%,P<0.05),增加了医疗补助计划参保者的百分比(+1.53%至+4.02%,P< 0.005)。扩展州未参保患者比例下降(-1.43%至-2.24%,P<0.05),医疗补助参保比例上升(+1.66%至+4.84%,P<0.05)。未扩大的州未参保患者和医疗补助计划参保者的百分比没有变化。诊断为恶性黑色素瘤的无医疗保险和有医疗补助的患者的全因死亡率和特定原因死亡率比没有医疗补助的患者(参照组)降低。讨论:ACA降低了未参保的恶性黑色素瘤患者的比例,但这只在医疗补助扩大的州有显著意义。虽然黑色素瘤的诊断与高社会经济地位(SES)有关,但医疗补助计划的扩大似乎增加了获得皮肤科护理的机会。增加扩大医疗补助计划的州的数量可能是有益的。然而,与没有医疗补助的患者相比,医疗补助患者的全因死亡率和特定原因死亡率更低。通过政策解决这些差异对于确保保险覆盖转化为更好的结果非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insurance Trends in Patients Diagnosed with Melanoma Before and After the Affordable Care Act: A National Database Study
Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was intended, in part, to reduce the uninsured population. It underwent full implementation in 2014 with optional state Medicaid expansion and health insurance marketplaces. Prior to the ACA, studies show that insurance status affects cancer care, including prevention, diagnosis, stage at diagnosis, and management. ACA impact on malignant melanoma is unknown. In this study, the primary objective is to examine the impact of the ACA on insurance rates among patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma. Survival by insurance type was also assessed. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry was performed for malignant melanoma between 2007 (first year of insurance da-ta in SEER) and 2015. Standardized mean differences were used for 2007-2013 and 2014-2015 (after full ACA implementation) for the primary objective. Sub-analysis was performed for Med-icaid expansion and non-expansion states. The impact of insurance type (uninsured, Medicaid, non-Medicaid) on all-cause and cause-specific mortality was assessed via adjusted cox regression models. Results: Nationally, the ACA decreased percentage of uninsured patients (-1.12% to -2.26%, P<0.05) and increased percentage of Medicaid enrollees (+1.53% to +4.02%, P<.005) diagnosed with malignant melanoma. Expansion states showed decreased percentage of uninsured patients (-1.43% to -2.24%, P<0.05) and increased percentage of Medicaid enrollees (+1.66% to +4.84%, P<0.05). Non-expansion states showed no change in percentages of uninsured patients and Medicaid enrollees. All-cause and cause-specific mortality were decreased in uninsured and Medicaid patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma compared to non-Medicaid insured patients (reference group). Discussion: The ACA decreased the rate of patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma with uninsured status, but this was only significant in Medicaid expansion states. Although diagnosis of melanoma is associated with High Socioeconomic Status (SES), Medicaid expansion seems to have increased access to dermatologic care. Increasing the number of states expanding Medicaid may be beneficial. However, Medicaid patient have worse all-cause and cause-specific mortality compared to non-Medicaid insured patients. Addressing these disparities through policy is important to ensure insurance coverage translates to better outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Observed Causal Relationship Between Eczema and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Transient Eosinophilic Nodulomatosis: A Report of Two Cases ORF Nodule Complicated by Erythema Multiforme: About 2 Cases Erythema Nodosum Leprosum and Thalidomide: How Effective? Autoimmune Diseases a Late Complication of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1