克里斯托夫·门克的力量和讽刺

IF 0.3 0 PHILOSOPHY Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico Pub Date : 2016-12-14 DOI:10.4067/S0718-71812016000200002

Horacio Tarragona, Naím Garnica

{"title":"克里斯托夫·门克的力量和讽刺","authors":"Horacio Tarragona, Naím Garnica","doi":"10.4067/S0718-71812016000200002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Christoph Menke sostiene que el sujeto estetico no tiene lugar en la tradicion del sujeto hegeliano-heideggeriano. El autor piensa que la subjetividad estetica no puede articularse, sin mas, con una metafisica del sujeto. El escrito reconstruye tales planteos para pensar mas alla del sujeto absoluto recurriendo a dos estrategias: retornar a los conceptos de fuerza de Baumgarten e ironia de Schlegel. Recuperar esas propuestas abre otro modo de comprender la modernidad y la subjetividad.","PeriodicalId":43414,"journal":{"name":"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico","volume":"25 1","pages":"31-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuerza e ironía en Christoph Menke\",\"authors\":\"Horacio Tarragona, Naím Garnica\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/S0718-71812016000200002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Christoph Menke sostiene que el sujeto estetico no tiene lugar en la tradicion del sujeto hegeliano-heideggeriano. El autor piensa que la subjetividad estetica no puede articularse, sin mas, con una metafisica del sujeto. El escrito reconstruye tales planteos para pensar mas alla del sujeto absoluto recurriendo a dos estrategias: retornar a los conceptos de fuerza de Baumgarten e ironia de Schlegel. Recuperar esas propuestas abre otro modo de comprender la modernidad y la subjetividad.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"31-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-71812016000200002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-71812016000200002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

克里斯托夫·门克认为，审美主体在黑格尔-海德格尔的主体传统中没有地位。作者认为，审美主体性不能简单地用主体的形而上学来表达。在这篇文章中，我们提出了一种超越绝对主体的思考方法:回归鲍姆加顿的力量概念和施莱格尔的反讽概念。这些建议的恢复开启了理解现代性和主体性的另一种方式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Fuerza e ironía en Christoph Menke

Christoph Menke sostiene que el sujeto estetico no tiene lugar en la tradicion del sujeto hegeliano-heideggeriano. El autor piensa que la subjetividad estetica no puede articularse, sin mas, con una metafisica del sujeto. El escrito reconstruye tales planteos para pensar mas alla del sujeto absoluto recurriendo a dos estrategias: retornar a los conceptos de fuerza de Baumgarten e ironia de Schlegel. Recuperar esas propuestas abre otro modo de comprender la modernidad y la subjetividad.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Aisthesis-Pratiche Linguaggi e Saperi dell Estetico PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

40 weeks

期刊介绍： The choice of the name of the journal represents a farewell from the identification of aesthetics with hermeneutics and speculative philosophy of art. It also shows our strong commitment to the irreducibility of aesthetics to a mere psychological fact. The subtitle of the journal “practices, languages and knowledge concerning aesthetics” indicates the present, fertile pluralism of aesthetics. This is a pluralism of views and methods, often connected with the different ways in which contemporary arts and aesthetic abilities present and structure themselves. Also, it is a pluralism of thoughts and formulas, which induces to relativize the western tradition within which the discipline of aesthetics was born. Finally, it is a pluralism of epistemic landscapes, which also trespasses into the sphere of sensibility and art. These various, epistemic landscapes have recently experienced a revolutionary enlargement through the rise of some new or radically renewed disciplines (from neurosciences to anthropology, from cognitive sciences to psychobiology). Indeed, we conceive Aisthesis as a public space where those different approaches and disciplines can interact.